Kayton
- Last seen for girls in 2021 at #15,251
- #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
- Given to boys 51.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2016 · 13 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 180since 1999
Kayton over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #9,714 | 7 | |
| 2024 | — | #9,894 | 7 | |
| 2023 | — | #9,763 | 7 | |
| 2022 | — | #9,823 | 7 | |
| 2021 | #15,251 | 5 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2020 | — | #8,067 | 9 | |
| 2019 | — | #7,173 | 11 | |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | #7,136 | 11 |
| 2017 | #11,615 | 8 | #7,095 | 11 |
| 2016 | — | #6,349 | 13 | |
| 2015 | #13,006 | 7 | #8,744 | 8 |
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 | #7,562 | 10 |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | #8,118 | 9 |
| 2012 | #9,109 | 12 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | #8,079 | 9 |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | #7,591 | 10 |
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #8,965 | 13 | #8,324 | 9 |
| 2007 | #11,630 | 9 | #9,788 | 7 |
| 2006 | #11,417 | 9 | — | |
| 2005 | #10,128 | 10 | — | |
| 2004 | #8,259 | 13 | — | |
| 2003 | #7,998 | 13 | #10,894 | 5 |
| 2002 | #8,837 | 11 | #9,392 | 6 |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 | — | |
| 2000 | #10,745 | 8 | — | |
| 1999 | — | #8,704 | 6 | |
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | — | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1999
The first year at least five boys were named Kayton! It came in at #8,704, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2000–2001, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Kayton is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Kayton in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Kayton
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 180 spots since 2024 (#9,894 → #9,714)
- 1,647 spots since 2020 (#8,067 → #9,714)
- 970 spots since 2015 (#8,744 → #9,714)
Rise & fade · boys
17 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1999
- Peaked 2016 at #6,349 (13 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 145,980
- Highest: 1 in 145,980 boys born in 2016 were named Kayton (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 244,011 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 54.4% of all boys named Kayton (98) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2013
- Mostly girls until 2012, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6 | #8,704 (1999) | #8,704 |
| 2000s | 32 | #8,324 (2008) | #10,178 |
| 2010s | 98 | #6,349 (2016) | #7,862 |
| 2020s | 44 | #8,067 (2020) | #9,496 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Kayton ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: