Keely
- #2,719 for girls in 2025, 63 births
- Last seen for boys in 2006 at #12,055
- Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1997 · 555 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 12,698since 1957
Keely over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Keely has never cracked the top 400 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,719 | 63 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,053 | 94 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,646 | 66 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,174 | 87 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,440 | 73 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,549 | 67 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,891 | 57 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,190 | 85 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,283 | 81 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,221 | 86 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,996 | 99 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,634 | 131 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,487 | 149 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,364 | 171 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,280 | 185 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,143 | 214 | — | |
| 2009 | #936 | 286 | — | |
| 2008 | #842 | 335 | — | |
| 2007 | #730 | 399 | — | |
| 2006 | #698 | 407 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #812 | 318 | — | |
| 2004 | #771 | 335 | — | |
| 2003 | #709 | 368 | — | |
| 2002 | #640 | 397 | — | |
| 2001 | #632 | 398 | #10,556 | 5 |
| 2000 | #610 | 416 | — | |
| 1999 | #622 | 382 | — | |
| 1998 | #537 | 466 | — | |
| 1997 | #455 | 555 | — | |
| 1996 | #518 | 454 | #7,971 | 6 |
| 1995 | #919 | 205 | — | |
| 1994 | #863 | 227 | — | |
| 1993 | #826 | 239 | — | |
| 1992 | #734 | 288 | — | |
| 1991 | #789 | 259 | — | |
| 1990 | #766 | 267 | — | |
| 1989 | #874 | 211 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,025 | 158 | #7,270 | 5 |
| 1987 | #1,016 | 152 | — | |
| 1986 | #909 | 177 | — | |
| 1985 | #886 | 180 | — | |
| 1984 | #792 | 202 | — | |
| 1983 | #942 | 157 | — | |
| 1982 | #850 | 183 | — | |
| 1981 | #948 | 155 | — | |
| 1980 | #948 | 158 | — | |
| 1979 | #885 | 171 | — | |
| 1978 | #822 | 182 | — | |
| 1977 | #992 | 137 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,036 | 119 | — | |
| 1975 | #923 | 140 | — | |
| 1974 | #935 | 133 | — | |
| 1973 | #963 | 123 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,116 | 99 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,253 | 88 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,074 | 113 | — | |
| 1969 | #965 | 123 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,244 | 77 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,506 | 55 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,766 | 41 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,801 | 40 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,518 | 56 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,280 | 74 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,332 | 69 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,176 | 88 | — | |
| 1960 | #987 | 118 | — | |
| 1959 | #965 | 119 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,157 | 84 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 | — | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1957
The first year at least five girls were named Keely! It came in at #4,918, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1957, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Keely is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #2,921 | 6 | 1 in 26,757 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Keely
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 170 spots since 2020 (#2,549 → #2,719)
- Biggest jump: 401 spots in 1996
- Biggest drop: 207 spots in 2010
Rise & fade · girls
40 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1957
- Peaked 1997 at #455 (555 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 13 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 37 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 37 yrs · run 1989–2009
Share of babies · girls
1 in 3,136
- Highest: 1 in 3,136 girls born in 1997 were named Keely (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 25,512 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 28.8% of all girls named Keely (3,659) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 210 | #965 (1959) | #2,347 |
| 1960s | 741 | #965 (1969) | #1,358 |
| 1970s | 1,305 | #822 (1978) | #1,000 |
| 1980s | 1,733 | #792 (1984) | #919 |
| 1990s | 3,342 | #455 (1997) | #703 |
| 2000s | 3,659 | #610 (2000) | #738 |
| 2010s | 1,258 | #1,143 (2010) | #1,849 |
| 2020s | 450 | #2,053 (2024) | #2,430 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Keely ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: