Laney
#673 for girls in 2025, 421 births · Last seen for boys in 2007 at #12,367
Given to girls 97.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2005 · 635 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 14,024since 1883
Laney over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Laney has never cracked the top 400 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #673 | 421 | — | |
| 2024 | #689 | 411 | — | |
| 2023 | #658 | 447 | — | |
| 2022 | #704 | 419 | — | |
| 2021 | #652 | 458 | — | |
| 2020 | #650 | 444 | — | |
| 2019 | #697 | 415 | — | |
| 2018 | #730 | 388 | — | |
| 2017 | #669 | 439 | — | |
| 2016 | #768 | 370 | — | |
| 2015 | #641 | 445 | — | |
| 2014 | #637 | 449 | — | |
| 2013 | #678 | 418 | — | |
| 2012 | #629 | 454 | — | |
| 2011 | #522 | 557 | — | |
| 2010 | #545 | 540 | — | |
| 2009 | #537 | 561 | — | |
| 2008 | #567 | 543 | — | |
| 2007 | #532 | 588 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #486 | 640 | — | |
| 2005 | #481 | 635 | — | |
| 2004 | #543 | 527 | #8,927 | 7 |
| 2003 | #558 | 495 | — | |
| 2002 | #627 | 407 | — | |
| 2001 | #614 | 408 | — | |
| 2000 | #703 | 332 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,077 | 186 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,636 | 99 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,552 | 104 | #9,265 | 5 |
| 1996 | #1,609 | 96 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,669 | 88 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,688 | 88 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,045 | 67 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,704 | 88 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,656 | 90 | #8,236 | 5 |
| 1990 | #1,670 | 88 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #2,769 | 40 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,690 | 25 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,424 | 26 | — | |
| 1986 | #3,360 | 26 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,246 | 27 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,329 | 25 | — | |
| 1983 | #3,555 | 22 | — | |
| 1982 | #3,260 | 26 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,985 | 53 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,134 | 27 | #5,525 | 6 |
| 1979 | #3,668 | 21 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,942 | 27 | — | |
| 1977 | #4,652 | 14 | — | |
| 1976 | #4,154 | 15 | — | |
| 1975 | #5,516 | 10 | — | |
| 1974 | #4,459 | 13 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,971 | 15 | #5,101 | 5 |
| 1972 | #4,300 | 13 | — | |
| 1971 | #4,123 | 14 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | #4,230 | 6 |
| 1969 | #3,318 | 17 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,000 | 12 | #3,365 | 7 |
| 1967 | #4,625 | 9 | #3,966 | 5 |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | #3,249 | 7 |
| 1965 | #4,202 | 10 | #2,982 | 8 |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | — | |
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | #3,318 | 7 |
| 1962 | #4,865 | 8 | #3,305 | 7 |
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 | #3,652 | 6 |
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 | #2,685 | 10 |
| 1959 | #3,254 | 14 | — | |
| 1958 | #4,890 | 7 | #3,275 | 7 |
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | #3,257 | 7 |
| 1956 | #5,325 | 6 | #2,361 | 12 |
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #4,278 | 8 | #2,592 | 10 |
| 1953 | #4,595 | 7 | #3,143 | 7 |
| 1952 | — | #2,875 | 8 | |
| 1951 | #3,106 | 12 | #2,844 | 8 |
| 1950 | — | #1,941 | 15 | |
| 1949 | #2,850 | 13 | #2,453 | 10 |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | #2,027 | 14 |
| 1947 | #3,706 | 9 | #2,356 | 11 |
| 1946 | #3,665 | 8 | #2,403 | 10 |
| 1945 | — | #2,743 | 7 | |
| 1944 | #2,762 | 11 | — | |
| 1943 | — | #3,538 | 5 | |
| 1942 | — | #2,523 | 9 | |
| 1941 | — | #2,491 | 9 | |
| 1940 | #2,963 | 9 | #2,671 | 8 |
| 1939 | — | #2,288 | 10 | |
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 | #2,868 | 7 |
| 1937 | — | #2,680 | 8 | |
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | — | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | #3,449 | 7 | #3,277 | 6 |
| 1933 | — | #3,642 | 5 | |
| 1932 | — | #3,361 | 6 | |
| 1931 | — | #3,390 | 6 | |
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | — | |
| 1928 | #2,954 | 10 | #4,151 | 5 |
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | #2,939 | 11 | — | |
| 1924 | #4,434 | 6 | #3,505 | 7 |
| 1923 | #4,376 | 6 | — | |
