Lamont

Last seen for girls in 1989 at #10,847 · #2,718 for boys in 2025, 47 births
Given to boys 99.3% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1972 · 1,040 births
Debut · boys
5 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
24,024
since 1888

Lamont over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Lamont has never cracked the top 200 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201953peak #214, 1972boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025—#2,71847
2024—#2,59551
2023—#2,34659
2022—#1,90782
2021—#2,07970
2020—#1,74388
2019—#1,84282
2018—#1,80984
2017—#1,510110
2016—#1,478116
2015—#1,416121
2014—#1,300136
2013—#1,269137
2012—#1,151159
2011—#1,082172
2010—#1,102174
2009—#1,045182
2008—#954210
2007—#896224
2006—#976190
2005—#1,018166
2004—#917185
2003—#816214
2002—#875187
2001—#796211
2000—#776214
1999—#721228
1998—#729225
1997—#703226
1996—#712222
1995—#624272
1994—#618285
1993—#569324
1992—#552342
1991—#569314
1990—#572314
1989#10,8476#526332
1988—#521307
1987—#519299
1986—#485326
1985—#511292
1984—#471320
1983#10,2755#469317
1982—#437369
1981#9,1106#414401
1980—#363484
1979#5,75111#346521
1978#5,95810#323541
1977#9,6525#337531
1976#7,2967#300599
1975#4,59313#291659
1974#5,36010#243824
1973#3,12221#234900
1972#3,17720#2141,040
1971#5,5439#350524
1970#5,8188#352534
1969#5,0579#372443
1968#5,6427#377423
1967#6,8045#390375
1966—#408342
1965—#424336
1964#6,0096#433340
1963—#458293
1962—#483268
1961—#483272
1960#5,1687#527225
1959—#493252
1958—#505233
1957—#513225
1956—#525202
1955—#511206
1954—#476232
1953—#494201
1952—#517182
1951—#474204
1950—#477194
1949—#477193
1948—#505171
1947—#561145
1946—#524149
1945—#603101
1944—#604103
1943—#66294
1942—#620103
1941—#62494
1940—#77064
1939—#81156
1938—#95144
1937—#98241
1936—#1,54019
1935—#1,42223
1934—#1,13334
1933—#1,05138
1932—#1,12636
1931—#1,25330
1930—#1,06942
1929—#1,23732
1928—#1,29331
1927—#1,29332
1926—#1,46625
1925—#1,45126
1924—#1,83919
1923—#1,42027
1922—#1,28232
1921—#1,36030
1920—#1,64222
1919—#1,44925
1918—#1,28630
1917—#1,52822
1916—#1,33526
1915—#1,78216
1914—#1,60815
1913—#1,49713
1912—#1,7469
1911—#1,7405
1910——
1909—#1,2776
1908—#1,3735
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888—#1,0315
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1888

The first year at least five boys were named Lamont! It came in at #1,031, and was given to 5 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1888–1908, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Lamont is popular in 1953

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedMNIllinois: #334 for boys · 17 births · 1 in 5,954 boysILWisconsin: #329 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 8,472 boysWIMichigan: #359 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 7,432 boysMINew York: #351 for boys · 26 births · 1 in 6,314 boysNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedINOhio: #484 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 12,900 boysOHPennsylvania: #297 for boys · 19 births · 1 in 6,181 boysPANew Jersey: #230 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 4,075 boysNJConnecticut: #244 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 4,514 boysCTCalifornia: #780 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 24,773 boysCAUtah: #225 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 1,625 boysUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedWVVirginia: #383 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 6,038 boysVAMaryland: #190 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 1,777 boysMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #426 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 6,757 boysNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: #176 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 1,438 boysDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Lamont, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. District of Columbia#176 · 1 in 1,438
  2. Maryland#190 · 1 in 1,777
  3. Utah#225 · 1 in 1,625
  4. New Jersey#230 · 1 in 4,075
  5. Connecticut#244 · 1 in 4,514

Best ever in a state: #69 in District of Columbia, 1972.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
District of Columbia#176101 in 1,438
Maryland#190161 in 1,777
Utah#22571 in 1,625
New Jersey#230131 in 4,075
Connecticut#24451 in 4,514
Pennsylvania#297191 in 6,181
Wisconsin#32951 in 8,472
Illinois#334171 in 5,954
New York#351261 in 6,314
Michigan#359121 in 7,432
Virginia#38371 in 6,038
North Carolina#42681 in 6,757
Ohio#48481 in 12,900
California#78061 in 24,773
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Delaware———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lamont
Momentum · boys
Falling
  • 123 spots since 2024 (#2,595 → #2,718)
  • 975 spots since 2020 (#1,743 → #2,718)
  • 1,302 spots since 2015 (#1,416 → #2,718)
  • Biggest jump: 558 spots in 1937 (#1,540 → #982)
  • Biggest drop: 101 spots in 2004 (#816 → #917)
Rise & fade · boys
84 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1888
  • Peaked 1972 at #214 (1,040 births)
  • Births halved by 1980, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 71 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 71 yrs · run 1937–2004
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,559
  • Highest: 1 in 1,559 boys born in 1972 were named Lamont (0.06%)
  • Latest: 1 in 36,342 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1970s
  • 27.8% of all boys named Lamont (6,673) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s5#1,031 (1888)#1,031
1890s0——
1900s11#1,277 (1909)#1,325
1910s161#1,286 (1918)#1,552
1920s276#1,237 (1929)#1,428
1930s363#811 (1939)#1,134
1940s1,217#477 (1949)#595
1950s2,131#474 (1951)#499
1960s3,317#372 (1969)#436
1970s6,673#214 (1972)#299
1980s3,447#363 (1980)#472
1990s2,752#552 (1992)#637
2000s1,983#776 (2000)#907
2010s1,291#1,082 (2011)#1,396
2020s397#1,743 (2020)#2,231

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lamont in 1953

boys
#494
201 births · 1 in 9,812 boys

Top boys' names in 1953

  1. #1Robert86,243
  2. #2James86,066
  3. #3Michael84,198
  4. #4John80,165
  5. #5David76,119
  6. #6William61,829
  7. #7Richard58,389
  8. #8Thomas47,008
  9. #9Charles38,421
  10. #10Gary36,967
  11. #494Lamont201
More about 1953

boys

1,972,299 boys got a published name in 1953; 1 in 9,812 of them was named Lamont, which outranked 88.6% of the 4,341 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lamont
  1. #491Eddy205
  2. #492Jamie204
  3. #492Simon204
  4. #494Lamont201
  5. #494Geary201
  6. #494Reuben201
  7. #497Roscoe199
  8. #498Randell197
  9. #499Gilberto196

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1952
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,276Faron#2,251 → #975
  2. ↑ 694Shane#1,213 → #519
  3. ↑ 528Enrico#1,517 → #989
  4. ↑ 441Blaise#1,430 → #989
  5. ↑ 429Robbin#1,268 → #839
Fallers
  1. ↓ 427Durwood#981 → #1,408
  2. ↓ 392Jonnie#939 → #1,331
  3. ↓ 312Elvis#968 → #1,280
  4. ↓ 293Edsel#968 → #1,261
  5. ↓ 292Beverly#766 → #1,058

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1953 →