Lashawn
Last seen for girls in 2020 at #11,090 · #6,446 for boys in 2025, 13 births
Given to girls 69.1% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1972 · 456 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 7,349since 1955
Lashawn over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #6,446 | 13 | |
| 2024 | — | #5,443 | 17 | |
| 2023 | — | #4,112 | 26 | |
| 2022 | — | #5,019 | 19 | |
| 2021 | — | #4,494 | 22 | |
| 2020 | #11,090 | 8 | #3,274 | 34 |
| 2019 | — | #4,639 | 21 | |
| 2018 | #12,464 | 7 | #3,373 | 33 |
| 2017 | #11,615 | 8 | #3,518 | 31 |
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 | #3,059 | 38 |
| 2015 | #14,482 | 6 | #3,231 | 35 |
| 2014 | #8,966 | 12 | #2,429 | 52 |
| 2013 | — | #2,562 | 47 | |
| 2012 | #13,483 | 7 | #2,415 | 52 |
| 2011 | #11,181 | 9 | #2,346 | 54 |
| 2010 | #9,790 | 11 | #2,144 | 62 |
| 2009 | #7,679 | 16 | #1,942 | 73 |
| 2008 | #5,750 | 24 | #1,802 | 82 |
| 2007 | #7,394 | 17 | #2,071 | 66 |
| 2006 | #6,356 | 20 | #2,010 | 66 |
| 2005 | #7,138 | 16 | #2,399 | 48 |
| 2004 | #6,489 | 18 | #2,344 | 48 |
| 2003 | #5,419 | 22 | #2,153 | 51 |
| 2002 | #5,673 | 20 | #2,817 | 33 |
| 2001 | #4,025 | 31 | #1,935 | 56 |
| 2000 | #3,591 | 36 | #1,944 | 53 |
| 1999 | #3,443 | 36 | #1,801 | 55 |
| 1998 | #2,461 | 56 | #1,585 | 66 |
| 1997 | #2,045 | 69 | #1,859 | 50 |
| 1996 | #1,898 | 76 | #1,480 | 68 |
| 1995 | #1,802 | 79 | #1,467 | 66 |
| 1994 | #1,444 | 110 | #1,608 | 57 |
| 1993 | #1,426 | 113 | #1,577 | 57 |
| 1992 | #1,474 | 107 | #1,359 | 69 |
| 1991 | #1,322 | 125 | #1,336 | 71 |
| 1990 | #1,272 | 128 | #1,635 | 50 |
| 1989 | #1,220 | 132 | #1,374 | 64 |
| 1988 | #1,300 | 111 | #1,553 | 47 |
| 1987 | #1,093 | 139 | #1,587 | 44 |
| 1986 | #1,177 | 120 | #1,493 | 45 |
| 1985 | #1,109 | 130 | #1,190 | 62 |
| 1984 | #1,035 | 137 | #1,365 | 48 |
| 1983 | #1,137 | 117 | #1,166 | 60 |
| 1982 | #950 | 156 | #1,150 | 63 |
| 1981 | #976 | 150 | #1,084 | 70 |
| 1980 | #977 | 152 | #982 | 84 |
| 1979 | #846 | 184 | #937 | 88 |
| 1978 | #684 | 233 | #956 | 82 |
| 1977 | #661 | 241 | #830 | 105 |
| 1976 | #586 | 278 | #832 | 101 |
| 1975 | #527 | 332 | #827 | 101 |
| 1974 | #469 | 386 | #825 | 95 |
| 1973 | #446 | 420 | #898 | 79 |
| 1972 | #422 | 456 | #889 | 81 |
| 1971 | #432 | 481 | #998 | 66 |
| 1970 | #444 | 494 | #1,435 | 34 |
| 1969 | #499 | 380 | #1,728 | 23 |
| 1968 | #572 | 280 | #1,233 | 38 |
| 1967 | #685 | 200 | #1,411 | 29 |
| 1966 | #849 | 138 | #1,814 | 18 |
| 1965 | #1,009 | 107 | #3,537 | 6 |
| 1964 | #1,319 | 72 | #4,039 | 5 |
| 1963 | #1,839 | 40 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,031 | 33 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,957 | 18 | — | |
| 1960 | #4,184 | 10 | — | |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | — | |
| 1958 | #4,890 | 7 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 | — | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | #4,740 | 7 | — | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Lashawn! It came in at #4,740, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1956, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Lashawn is popular in 1982
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- District of Columbia#109 · 1 in 410
- Maryland#293 · 1 in 1,857
- Indiana#534 · 1 in 5,026
- Florida#540 · 1 in 4,050
- Michigan#678 · 1 in 7,201
Best ever in a state: #26 in District of Columbia, 1973.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #109 | 14 | 1 in 410 |
| Maryland | #293 | 12 | 1 in 1,857 |
| Indiana | #534 | 7 | 1 in 5,026 |
| Florida | #540 | 14 | 1 in 4,050 |
| Michigan | #678 | 8 | 1 in 7,201 |
| New York | #682 | 18 | 1 in 5,708 |
| Georgia | #772 | 5 | 1 in 6,975 |
| Pennsylvania | #835 | 7 | 1 in 9,986 |
| Ohio | #914 | 6 | 1 in 11,912 |
| Illinois | #1,238 | 5 | 1 in 14,885 |
| California | #1,427 | 11 | 1 in 16,885 |
| Texas | #1,623 | 6 | 1 in 21,654 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lashawn
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2020
- Biggest jump: 164 spots in 1967 (#849 → #685)
- Biggest drop: 187 spots in 1983 (#950 → #1,137)
- Debuted 1955
- Peaked 1972 at #422 (456 births)
- Births halved by 1979, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 17 yrs · run 1966–1982
- Highest: 1 in 3,336 girls born in 1972 were named Lashawn (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 202,069 girls born in 2020 (0.00%)
- 47.7% of all girls named Lashawn (3,505) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 1997, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 29 | #4,625 (1959) | #4,793 |
| 1960s | 1,278 | #499 (1969) | #1,594 |
| 1970s | 3,505 | #422 (1972) | #552 |
| 1980s | 1,344 | #950 (1982) | #1,097 |
| 1990s | 899 | #1,272 (1990) | #1,859 |
| 2000s | 220 | #3,591 (2000) | #5,951 |
| 2010s | 66 | #8,966 (2014) | #12,039 |
| 2020s | 8 | #11,090 (2020) | #11,090 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lashawn in 1982
Top girls' names in 1982
Top boys' names in 1982
More about 1982
girls
1,693,325 girls got a published name in 1982; 1 in 10,855 of them was named Lashawn, which outranked 92.3% of the 12,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #947Lisette157
- #947Rae157
- #947Tenika157
- #950Lashawn156
- #950Danica156
- #950Fawn156
- #950Latesha156
- #958Consuelo155
- #958Emilia155
- #958Roseanna155
Tied with 7 names at #950; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,814,447 boys got a published name in 1982; 1 in 28,801 of them was named Lashawn, which outranked 84.4% of the 7,367 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,140Thurman64
- #1,140Trinity64
- #1,140Wiley64
- #1,150Lashawn63
- #1,150Adonis63
- #1,150Antonia63
- #1,150Armand63
- #1,164Antron62
- #1,164Brook62
- #1,164Fermin62
Tied with 13 names at #1,150; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.