Keshawn
- Last seen for girls in 2007 at #17,636
- #2,991 for boys in 2025, 41 births
- Given to boys 94.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2000 · 380 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 6,029since 1973
Keshawn over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,991 | 41 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,393 | 58 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,541 | 52 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,053 | 40 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,134 | 67 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,977 | 72 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,150 | 66 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,325 | 57 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,958 | 73 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,875 | 79 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,804 | 83 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,857 | 79 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,427 | 116 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,346 | 126 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,305 | 131 | |
| 2010 | — | #997 | 196 | |
| 2009 | — | #883 | 238 | |
| 2008 | — | #872 | 243 | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #831 | 259 |
| 2006 | — | #823 | 247 | |
| 2005 | — | #736 | 275 | |
| 2004 | — | #634 | 332 | |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #603 | 350 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #644 | 301 |
| 2001 | #11,020 | 8 | #565 | 368 |
| 2000 | #6,487 | 16 | #555 | 380 |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | #596 | 319 |
| 1998 | #5,799 | 17 | #658 | 262 |
| 1997 | #7,742 | 11 | #661 | 248 |
| 1996 | #6,723 | 13 | #707 | 224 |
| 1995 | #4,677 | 21 | #1,043 | 114 |
| 1994 | #5,249 | 18 | #1,231 | 88 |
| 1993 | #4,826 | 20 | #1,358 | 71 |
| 1992 | #6,314 | 14 | #1,598 | 55 |
| 1991 | #5,399 | 17 | #1,632 | 51 |
| 1990 | #6,465 | 13 | #1,755 | 45 |
| 1989 | #6,531 | 12 | #2,245 | 30 |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #2,035 | 31 |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | #3,731 | 12 |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | #2,510 | 21 |
| 1985 | #7,563 | 8 | #4,698 | 8 |
| 1984 | #4,478 | 16 | #2,613 | 18 |
| 1983 | #6,212 | 10 | #3,884 | 10 |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | #3,482 | 12 |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | #2,779 | 16 |
| 1980 | #6,319 | 10 | #4,134 | 9 |
| 1979 | #6,696 | 9 | #3,168 | 13 |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #3,215 | 12 |
| 1977 | #5,888 | 10 | #4,582 | 7 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | #2,946 | 13 |
| 1975 | #6,484 | 8 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | #4,505 | 6 | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1973
The first year at least five boys were named Keshawn! It came in at #4,505, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1974–1975, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Keshawn is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Keshawn in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Keshawn
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 1,014 spots since 2020 (#1,977 → #2,991)
- Biggest jump: 336 spots in 1996
- Biggest drop: 308 spots in 2011
Rise & fade · boys
27 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1973
- Peaked 2000 at #555 (380 births)
- Births halved by 2011, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 15 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 15 yrs · run 1996–2010
Share of babies · boys
1 in 5,168
- Highest: 1 in 5,168 boys born in 2000 were named Keshawn (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 41,660 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 49.6% of all boys named Keshawn (2,993) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1988
- Mostly girls until 1987, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 56 | #2,946 (1976) | #3,980 |
| 1980s | 167 | #2,035 (1988) | #3,211 |
| 1990s | 1,477 | #596 (1999) | #1,124 |
| 2000s | 2,993 | #555 (2000) | #715 |
| 2010s | 1,006 | #997 (2010) | #1,704 |
| 2020s | 330 | #1,977 (2020) | #2,515 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Keshawn ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: