Kelcey
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #9,556 · Last seen for boys in 2023 at #12,239
Given to girls 75.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1993 · 161 births
- Debut · girls
- 14 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,123since 1958
Kelcey over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | #9,556 | 10 | — | |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | #15,251 | 5 | — | |
| 2020 | #15,088 | 5 | — | |
| 2019 | #13,799 | 6 | — | |
| 2018 | #13,793 | 6 | — | |
| 2017 | #9,943 | 10 | — | |
| 2016 | #10,113 | 10 | — | |
| 2015 | #8,931 | 12 | — | |
| 2014 | #6,987 | 17 | — | |
| 2013 | #11,969 | 8 | — | |
| 2012 | #6,576 | 19 | — | |
| 2011 | #6,855 | 18 | — | |
| 2010 | #5,771 | 23 | — | |
| 2009 | #4,370 | 34 | #6,436 | 13 |
| 2008 | #4,448 | 34 | — | |
| 2007 | #4,131 | 37 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #4,265 | 34 | #6,904 | 11 |
| 2005 | #4,373 | 31 | — | |
| 2004 | #4,172 | 33 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #3,869 | 35 | #8,643 | 7 |
| 2002 | #3,654 | 36 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | #2,844 | 51 | #10,556 | 5 |
| 2000 | #3,271 | 41 | #7,416 | 8 |
| 1999 | #2,610 | 54 | #5,035 | 13 |
| 1998 | #1,867 | 82 | #8,479 | 6 |
| 1997 | #1,828 | 81 | #6,100 | 9 |
| 1996 | #1,711 | 88 | #9,015 | 5 |
| 1995 | #1,550 | 98 | #5,124 | 11 |
| 1994 | #1,259 | 136 | #3,596 | 18 |
| 1993 | #1,113 | 161 | #4,020 | 15 |
| 1992 | #1,131 | 156 | #3,604 | 17 |
| 1991 | #1,173 | 149 | #2,544 | 27 |
| 1990 | #1,468 | 106 | #2,780 | 23 |
| 1989 | #1,301 | 121 | #2,359 | 28 |
| 1988 | #1,839 | 67 | #2,765 | 20 |
| 1987 | #2,332 | 45 | #2,057 | 29 |
| 1986 | #2,973 | 31 | #2,510 | 21 |
| 1985 | #3,852 | 21 | #4,052 | 10 |
| 1984 | #3,233 | 26 | #5,561 | 6 |
| 1983 | #4,884 | 14 | #2,787 | 16 |
| 1982 | #4,347 | 17 | #2,426 | 20 |
| 1981 | #4,344 | 17 | #2,418 | 20 |
| 1980 | #7,418 | 8 | #2,965 | 15 |
| 1979 | #6,189 | 10 | #1,943 | 27 |
| 1978 | #4,459 | 15 | #1,870 | 27 |
| 1977 | #5,532 | 11 | #2,131 | 22 |
| 1976 | #4,905 | 12 | #1,646 | 32 |
| 1975 | #5,161 | 11 | #1,407 | 39 |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 | #1,546 | 32 |
| 1973 | #5,191 | 10 | #1,928 | 22 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #1,721 | 26 |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | #1,916 | 22 |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | #1,794 | 24 |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | #2,308 | 14 |
| 1968 | — | #2,907 | 9 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | — | |
| 1958 | #3,232 | 14 | — | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1958
The first year at least five girls were named Kelcey! It came in at #3,232, and was given to 14 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1959–1968, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Kelcey
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2024
Rise & fade · girls
35 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1958
- Peaked 1993 at #1,113 (161 births)
- Births halved by 1999, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 11,236
- Highest: 1 in 11,236 girls born in 1993 were named Kelcey (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 162,019 girls born in 2024 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1990s
- 52.3% of all girls named Kelcey (1,111) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1984
- Mostly boys until 1983, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 19 | #3,232 (1958) | #4,739 |
| 1960s | 7 | #5,974 (1969) | #5,974 |
| 1970s | 98 | #4,459 (1978) | #5,766 |
| 1980s | 367 | #1,301 (1989) | #3,652 |
| 1990s | 1,111 | #1,113 (1993) | #1,571 |
| 2000s | 366 | #2,844 (2001) | #3,940 |
| 2010s | 129 | #5,771 (2010) | #9,474 |
| 2020s | 26 | #9,556 (2024) | #13,339 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Kelcey ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: