Keagan
- #4,661 for girls in 2025, 29 births
- #1,609 for boys in 2025, 105 births
- Given to boys 83.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2008 · 564 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 8,784since 1977
Keagan over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,661 | 29 | #1,609 | 105 |
| 2024 | #4,039 | 36 | #1,620 | 105 |
| 2023 | #4,655 | 29 | #1,650 | 104 |
| 2022 | #4,793 | 28 | #1,425 | 128 |
| 2021 | #3,678 | 41 | #1,469 | 122 |
| 2020 | #3,841 | 37 | #1,149 | 169 |
| 2019 | #2,891 | 57 | #1,107 | 178 |
| 2018 | #3,201 | 50 | #918 | 234 |
| 2017 | #3,552 | 43 | #870 | 250 |
| 2016 | #2,902 | 58 | #869 | 258 |
| 2015 | #2,555 | 70 | #790 | 294 |
| 2014 | #2,469 | 73 | #741 | 321 |
| 2013 | #2,305 | 80 | #698 | 342 |
| 2012 | #2,426 | 76 | #585 | 437 |
| 2011 | #2,555 | 70 | #568 | 440 |
| 2010 | #2,274 | 84 | #526 | 492 |
| 2009 | #2,102 | 96 | #514 | 522 |
| 2008 | #2,137 | 94 | #489 | 564 |
| 2007 | #1,971 | 104 | #524 | 493 |
| 2006 | #2,978 | 57 | #620 | 383 |
| 2005 | #3,257 | 47 | #658 | 327 |
| 2004 | #3,224 | 47 | #693 | 286 |
| 2003 | #3,655 | 38 | #634 | 323 |
| 2002 | #3,103 | 46 | #724 | 245 |
| 2001 | #2,881 | 50 | #701 | 255 |
| 2000 | #2,593 | 57 | #729 | 235 |
| 1999 | #3,245 | 39 | #819 | 186 |
| 1998 | #4,492 | 24 | #950 | 147 |
| 1997 | #4,819 | 21 | #1,027 | 124 |
| 1996 | #3,361 | 34 | #990 | 126 |
| 1995 | #5,019 | 19 | #1,126 | 103 |
| 1994 | #5,016 | 19 | #1,244 | 87 |
| 1993 | #5,206 | 18 | #1,340 | 72 |
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 | #1,294 | 76 |
| 1991 | #6,976 | 12 | #1,632 | 51 |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | #1,840 | 42 |
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | #1,953 | 37 |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 | #2,305 | 26 |
| 1987 | #7,353 | 9 | #3,339 | 14 |
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 | #3,131 | 15 |
| 1985 | — | #3,599 | 12 | |
| 1984 | #8,153 | 7 | #4,552 | 8 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #4,907 | 7 |
| 1982 | #6,888 | 9 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | — | #4,153 | 9 | |
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | #4,134 | 9 |
| 1979 | — | #4,068 | 9 | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | #4,582 | 7 | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1977
The first year at least five boys were named Keagan! It came in at #4,582, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1978, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Keagan is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Wisconsin#785 · 1 in 4,686
- North Carolina#936 · 1 in 6,434
- Virginia#1,089 · 1 in 7,451
- Georgia#1,096 · 1 in 7,174
- Texas#1,555 · 1 in 15,914
Best ever in a state: #130 in Vermont, 2007.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin | #785 | 5 | 1 in 4,686 |
| North Carolina | #936 | 8 | 1 in 6,434 |
| Virginia | #1,089 | 5 | 1 in 7,451 |
| Georgia | #1,096 | 7 | 1 in 7,174 |
| Texas | #1,555 | 11 | 1 in 15,914 |
| California | #2,203 | 6 | 1 in 29,246 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Keagan
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 11 spots since 2024 (#1,620 → #1,609)
- 460 spots since 2020 (#1,149 → #1,609)
- Biggest jump: 136 spots in 1996
- Biggest drop: 189 spots in 2019
Rise & fade · boys
31 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1977
- Peaked 2008 at #489 (564 births)
- Births halved by 2016, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 22 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 22 yrs · run 1998–2018
Share of babies · boys
1 in 3,617
- Highest: 1 in 3,617 boys born in 2008 were named Keagan (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 16,267 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 41.4% of all boys named Keagan (3,633) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1983
- Mostly girls until 1982, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 16 | #4,068 (1979) | #4,325 |
| 1980s | 142 | #1,953 (1989) | #3,846 |
| 1990s | 1,014 | #819 (1999) | #1,226 |
| 2000s | 3,633 | #489 (2008) | #629 |
| 2010s | 3,246 | #526 (2010) | #767 |
| 2020s | 733 | #1,149 (2020) | #1,487 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Keagan ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: