Kaylynn
#1,570 for girls in 2025, 134 births · Last seen for boys in 2005 at #11,472
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2009 · 590 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 12,252since 1947
Kaylynn over time
Rank among girls' names. Kaylynn has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,570 | 134 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,529 | 140 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,348 | 167 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,378 | 167 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,337 | 166 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,118 | 216 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,036 | 247 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,026 | 252 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,009 | 257 | — | |
| 2016 | #894 | 313 | — | |
| 2015 | #740 | 380 | — | |
| 2014 | #640 | 447 | — | |
| 2013 | #600 | 470 | — | |
| 2012 | #621 | 459 | — | |
| 2011 | #581 | 496 | — | |
| 2010 | #570 | 512 | — | |
| 2009 | #512 | 590 | — | |
| 2008 | #528 | 580 | — | |
| 2007 | #599 | 502 | — | |
| 2006 | #624 | 464 | — | |
| 2005 | #677 | 411 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #656 | 418 | — | |
| 2003 | #732 | 349 | — | |
| 2002 | #780 | 301 | — | |
| 2001 | #750 | 319 | — | |
| 2000 | #749 | 307 | — | |
| 1999 | #770 | 288 | — | |
| 1998 | #765 | 281 | — | |
| 1997 | #737 | 289 | — | |
| 1996 | #807 | 254 | — | |
| 1995 | #800 | 248 | — | |
| 1994 | #866 | 226 | — | |
| 1993 | #844 | 232 | — | |
| 1992 | #941 | 206 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,024 | 180 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,347 | 118 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,220 | 132 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,300 | 111 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,591 | 78 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,148 | 49 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,657 | 36 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,329 | 25 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,516 | 36 | — | |
| 1982 | #3,898 | 20 | — | |
| 1981 | #4,005 | 19 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,853 | 20 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,777 | 20 | — | |
| 1978 | #5,563 | 11 | — | |
| 1977 | #4,069 | 17 | — | |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | — | |
| 1975 | #3,950 | 16 | — | |
| 1974 | #4,459 | 13 | — | |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,793 | 11 | — | |
| 1971 | #4,534 | 12 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,030 | 22 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,418 | 11 | — | |
| 1968 | #3,789 | 13 | — | |
| 1967 | #4,300 | 10 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,752 | 20 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,264 | 15 | — | |
| 1964 | #3,000 | 18 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,635 | 13 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,011 | 11 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,318 | 15 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,357 | 14 | — | |
| 1959 | #3,254 | 14 | — | |
| 1958 | #4,193 | 9 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | — | |
| 1956 | #5,325 | 6 | — | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | #5,040 | 6 | — | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | — | |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | — | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kaylynn! It came in at #4,007, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1948–1952, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Kaylynn is popular in 2007
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Iowa#182 · 1 in 733
- Kentucky#245 · 1 in 1,078
- Indiana#301 · 1 in 1,381
- Missouri#334 · 1 in 1,560
- New Mexico#341 · 1 in 1,217
Best ever in a state: #101 in Wyoming, 2004.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #182 | 19 | 1 in 733 |
| Kentucky | #245 | 19 | 1 in 1,078 |
| Indiana | #301 | 24 | 1 in 1,381 |
| Missouri | #334 | 19 | 1 in 1,560 |
| New Mexico | #341 | 7 | 1 in 1,217 |
| Oklahoma | #354 | 12 | 1 in 1,484 |
| Nebraska | #411 | 5 | 1 in 1,674 |
| Michigan | #418 | 21 | 1 in 2,177 |
| Louisiana | #436 | 11 | 1 in 1,925 |
| Arkansas | #471 | 6 | 1 in 2,082 |
| Ohio | #471 | 23 | 1 in 2,494 |
| Oregon | #471 | 8 | 1 in 2,096 |
| Colorado | #492 | 11 | 1 in 2,260 |
| Washington | #514 | 13 | 1 in 2,407 |
| Alabama | #517 | 9 | 1 in 2,371 |
| Pennsylvania | #517 | 19 | 1 in 2,954 |
| North Carolina | #527 | 18 | 1 in 2,673 |
| Tennessee | #530 | 12 | 1 in 2,712 |
| Utah | #581 | 7 | 1 in 2,802 |
| Mississippi | #594 | 5 | 1 in 2,549 |
| South Carolina | #597 | 7 | 1 in 2,707 |
| Arizona | #601 | 13 | 1 in 2,920 |
| Georgia | #602 | 18 | 1 in 3,012 |
| Florida | #622 | 25 | 1 in 3,571 |
| Wisconsin | #627 | 7 | 1 in 3,643 |
| Illinois | #635 | 19 | 1 in 3,565 |
| Texas | #635 | 48 | 1 in 3,524 |
| Virginia | #906 | 7 | 1 in 5,496 |
| New York | #960 | 16 | 1 in 6,109 |
| California | #1,023 | 34 | 1 in 6,948 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kaylynn
- 41 spots since 2024 (#1,529 → #1,570)
- 452 spots since 2020 (#1,118 → #1,570)
- 830 spots since 2015 (#740 → #1,570)
- Biggest jump: 97 spots in 1993 (#941 → #844)
- Biggest drop: 154 spots in 2016 (#740 → #894)
- Debuted 1947
- Peaked 2009 at #512 (590 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 25 yrs · run 1992–2016
- Highest: 1 in 3,114 girls born in 2009 were named Kaylynn (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 11,995 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 34.6% of all girls named Kaylynn (4,241) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 13 | #4,007 (1947) | #4,625 |
| 1950s | 43 | #3,254 (1959) | #4,470 |
| 1960s | 140 | #2,752 (1966) | #3,584 |
| 1970s | 144 | #3,030 (1970) | #4,426 |
| 1980s | 526 | #1,220 (1989) | #2,652 |
| 1990s | 2,322 | #737 (1997) | #890 |
| 2000s | 4,241 | #512 (2009) | #661 |
| 2010s | 3,833 | #570 (2010) | #772 |
| 2020s | 990 | #1,118 (2020) | #1,380 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kaylynn in 2007
Top girls' names in 2007
More about 2007
girls
1,922,617 girls got a published name in 2007; 1 in 3,830 of them was named Kaylynn, which outranked 97.1% of the 20,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.