Kingsley
- #1,710 for girls in 2025, 119 births
- #1,095 for boys in 2025, 196 births
- Given to boys 75.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2016 · 473 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 6,709since 1907
Kingsley over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,710 | 119 | #1,095 | 196 |
| 2024 | #1,664 | 123 | #983 | 229 |
| 2023 | #1,391 | 161 | #849 | 286 |
| 2022 | #1,190 | 202 | #738 | 350 |
| 2021 | #1,095 | 226 | #702 | 376 |
| 2020 | #1,050 | 238 | #625 | 429 |
| 2019 | #1,755 | 117 | #643 | 418 |
| 2018 | #1,925 | 103 | #643 | 403 |
| 2017 | #1,505 | 147 | #653 | 394 |
| 2016 | #1,693 | 126 | #584 | 473 |
| 2015 | #1,758 | 119 | #749 | 323 |
| 2014 | #2,412 | 75 | #760 | 309 |
| 2013 | #3,267 | 49 | #927 | 220 |
| 2012 | #3,040 | 55 | #863 | 244 |
| 2011 | #4,353 | 33 | #991 | 196 |
| 2010 | #3,470 | 46 | #980 | 201 |
| 2009 | #4,013 | 38 | #1,755 | 87 |
| 2008 | #4,448 | 34 | #2,028 | 69 |
| 2007 | #5,230 | 27 | #2,765 | 43 |
| 2006 | #7,142 | 17 | #2,881 | 39 |
| 2005 | #8,330 | 13 | #3,319 | 30 |
| 2004 | #9,892 | 10 | #4,793 | 17 |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #3,443 | 26 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #2,470 | 40 |
| 2001 | #9,351 | 10 | #3,321 | 26 |
| 2000 | — | #2,674 | 34 | |
| 1999 | — | #3,591 | 21 | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #2,312 | 38 |
| 1997 | #9,017 | 9 | #3,160 | 23 |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #2,838 | 26 |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | #2,685 | 27 |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | #2,392 | 32 |
| 1993 | — | #2,399 | 31 | |
| 1992 | — | #2,128 | 36 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #2,828 | 23 |
| 1990 | — | #2,553 | 26 | |
| 1989 | — | #2,206 | 31 | |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | #2,305 | 26 |
| 1987 | — | #2,400 | 23 | |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | #2,096 | 27 |
| 1985 | — | #1,975 | 29 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,036 | 26 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,017 | 26 | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | #1,890 | 29 |
| 1981 | — | #2,418 | 20 | |
| 1980 | — | #3,430 | 12 | |
| 1979 | — | #3,168 | 13 | |
| 1978 | — | #2,929 | 14 | |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | #2,270 | 20 |
| 1976 | — | #3,471 | 10 | |
| 1975 | — | #2,902 | 13 | |
| 1974 | — | #3,558 | 9 | |
| 1973 | — | #2,216 | 18 | |
| 1972 | — | #3,152 | 10 | |
| 1971 | — | #3,658 | 8 | |
| 1970 | — | #2,621 | 13 | |
| 1969 | — | #3,935 | 6 | |
| 1968 | — | #2,907 | 9 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1966 | — | #3,537 | 6 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,982 | 8 | |
| 1964 | — | #3,050 | 8 | |
| 1963 | — | #2,858 | 9 | |
| 1962 | — | #3,041 | 8 | |
| 1961 | — | #3,356 | 7 | |
| 1960 | — | #3,077 | 8 | |
| 1959 | — | #2,663 | 10 | |
| 1958 | — | #2,818 | 9 | |
| 1957 | — | #2,190 | 14 | |
| 1956 | — | #2,969 | 8 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,964 | 8 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,449 | 11 | |
| 1953 | — | #2,531 | 10 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,680 | 9 | |
| 1951 | — | #2,495 | 10 | |
| 1950 | — | #2,207 | 12 | |
| 1949 | — | #2,453 | 10 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,788 | 8 | |
| 1947 | — | #2,169 | 13 | |
| 1946 | — | #2,143 | 12 | |
| 1945 | — | #2,743 | 7 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,738 | 16 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,399 | 25 | |
| 1942 | — | #2,042 | 13 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,821 | 15 | |
| 1940 | — | #2,322 | 10 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,712 | 16 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,868 | 7 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,905 | 7 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,452 | 9 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,719 | 8 | |
| 1934 | — | #3,679 | 5 | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | #1,995 | 14 | |
| 1931 | — | #3,095 | 7 | |
| 1930 | — | #3,022 | 8 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,452 | 11 | |
| 1928 | — | #4,151 | 5 | |
| 1927 | — | #2,523 | 11 | |
| 1926 | — | #3,708 | 6 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,755 | 10 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,894 | 18 | |
| 1923 | — | #3,175 | 8 | |
| 1922 | — | #2,486 | 12 | |
| 1921 | — | #3,517 | 7 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,336 | 13 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,624 | 21 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,165 | 14 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,091 | 14 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,043 | 14 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,621 | 9 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,975 | 11 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,945 | 9 | |
| 1912 | — | #2,544 | 5 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | #1,094 | 7 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1907
The first year at least five boys were named Kingsley! It came in at #1,094, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1908–1912, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Kingsley is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | #571 | 8 | 1 in 2,862 |
| Indiana | #773 | 7 | 1 in 4,523 |
| Minnesota | #807 | 5 | 1 in 4,900 |
| Arizona | #844 | 6 | 1 in 5,454 |
| Georgia | #919 | 9 | 1 in 5,580 |
| Ohio | #940 | 8 | 1 in 6,567 |
| Florida | #1,009 | 13 | 1 in 7,349 |
| North Carolina | #1,028 | 7 | 1 in 7,353 |
| California | #1,040 | 20 | 1 in 8,774 |
| New York | #1,055 | 11 | 1 in 7,675 |
| Virginia | #1,089 | 5 | 1 in 7,451 |
| Michigan | #1,113 | 5 | 1 in 8,039 |
| Texas | #1,250 | 16 | 1 in 10,941 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kingsley
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 470 spots since 2020 (#625 → #1,095)
- Biggest jump: 775 spots in 2010
- Biggest drop: 134 spots in 2024
Rise & fade · boys
109 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1907
- Peaked 2016 at #584 (473 births)
- Births halved by 2024, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 15 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 15 yrs · run 2010–2024
Share of babies · boys
1 in 4,012
- Highest: 1 in 4,012 boys born in 2016 were named Kingsley (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 8,715 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 47.4% of all boys named Kingsley (3,181) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 7 | #1,094 (1907) | #1,094 |
| 1910s | 97 | #1,624 (1919) | #2,126 |
| 1920s | 101 | #1,894 (1924) | #2,900 |
| 1930s | 81 | #1,712 (1939) | #2,716 |
| 1940s | 129 | #1,399 (1943) | #2,162 |
| 1950s | 101 | #2,190 (1957) | #2,597 |
| 1960s | 75 | #2,858 (1963) | #3,230 |
| 1970s | 128 | #2,216 (1973) | #2,995 |
| 1980s | 249 | #1,890 (1982) | #2,277 |
| 1990s | 283 | #2,128 (1992) | #2,689 |
| 2000s | 411 | #1,755 (2009) | #2,945 |
| 2010s | 3,181 | #584 (2016) | #779 |
| 2020s | 1,866 | #625 (2020) | #832 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Kingsley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: