Lanie
#2,214 for girls in 2025, 83 births · Last seen for boys in 1970 at #4,724
Given to girls 99.4% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1880 · 6 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,602since 1880
Lanie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Lanie has never cracked the top 700 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,214 | 83 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,823 | 110 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,176 | 87 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,068 | 93 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,955 | 100 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,883 | 102 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,850 | 109 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,900 | 105 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,035 | 96 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,269 | 84 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,964 | 102 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,804 | 113 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,624 | 132 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,719 | 120 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,237 | 193 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,294 | 183 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,486 | 155 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,313 | 189 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,212 | 207 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,110 | 225 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,115 | 212 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,135 | 201 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,067 | 209 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,218 | 165 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,403 | 135 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,577 | 112 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,770 | 90 | — | |
| 1998 | #2,429 | 57 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,360 | 56 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,398 | 54 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,282 | 58 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,381 | 54 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,676 | 45 | — | |
| 1992 | #2,033 | 67 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,752 | 82 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,974 | 69 | — | |
| 1989 | #2,442 | 47 | — | |
| 1988 | #4,015 | 22 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,983 | 21 | — | |
| 1986 | #4,964 | 15 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,983 | 20 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,990 | 19 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,783 | 31 | — | |
| 1982 | #3,418 | 24 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,774 | 32 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,391 | 40 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,333 | 24 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,859 | 28 | — | |
| 1977 | #4,069 | 17 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,812 | 17 | — | |
| 1975 | #4,141 | 15 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,433 | 31 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,122 | 21 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,598 | 27 | — | |
| 1971 | #3,266 | 20 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,450 | 30 | #4,724 | 5 |
| 1969 | #2,003 | 39 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,874 | 20 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,484 | 14 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,148 | 16 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,733 | 12 | — | |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,635 | 13 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,438 | 14 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,239 | 10 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,357 | 14 | — | |
| 1959 | #3,254 | 14 | — | |
| 1958 | #3,747 | 11 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,309 | 13 | #3,993 | 5 |
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 | — | |
| 1955 | #3,377 | 12 | — | |
| 1954 | #3,967 | 9 | — | |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 | — | |
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | — | |
| 1951 | #3,106 | 12 | — | |
| 1950 | #4,315 | 7 | — | |
| 1949 | #3,612 | 9 | #3,690 | 5 |
| 1948 | #3,350 | 10 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,240 | 11 | #3,733 | 5 |
| 1946 | #2,597 | 14 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,598 | 12 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,946 | 10 | #3,430 | 5 |
| 1943 | #3,249 | 9 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,986 | 10 | — | |
| 1941 | #3,954 | 6 | — | |
| 1940 | #2,737 | 10 | — | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 | — | |
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | — | |
| 1935 | #3,156 | 8 | — | |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | — | |
| 1933 | #3,753 | 6 | — | |
| 1932 | #3,568 | 7 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,427 | 12 | — | |
| 1930 | #3,345 | 8 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,011 | 17 | — | |
| 1928 | #2,381 | 14 | — | |
| 1927 | #3,875 | 7 | — | |
| 1926 | #4,851 | 5 | — | |
| 1925 | #3,116 | 10 | — | |
| 1924 | #2,514 | 14 | — | |
| 1923 | #2,366 | 15 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,780 | 12 | — | |
| 1921 | #3,164 | 10 | — | |
| 1920 | #2,172 | 17 | — | |
| 1919 | #2,384 | 14 | #4,168 | 5 |
| 1918 | #2,029 | 18 | — | |
| 1917 | #2,428 | 13 | — | |
| 1916 | #2,498 | 12 | — | |
| 1915 | #2,143 | 14 | #3,825 | 5 |
| 1914 | #1,665 | 16 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,601 | 14 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,719 | 11 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,656 | 9 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,521 | 10 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,471 | 9 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,676 | 7 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,639 | 7 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,321 | 9 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,538 | 7 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,364 | 8 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,440 | 7 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,594 | 6 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,227 | 8 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,561 | 7 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,278 | 7 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,263 | 8 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,263 | 7 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,416 | 6 | — | |
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | #950 | 11 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,023 | 9 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,278 | 6 | — | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | — | |
| 1889 | #902 | 9 | — | |
| 1888 | #894 | 9 | — | |
| 1887 | #860 | 8 | — | |
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | #921 | 6 | — | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | #920 | 5 | — | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | #738 | 6 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lanie was already there! It came in at #738, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1884, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Lanie is popular in 2007
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Louisiana#223 · 1 in 962
- Alabama#362 · 1 in 1,642
- Kansas#464 · 1 in 2,010
- Oklahoma#503 · 1 in 2,225
- Missouri#660 · 1 in 3,706
Best ever in a state: #223 in Louisiana, 2007.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | #223 | 22 | 1 in 962 |
| Alabama | #362 | 13 | 1 in 1,642 |
| Kansas | #464 | 7 | 1 in 2,010 |
| Oklahoma | #503 | 8 | 1 in 2,225 |
| Missouri | #660 | 8 | 1 in 3,706 |
| Tennessee | #712 | 8 | 1 in 4,068 |
| Georgia | #735 | 14 | 1 in 3,873 |
| North Carolina | #742 | 12 | 1 in 4,009 |
| Indiana | #806 | 7 | 1 in 4,734 |
| Texas | #1,120 | 23 | 1 in 7,355 |
| Illinois | #1,147 | 9 | 1 in 7,525 |
| Virginia | #1,188 | 5 | 1 in 7,694 |
| Michigan | #1,275 | 5 | 1 in 9,141 |
| Florida | #1,681 | 7 | 1 in 12,754 |
| California | #2,025 | 12 | 1 in 19,687 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lanie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 391 spots since 2024 (#1,823 → #2,214)
- 331 spots since 2020 (#1,883 → #2,214)
- 250 spots since 2015 (#1,964 → #2,214)
- Biggest jump: 73 spots in 1894 (#1,023 → #950)
- Biggest drop: 436 spots in 1890 (#902 → #1,338)
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #738 (6 births)
- Births halved by 1881, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 7 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 1887–1889
Share of babies · girls
1 in 8,450
- Highest: 1 in 8,450 girls born in 2006 were named Lanie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 19,365 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #738 in 1880, was only 1 in 15,166 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 32.3% of all girls named Lanie (1,810) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 43 | #738 (1880) | #873 |
| 1890s | 59 | #950 (1894) | #1,226 |
| 1900s | 75 | #1,227 (1901) | #1,483 |
| 1910s | 131 | #1,521 (1910) | #1,964 |
| 1920s | 121 | #2,011 (1929) | #2,923 |
| 1930s | 59 | #2,427 (1931) | #3,470 |
| 1940s | 101 | #2,597 (1946) | #3,127 |
| 1950s | 101 | #3,106 (1951) | #3,841 |
| 1960s | 157 | #2,003 (1969) | #3,668 |
| 1970s | 230 | #2,433 (1974) | #3,208 |
| 1980s | 271 | #2,391 (1980) | #3,474 |
| 1990s | 632 | #1,752 (1991) | #2,206 |
| 2000s | 1,810 | #1,067 (2003) | #1,264 |
| 2010s | 1,237 | #1,237 (2011) | #1,770 |
| 2020s | 575 | #1,823 (2024) | #2,020 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lanie in 2007
girls
#1,212
207 births · 1 in 9,288 girls
Top girls' names in 2007
More about 2007
girls
1,922,617 girls got a published name in 2007; 1 in 9,288 of them was named Lanie, which outranked 94.1% of the 20,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).