| 1922 | #3,655 | 8 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #4,023 | 7 | — | |
| 1920 | #3,598 | 8 | — | |
| 1919 | #3,452 | 8 | — | |
| 1918 | #2,674 | 12 | — | |
| 1917 | #4,594 | 5 | — | |
| 1916 | #3,258 | 8 | #3,177 | 7 |
| 1915 | #3,134 | 8 | — | |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 | — | |
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | #2,140 | 6 | — | |
| 1909 | #2,208 | 5 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,862 | 6 | — | |
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | #1,932 | 5 | — | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | #1,700 | 5 | — | |
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | #1,583 | 5 | — | |
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | #920 | 5 | — | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1883
The first year at least five girls were named Laney! It came in at #920, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1883–1907, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Laney is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Montana#99 · 1 in 328
- Iowa#210 · 1 in 827
- Kansas#221 · 1 in 860
- Missouri#251 · 1 in 1,120
- Idaho#265 · 1 in 967
Best ever in a state: #79 in Wyoming, 2013.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montana | #99 | 9 | 1 in 328 |
| Iowa | #210 | 16 | 1 in 827 |
| Kansas | #221 | 16 | 1 in 860 |
| Missouri | #251 | 25 | 1 in 1,120 |
| Idaho | #265 | 7 | 1 in 967 |
| Arkansas | #272 | 11 | 1 in 1,073 |
| West Virginia | #323 | 5 | 1 in 1,358 |
| Oklahoma | #328 | 13 | 1 in 1,325 |
| Ohio | #335 | 32 | 1 in 1,701 |
| Indiana | #337 | 21 | 1 in 1,509 |
| Georgia | #344 | 32 | 1 in 1,585 |
| Tennessee | #352 | 19 | 1 in 1,606 |
| Utah | #355 | 13 | 1 in 1,465 |
| Mississippi | #371 | 8 | 1 in 1,471 |
| Maryland | #382 | 14 | 1 in 1,766 |
| Alabama | #393 | 12 | 1 in 1,668 |
| Louisiana | #414 | 12 | 1 in 1,721 |
| Nebraska | #436 | 5 | 1 in 1,641 |
| North Carolina | #453 | 21 | 1 in 2,210 |
| Minnesota | #476 | 11 | 1 in 2,254 |
| Illinois | #482 | 26 | 1 in 2,432 |
| Wisconsin | #492 | 10 | 1 in 2,451 |
| Texas | #497 | 66 | 1 in 2,525 |
| Kentucky | #538 | 7 | 1 in 2,755 |
| Michigan | #549 | 14 | 1 in 3,053 |
| Pennsylvania | #558 | 18 | 1 in 3,035 |
| South Carolina | #582 | 7 | 1 in 2,651 |
| Arizona | #607 | 12 | 1 in 2,793 |
| Oregon | #661 | 5 | 1 in 3,127 |
| Massachusetts | #725 | 6 | 1 in 4,374 |
| Washington | #845 | 7 | 1 in 4,480 |
| Virginia | #894 | 7 | 1 in 5,242 |
| Florida | #921 | 15 | 1 in 5,489 |
| California | #1,170 | 27 | 1 in 8,085 |
| New York | #1,992 | 6 | 1 in 15,796 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Laney
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 16 spots since 2024 (#689 → #673)
- 23 spots since 2020 (#650 → #673)
- 32 spots since 2015 (#641 → #673)
- Biggest jump: 374 spots in 2000 (#1,077 → #703)
- Biggest drop: 127 spots in 2016 (#641 → #768)
Rise & fade · girls
122 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1883
- Peaked 2005 at #481 (635 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 27 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 27 yrs · run 2000–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,910
- Highest: 1 in 2,910 girls born in 2005 were named Laney (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,818 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 36.6% of all girls named Laney (5,136) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | #920 (1883) | #920 |
| 1890s | 10 | #1,583 (1896) | #1,642 |
| 1900s | 16 | #1,862 (1908) | #2,001 |
| 1910s | 52 | #2,140 (1910) | #3,267 |
| 1920s | 61 | #2,939 (1925) | #3,819 |
| 1930s | 20 | #3,376 (1936) | #3,557 |
| 1940s | 56 | #2,762 (1944) | #3,433 |
| 1950s | 64 | #3,106 (1951) | #4,670 |
| 1960s | 87 | #3,318 (1969) | #5,047 |
| 1970s | 151 | #2,942 (1978) | #4,320 |
| 1980s | 297 | #1,985 (1981) | #3,175 |
| 1990s | 994 | #1,077 (1999) | #1,631 |
| 2000s | 5,136 | #481 (2005) | #565 |
| 2010s | 4,475 | #522 (2011) | #652 |
| 2020s | 2,600 | #650 (2020) | #671 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Laney in 2009
girls
#537
561 births · 1 in 3,275 girls
Top girls' names in 2009
More about 2009
girls
1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 3,275 of them was named Laney, which outranked 97.3% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Laney
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Biggest movers since 2008
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.