Kyleigh
#1,200 for girls in 2025, 190 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #9,948
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2011 · 1,172 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 20,193since 1978
Kyleigh over time
Rank among girls' names. Kyleigh has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,200 | 190 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,070 | 232 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,089 | 226 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,177 | 204 | — | |
| 2021 | #972 | 267 | — | |
| 2020 | #830 | 329 | — | |
| 2019 | #768 | 362 | — | |
| 2018 | #661 | 448 | — | |
| 2017 | #570 | 529 | — | |
| 2016 | #483 | 648 | — | |
| 2015 | #380 | 859 | — | |
| 2014 | #347 | 956 | — | |
| 2013 | #287 | 1,111 | — | |
| 2012 | #289 | 1,096 | — | |
| 2011 | #271 | 1,172 | — | |
| 2010 | #293 | 1,112 | — | |
| 2009 | #311 | 1,055 | — | |
| 2008 | #316 | 1,064 | — | |
| 2007 | #343 | 966 | — | |
| 2006 | #358 | 918 | — | |
| 2005 | #389 | 809 | — | |
| 2004 | #380 | 818 | #9,948 | 6 |
| 2003 | #385 | 787 | — | |
| 2002 | #439 | 662 | — | |
| 2001 | #523 | 509 | — | |
| 2000 | #584 | 443 | — | |
| 1999 | #633 | 372 | — | |
| 1998 | #664 | 347 | — | |
| 1997 | #789 | 264 | — | |
| 1996 | #946 | 203 | — | |
| 1995 | #970 | 194 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,232 | 141 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,131 | 157 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,183 | 148 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,263 | 133 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,688 | 87 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,259 | 125 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,093 | 55 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,129 | 51 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,845 | 33 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,983 | 20 | — | |
| 1984 | #4,318 | 17 | — | |
| 1983 | #3,949 | 19 | — | |
| 1982 | #5,534 | 12 | — | |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | — | |
| 1980 | #5,544 | 12 | — | |
| 1979 | #4,626 | 15 | — | |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 | — | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Kyleigh! It came in at #6,948, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1978, when fewer than 9 girls a year got the name.
Where Kyleigh is popular in 1992
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Indiana#349 · 1 in 2,374
- Oklahoma#469 · 1 in 2,866
- Michigan#594 · 1 in 4,755
- Missouri#640 · 1 in 5,153
- Washington#816 · 1 in 6,156
Best ever in a state: #53 in Mississippi, 2011.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana | #349 | 14 | 1 in 2,374 |
| Oklahoma | #469 | 6 | 1 in 2,866 |
| Michigan | #594 | 12 | 1 in 4,755 |
| Missouri | #640 | 6 | 1 in 5,153 |
| Washington | #816 | 5 | 1 in 6,156 |
| Illinois | #948 | 9 | 1 in 8,364 |
| Ohio | #1,013 | 6 | 1 in 11,324 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,049 | 6 | 1 in 11,410 |
| Florida | #1,443 | 5 | 1 in 15,015 |
| California | #1,492 | 16 | 1 in 16,050 |
| Texas | #1,929 | 6 | 1 in 22,930 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kyleigh
- 130 spots since 2024 (#1,070 → #1,200)
- 370 spots since 2020 (#830 → #1,200)
- 820 spots since 2015 (#380 → #1,200)
- Biggest jump: 262 spots in 1995 (#1,232 → #970)
- Biggest drop: 205 spots in 2022 (#972 → #1,177)
- Debuted 1978
- Peaked 2011 at #271 (1,172 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 27 yrs · run 1995–2021
- Highest: 1 in 1,501 girls born in 2011 were named Kyleigh (0.07%)
- Latest: 1 in 8,459 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 41.1% of all girls named Kyleigh (8,293) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 23 | #4,626 (1979) | #5,787 |
| 1980s | 352 | #1,259 (1989) | #3,906 |
| 1990s | 2,046 | #633 (1999) | #1,050 |
| 2000s | 8,031 | #311 (2009) | #403 |
| 2010s | 8,293 | #271 (2011) | #435 |
| 2020s | 1,448 | #830 (2020) | #1,056 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Kyleigh in 1992
Top girls' names in 1992
More about 1992
girls
1,843,931 girls got a published name in 1992; 1 in 12,459 of them was named Kyleigh, which outranked 92.4% of the 15,610 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,174Malika149
- #1,174Rosalie149
- #1,174Tkeyah149
- #1,183Kyleigh148
- #1,183Chiquita148
- #1,183Francisca148
- #1,183Kirby148
- #1,188Caitlynn147
- #1,188Christi147
- #1,188Daniel147
Tied with 4 names at #1,183; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.