Keziah
- #766 for girls in 2025, 354 births
- #4,249 for boys in 2025, 24 births
- Given to girls 96.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 354 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,889since 1972
Keziah over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Keziah has never cracked the top 700 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #766 | 354 | #4,249 | 24 |
| 2024 | #867 | 312 | #5,241 | 18 |
| 2023 | #1,051 | 239 | #5,470 | 17 |
| 2022 | #1,117 | 221 | #6,828 | 12 |
| 2021 | #1,103 | 224 | #6,032 | 14 |
| 2020 | #1,165 | 200 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2019 | #1,280 | 181 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #1,284 | 178 | #5,770 | 15 |
| 2017 | #1,379 | 167 | #8,140 | 9 |
| 2016 | #1,365 | 173 | #10,744 | 6 |
| 2015 | #1,416 | 163 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,446 | 157 | #12,108 | 5 |
| 2013 | #1,514 | 145 | #10,728 | 6 |
| 2012 | #1,612 | 134 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,577 | 138 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,546 | 144 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #1,695 | 131 | #9,864 | 7 |
| 2008 | #1,508 | 154 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #1,579 | 143 | #8,915 | 8 |
| 2006 | #1,809 | 113 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,631 | 123 | #8,299 | 8 |
| 2004 | #1,781 | 107 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,720 | 110 | #10,894 | 5 |
| 2002 | #1,642 | 112 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,151 | 76 | #9,243 | 6 |
| 2000 | #1,900 | 89 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,073 | 74 | #8,704 | 6 |
| 1998 | #2,614 | 52 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,733 | 45 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,423 | 53 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,623 | 47 | — | |
| 1994 | #3,038 | 38 | #7,770 | 6 |
| 1993 | #4,826 | 20 | — | |
| 1992 | #4,236 | 24 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,722 | 28 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,813 | 27 | — | |
| 1989 | #4,522 | 20 | — | |
| 1988 | #5,321 | 15 | — | |
| 1987 | #7,353 | 9 | — | |
| 1986 | #5,757 | 12 | — | |
| 1985 | #5,077 | 14 | — | |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | — | |
| 1983 | #5,457 | 12 | — | |
| 1982 | #4,025 | 19 | — | |
| 1981 | #5,885 | 11 | — | |
| 1980 | #4,148 | 18 | — | |
| 1979 | #5,092 | 13 | — | |
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | — | |
| 1977 | #6,340 | 9 | — | |
| 1976 | #5,601 | 10 | — | |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | — | |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | — | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | — | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1972
The first year at least five girls were named Keziah! It came in at #8,292, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1972–1974, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Keziah is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Oklahoma#483 · 1 in 1,848
- Arkansas#489 · 1 in 1,766
- Tennessee#497 · 1 in 2,138
- Mississippi#514 · 1 in 1,780
- South Carolina#519 · 1 in 2,032
Best ever in a state: #268 in Mississippi, 2024.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #483 | 8 | 1 in 1,848 |
| Arkansas | #489 | 6 | 1 in 1,766 |
| Tennessee | #497 | 15 | 1 in 2,138 |
| Mississippi | #514 | 5 | 1 in 1,780 |
| South Carolina | #519 | 9 | 1 in 2,032 |
| Louisiana | #534 | 8 | 1 in 2,046 |
| Virginia | #541 | 14 | 1 in 2,410 |
| Florida | #542 | 33 | 1 in 2,629 |
| Georgia | #581 | 18 | 1 in 2,512 |
| Michigan | #589 | 13 | 1 in 2,749 |
| North Carolina | #634 | 16 | 1 in 2,905 |
| Maryland | #651 | 7 | 1 in 2,855 |
| Ohio | #668 | 14 | 1 in 3,377 |
| Wisconsin | #700 | 6 | 1 in 3,376 |
| Pennsylvania | #763 | 12 | 1 in 3,891 |
| Texas | #780 | 38 | 1 in 4,225 |
| Colorado | #789 | 6 | 1 in 3,888 |
| New York | #790 | 20 | 1 in 3,916 |
| Washington | #811 | 7 | 1 in 4,123 |
| Arizona | #818 | 7 | 1 in 4,031 |
| Minnesota | #835 | 5 | 1 in 4,296 |
| Massachusetts | #873 | 5 | 1 in 4,806 |
| Missouri | #926 | 5 | 1 in 4,860 |
| New Jersey | #939 | 7 | 1 in 5,071 |
| Indiana | #1,032 | 5 | 1 in 5,582 |
| California | #1,228 | 20 | 1 in 8,086 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Keziah
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 399 spots since 2020 (#1,165 → #766)
- Biggest jump: 184 spots in 2024
Rise & fade · girls
53 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1972
- Peaked 2025 at #766 (354 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 2 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · run 2024–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 4,540
- Highest: 1 in 4,540 girls born in 2025 were named Keziah (0.02%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 32.3% of all girls named Keziah (1,580) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 58 | #5,092 (1979) | #6,808 |
| 1980s | 135 | #4,025 (1982) | #5,797 |
| 1990s | 408 | #2,073 (1999) | #3,210 |
| 2000s | 1,158 | #1,508 (2008) | #1,742 |
| 2010s | 1,580 | #1,280 (2019) | #1,442 |
| 2020s | 1,550 | #766 (2025) | #1,012 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Keziah ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: