Kimberleigh
- #13,208 for girls in 2025, 6 births
- Peak · girls
- 1966 · 16 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 741since 1956
Kimberleigh over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Kimberleigh has never cracked the top 3,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #13,208 | 6 |
| 2024 | — | |
| 2023 | #15,194 | 5 |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 |
| 2021 | — | |
| 2020 | #13,453 | 6 |
| 2019 | #9,736 | 10 |
| 2018 | — | |
| 2017 | #12,713 | 7 |
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 |
| 2015 | #16,419 | 5 |
| 2014 | #10,129 | 10 |
| 2013 | #11,969 | 8 |
| 2012 | #10,429 | 10 |
| 2011 | #8,196 | 14 |
| 2010 | #7,217 | 17 |
| 2009 | #10,679 | 10 |
| 2008 | #10,084 | 11 |
| 2007 | #10,129 | 11 |
| 2006 | #13,606 | 7 |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 |
| 2004 | #11,624 | 8 |
| 2003 | #7,998 | 13 |
| 2002 | #6,698 | 16 |
| 2001 | #8,758 | 11 |
| 2000 | #5,937 | 18 |
| 1999 | #6,191 | 16 |
| 1998 | #6,719 | 14 |
| 1997 | #4,819 | 21 |
| 1996 | #6,064 | 15 |
| 1995 | #3,969 | 26 |
| 1994 | #8,122 | 10 |
| 1993 | #4,826 | 20 |
| 1992 | #6,008 | 15 |
| 1991 | #5,399 | 17 |
| 1990 | #6,465 | 13 |
| 1989 | #4,670 | 19 |
| 1988 | #6,666 | 11 |
| 1987 | #5,074 | 15 |
| 1986 | #5,188 | 14 |
| 1985 | #6,031 | 11 |
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 |
| 1981 | #5,571 | 12 |
| 1980 | #8,178 | 7 |
| 1979 | #6,189 | 10 |
| 1978 | — | |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 |
| 1976 | #4,154 | 15 |
| 1975 | #5,161 | 11 |
| 1974 | #4,459 | 13 |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 |
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 |
| 1970 | #3,311 | 19 |
| 1969 | #4,198 | 12 |
| 1968 | #3,789 | 13 |
| 1967 | #4,982 | 8 |
| 1966 | #3,148 | 16 |
| 1965 | #4,202 | 10 |
| 1964 | #3,515 | 14 |
| 1963 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,161 | 16 |
| 1961 | #4,239 | 10 |
| 1960 | #4,184 | 10 |
| 1959 | #4,031 | 10 |
| 1958 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 |
| 1956 | #4,161 | 9 |
| 1955 | — | |
| 1954 | — | |
| 1953 | — | |
| 1952 | — | |
| 1951 | — | |
| 1950 | — | |
| 1949 | — | |
| 1948 | — | |
| 1947 | — | |
| 1946 | — | |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | — | |
| 1943 | — | |
| 1942 | — | |
| 1941 | — | |
| 1940 | — | |
| 1939 | — | |
| 1938 | — | |
| 1937 | — | |
| 1936 | — | |
| 1935 | — | |
| 1934 | — | |
| 1933 | — | |
| 1932 | — | |
| 1931 | — | |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | — | |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
First appearance
1956
The first year at least five girls were named Kimberleigh! It came in at #4,161, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1958, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Kimberleigh is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Kimberleigh in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Kimberleigh
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 245 spots since 2020 (#13,453 → #13,208)
- 3,211 spots since 2015 (#16,419 → #13,208)
Rise & fade · girls
10 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1956
- Peaked 1966 at #3,148 (16 births)
- Births halved by 1967, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 67,636
- Highest: 1 in 67,636 girls born in 1995 were named Kimberleigh (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 267,878 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #3,148 in 1966, was only 1 in 105,761 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1990s
- 22.5% of all girls named Kimberleigh (167) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 26 | #4,031 (1959) | #4,370 |
| 1960s | 109 | #3,148 (1966) | #3,935 |
| 1970s | 99 | #3,311 (1970) | #5,489 |
| 1980s | 112 | #4,670 (1989) | #6,429 |
| 1990s | 167 | #3,969 (1995) | #5,858 |
| 2000s | 116 | #5,937 (2000) | #9,497 |
| 2010s | 87 | #7,217 (2010) | #11,238 |
| 2020s | 25 | #11,231 (2022) | #13,272 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Kimberleigh ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: