Keisha
- #2,719 for girls in 2025, 63 births
- Last seen for boys in 1989 at #7,905
- Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1976 · 1,027 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 22,293since 1961
Keisha over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Keisha has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,719 | 63 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,559 | 69 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,517 | 70 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,653 | 42 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,250 | 49 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,399 | 45 | — | |
| 2019 | #3,499 | 44 | — | |
| 2018 | #4,001 | 36 | — | |
| 2017 | #3,996 | 37 | — | |
| 2016 | #4,990 | 27 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,927 | 59 | — | |
| 2014 | #3,184 | 51 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,533 | 70 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,832 | 61 | — | |
| 2011 | #2,483 | 73 | — | |
| 2010 | #2,870 | 60 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,252 | 51 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,267 | 86 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,457 | 76 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,939 | 103 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,073 | 90 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,962 | 95 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,243 | 76 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,510 | 125 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,422 | 133 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,369 | 136 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,154 | 169 | — | |
| 1998 | #998 | 200 | — | |
| 1997 | #802 | 259 | — | |
| 1996 | #625 | 360 | — | |
| 1995 | #648 | 333 | — | |
| 1994 | #615 | 361 | — | |
| 1993 | #593 | 396 | — | |
| 1992 | #517 | 458 | — | |
| 1991 | #429 | 590 | — | |
| 1990 | #397 | 657 | — | |
| 1989 | #361 | 710 | #7,905 | 5 |
| 1988 | #371 | 651 | — | |
| 1987 | #324 | 752 | — | |
| 1986 | #330 | 733 | — | |
| 1985 | #355 | 666 | — | |
| 1984 | #409 | 519 | — | |
| 1983 | #381 | 582 | — | |
| 1982 | #352 | 666 | — | |
| 1981 | #329 | 720 | — | |
| 1980 | #279 | 883 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #257 | 938 | #4,842 | 7 |
| 1978 | #246 | 984 | — | |
| 1977 | #237 | 1,050 | — | |
| 1976 | #233 | 1,027 | #4,935 | 6 |
| 1975 | #241 | 1,015 | #4,309 | 7 |
| 1974 | #257 | 979 | #3,558 | 9 |
| 1973 | #259 | 963 | #5,101 | 5 |
| 1972 | #303 | 804 | — | |
| 1971 | #367 | 647 | — | |
| 1970 | #448 | 490 | — | |
| 1969 | #541 | 330 | — | |
| 1968 | #720 | 184 | — | |
| 1967 | #833 | 145 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,119 | 89 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,109 | 90 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,666 | 48 | — | |
| 1963 | #5,296 | 7 | — | |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | — | |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1961
The first year at least five girls were named Keisha! It came in at #5,851, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1961–1963, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Keisha is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida | #959 | 16 | 1 in 5,423 |
| Ohio | #1,438 | 5 | 1 in 9,454 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Keisha
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 160 spots since 2024 (#2,559 → #2,719)
- 680 spots since 2020 (#3,399 → #2,719)
- Biggest jump: 286 spots in 1967
- Biggest drop: 196 spots in 1998
Rise & fade · girls
15 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1961
- Peaked 1976 at #233 (1,027 births)
- Births halved by 1992, 16 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 32 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 32 yrs · run 1967–1998
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,427
- Highest: 1 in 1,427 girls born in 1976 were named Keisha (0.07%)
- Latest: 1 in 25,512 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1970s
- 39.9% of all girls named Keisha (8,897) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 904 | #541 (1969) | #2,635 |
| 1970s | 8,897 | #233 (1976) | #285 |
| 1980s | 6,882 | #279 (1980) | #349 |
| 1990s | 3,783 | #397 (1990) | #678 |
| 2000s | 971 | #1,369 (2000) | #2,049 |
| 2010s | 518 | #2,483 (2011) | #3,332 |
| 2020s | 338 | #2,517 (2023) | #3,016 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Keisha ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: