Kyndal
- #3,780 for girls in 2025, 39 births
- Last seen for boys in 2021 at #12,146
- Given to girls 97.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2011 · 276 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,688since 1969
Kyndal over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Kyndal has never cracked the top 900 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,780 | 39 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,575 | 43 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,476 | 45 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,821 | 60 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,366 | 76 | #12,146 | 5 |
| 2020 | #1,965 | 96 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,933 | 102 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #2,026 | 96 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #1,770 | 118 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #1,567 | 142 | #10,744 | 6 |
| 2015 | #1,337 | 177 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,140 | 219 | #12,108 | 5 |
| 2013 | #1,152 | 208 | #12,136 | 5 |
| 2012 | #978 | 257 | #9,709 | 7 |
| 2011 | #934 | 276 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #1,093 | 228 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #1,246 | 198 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #1,200 | 212 | #9,871 | 7 |
| 2007 | #1,308 | 186 | #7,590 | 10 |
| 2006 | #1,381 | 165 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #1,173 | 196 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #1,314 | 162 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,154 | 187 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,468 | 130 | #9,392 | 6 |
| 2001 | #1,726 | 104 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,588 | 111 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #1,738 | 92 | #6,530 | 9 |
| 1998 | #1,526 | 110 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,964 | 73 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,084 | 66 | #9,015 | 5 |
| 1995 | #1,955 | 70 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,810 | 79 | #6,968 | 7 |
| 1993 | #2,289 | 56 | #5,360 | 10 |
| 1992 | #2,830 | 42 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,369 | 32 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,523 | 30 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,165 | 33 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,805 | 24 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,493 | 41 | — | |
| 1986 | #4,028 | 20 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,983 | 20 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,233 | 26 | — | |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 | — | |
| 1982 | #8,224 | 7 | — | |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | — | |
| 1980 | #8,178 | 7 | — | |
| 1979 | #9,010 | 6 | — | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1969
The first year at least five girls were named Kyndal! It came in at #7,471, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1969–1978, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Kyndal is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- North Carolina#1,437 · 1 in 9,297
Best ever in a state: #198 in West Virginia, 2012.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | #1,437 | 5 | 1 in 9,297 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Kyndal
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 1,815 spots since 2020 (#1,965 → #3,780)
- Biggest jump: 159 spots in 2011
- Biggest drop: 174 spots in 2013
Rise & fade · girls
42 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1969
- Peaked 2011 at #934 (276 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 2 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · run 2011–2012
Share of babies · girls
1 in 6,373
- Highest: 1 in 6,373 girls born in 2011 were named Kyndal (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 41,212 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 38.9% of all girls named Kyndal (1,823) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5 | #7,471 (1969) | #7,471 |
| 1970s | 6 | #9,010 (1979) | #9,010 |
| 1980s | 194 | #2,493 (1987) | #5,183 |
| 1990s | 650 | #1,526 (1998) | #2,309 |
| 2000s | 1,651 | #1,154 (2003) | #1,356 |
| 2010s | 1,823 | #934 (2011) | #1,393 |
| 2020s | 359 | #1,965 (2020) | #2,997 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Kyndal ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: