Kiley
#2,778 for girls in 2025, 61 births · Last seen for boys in 2016 at #12,185
Given to girls 94.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2008 · 1,090 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 19,175since 1958
Kiley over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,778 | 61 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,889 | 57 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,789 | 61 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,579 | 68 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,309 | 79 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,818 | 108 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,789 | 114 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,506 | 145 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,268 | 186 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,164 | 216 | #12,185 | 5 |
| 2015 | #897 | 307 | — | |
| 2014 | #660 | 433 | — | |
| 2013 | #533 | 560 | — | |
| 2012 | #512 | 595 | — | |
| 2011 | #422 | 737 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #378 | 840 | — | |
| 2009 | #359 | 895 | #8,985 | 8 |
| 2008 | #307 | 1,090 | #9,019 | 8 |
| 2007 | #367 | 887 | — | |
| 2006 | #428 | 742 | — | |
| 2005 | #384 | 815 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #373 | 840 | #6,976 | 10 |
| 2003 | #360 | 850 | #5,558 | 13 |
| 2002 | #399 | 731 | #8,456 | 7 |
| 2001 | #429 | 643 | #4,890 | 15 |
| 2000 | #451 | 628 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #452 | 590 | #3,834 | 19 |
| 1998 | #537 | 466 | #3,849 | 18 |
| 1997 | #561 | 417 | #4,451 | 14 |
| 1996 | #575 | 401 | #3,678 | 18 |
| 1995 | #615 | 360 | #3,191 | 21 |
| 1994 | #685 | 307 | #4,094 | 15 |
| 1993 | #686 | 318 | #3,141 | 21 |
| 1992 | #700 | 308 | #2,834 | 24 |
| 1991 | #709 | 298 | #3,325 | 18 |
| 1990 | #752 | 276 | #2,308 | 30 |
| 1989 | #688 | 294 | #2,206 | 31 |
| 1988 | #762 | 245 | #2,765 | 20 |
| 1987 | #822 | 212 | #2,942 | 17 |
| 1986 | #967 | 163 | #2,096 | 27 |
| 1985 | #931 | 169 | #1,916 | 30 |
| 1984 | #867 | 175 | #2,437 | 20 |
| 1983 | #902 | 167 | #1,711 | 33 |
| 1982 | #942 | 158 | #2,426 | 20 |
| 1981 | #1,093 | 127 | #2,138 | 24 |
| 1980 | #750 | 221 | #1,619 | 36 |
| 1979 | #632 | 275 | #1,532 | 38 |
| 1978 | #619 | 273 | #1,299 | 48 |
| 1977 | #2,606 | 32 | #1,707 | 31 |
| 1976 | #2,027 | 43 | #1,373 | 42 |
| 1975 | #2,516 | 31 | #1,084 | 60 |
| 1974 | #2,172 | 37 | #1,099 | 56 |
| 1973 | #2,753 | 25 | #1,108 | 54 |
| 1972 | #2,523 | 28 | #960 | 71 |
| 1971 | #2,955 | 23 | #910 | 80 |
| 1970 | #3,712 | 16 | #1,103 | 55 |
| 1969 | #5,456 | 8 | #2,861 | 10 |
| 1968 | #6,246 | 6 | #2,311 | 13 |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | — | |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | — | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kiley! It came in at #6,103, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1958–1963, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Kiley is popular in 2013
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maine#180 · 1 in 593
- Kentucky#204 · 1 in 881
- Mississippi#237 · 1 in 910
- Tennessee#259 · 1 in 1,101
- Iowa#262 · 1 in 1,064
Best ever in a state: #113 in Maine, 2007.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maine | #180 | 6 | 1 in 593 |
| Kentucky | #204 | 21 | 1 in 881 |
| Mississippi | #237 | 12 | 1 in 910 |
| Tennessee | #259 | 27 | 1 in 1,101 |
| Iowa | #262 | 12 | 1 in 1,064 |
| Arkansas | #326 | 9 | 1 in 1,256 |
| Florida | #364 | 47 | 1 in 1,727 |
| New Mexico | #390 | 5 | 1 in 1,349 |
| Alabama | #393 | 11 | 1 in 1,698 |
| Missouri | #409 | 15 | 1 in 1,801 |
| Illinois | #415 | 29 | 1 in 1,998 |
| Pennsylvania | #419 | 25 | 1 in 2,083 |
| Virginia | #426 | 18 | 1 in 2,016 |
| North Carolina | #435 | 22 | 1 in 2,014 |
| Ohio | #436 | 24 | 1 in 2,191 |
| Wisconsin | #457 | 11 | 1 in 2,097 |
| Georgia | #460 | 21 | 1 in 2,217 |
| Louisiana | #484 | 10 | 1 in 2,015 |
| South Carolina | #497 | 8 | 1 in 2,190 |
| Massachusetts | #507 | 10 | 1 in 2,538 |
| Michigan | #513 | 16 | 1 in 2,602 |
| Minnesota | #553 | 9 | 1 in 2,685 |
| Oregon | #557 | 6 | 1 in 2,503 |
| Maryland | #598 | 8 | 1 in 2,940 |
| Washington | #617 | 10 | 1 in 2,982 |
| Texas | #657 | 45 | 1 in 3,577 |
| Colorado | #684 | 7 | 1 in 3,246 |
| Arizona | #699 | 9 | 1 in 3,414 |
| Indiana | #798 | 7 | 1 in 4,262 |
| California | #832 | 40 | 1 in 5,129 |
| New York | #1,107 | 13 | 1 in 7,020 |
| New Jersey | #1,150 | 5 | 1 in 7,299 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kiley
- 111 spots since 2024 (#2,889 → #2,778)
- 960 spots since 2020 (#1,818 → #2,778)
- 1,881 spots since 2015 (#897 → #2,778)
- Biggest jump: 1,987 spots in 1978 (#2,606 → #619)
- Biggest drop: 343 spots in 1981 (#750 → #1,093)
- Debuted 1958
- Peaked 2008 at #307 (1,090 births)
- Births halved by 2014, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 37 yrs · run 1982–2015
- Highest: 1 in 1,735 girls born in 2008 were named Kiley (0.06%)
- Latest: 1 in 26,349 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 42.4% of all girls named Kiley (8,121) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1975, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 5 | #6,103 (1958) | #6,103 |
| 1960s | 27 | #5,008 (1964) | #5,826 |
| 1970s | 783 | #619 (1978) | #2,252 |
| 1980s | 1,931 | #688 (1989) | #872 |
| 1990s | 3,741 | #452 (1999) | #627 |
| 2000s | 8,121 | #307 (2008) | #386 |
| 2010s | 4,133 | #378 (2010) | #913 |
| 2020s | 434 | #1,818 (2020) | #2,527 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kiley in 2013
Top girls' names in 2013
More about 2013
girls
1,754,746 girls got a published name in 2013; 1 in 3,133 of them was named Kiley, which outranked 97.2% of the 19,279 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.