Kendyl
- #4,172 for girls in 2025, 34 births
- Last seen for boys in 2023 at #10,821
- Given to girls 97.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2012 · 264 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,098since 1963
Kendyl over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Kendyl has never cracked the top 900 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,172 | 34 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,695 | 41 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,428 | 46 | #10,821 | 6 |
| 2022 | #3,893 | 38 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,751 | 62 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,682 | 62 | #9,554 | 7 |
| 2019 | #2,043 | 93 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #2,179 | 86 | #10,760 | 6 |
| 2017 | #2,074 | 94 | #12,246 | 5 |
| 2016 | #1,465 | 157 | #12,185 | 5 |
| 2015 | #1,307 | 182 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #1,134 | 221 | #10,717 | 6 |
| 2013 | #1,046 | 236 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #966 | 264 | #9,709 | 7 |
| 2011 | #985 | 260 | #8,767 | 8 |
| 2010 | #1,082 | 230 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #1,040 | 250 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #1,117 | 231 | #11,037 | 6 |
| 2007 | #1,322 | 184 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #1,222 | 197 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | #1,168 | 197 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,082 | 212 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,284 | 162 | #10,894 | 5 |
| 2002 | #1,558 | 120 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #1,573 | 118 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,310 | 145 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #1,654 | 100 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,481 | 115 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,449 | 114 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,510 | 106 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,466 | 109 | #7,792 | 6 |
| 1994 | #1,408 | 114 | #7,770 | 6 |
| 1993 | #1,495 | 106 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #1,855 | 76 | #5,660 | 9 |
| 1991 | #3,036 | 37 | — | |
| 1990 | #2,737 | 42 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,165 | 33 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,803 | 37 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,434 | 42 | — | |
| 1986 | #3,054 | 30 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,084 | 29 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,527 | 23 | — | |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | — | |
| 1982 | #6,371 | 10 | — | |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | — | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | — | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | — | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | — | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | — | |
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1963
The first year at least five girls were named Kendyl! It came in at #5,891, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1965, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Kendyl is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Kendyl in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Kendyl
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 1,490 spots since 2020 (#2,682 → #4,172)
- Biggest jump: 97 spots in 2011
- Biggest drop: 80 spots in 2013
Rise & fade · girls
49 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1963
- Peaked 2012 at #966 (264 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 5 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 2 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · run 2011–2012
Share of babies · girls
1 in 6,671
- Highest: 1 in 6,671 girls born in 2012 were named Kendyl (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 47,273 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 35.8% of all girls named Kendyl (1,823) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 21 | #5,008 (1964) | #5,391 |
| 1970s | 22 | #6,619 (1971) | #8,726 |
| 1980s | 214 | #2,434 (1987) | #5,014 |
| 1990s | 919 | #1,408 (1994) | #1,809 |
| 2000s | 1,816 | #1,040 (2009) | #1,268 |
| 2010s | 1,823 | #966 (2012) | #1,428 |
| 2020s | 283 | #2,682 (2020) | #3,437 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Kendyl ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: