Lashay
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #13,477 · Last seen for boys in 1993 at #8,700
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1992 · 140 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,837since 1966
Lashay over time
Rank among girls' names. Lashay has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | — | |
| 2023 | #8,989 | 11 | — | |
| 2022 | #9,680 | 10 | — | |
| 2021 | #12,206 | 7 | — | |
| 2020 | #7,969 | 13 | — | |
| 2019 | #10,473 | 9 | — | |
| 2018 | #8,146 | 13 | — | |
| 2017 | #6,808 | 17 | — | |
| 2016 | #6,401 | 19 | — | |
| 2015 | #6,236 | 20 | — | |
| 2014 | #5,625 | 23 | — | |
| 2013 | #3,918 | 38 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,121 | 36 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,659 | 42 | — | |
| 2010 | #3,306 | 49 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,619 | 44 | — | |
| 2008 | #3,267 | 51 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,616 | 70 | — | |
| 2006 | #2,978 | 57 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,704 | 62 | — | |
| 2004 | #3,033 | 51 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,638 | 60 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,976 | 49 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,487 | 62 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,545 | 59 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,073 | 74 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,899 | 80 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,595 | 100 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,840 | 79 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,598 | 94 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,511 | 103 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,299 | 130 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #1,243 | 140 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,306 | 127 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,479 | 105 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,288 | 122 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,671 | 77 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,531 | 83 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,484 | 84 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,082 | 51 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,812 | 59 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,156 | 45 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,822 | 59 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,305 | 43 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,440 | 39 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,795 | 31 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,572 | 33 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,838 | 28 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,792 | 27 | #5,587 | 5 |
| 1975 | #3,950 | 16 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,212 | 21 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,830 | 24 | — | |
| 1972 | #3,177 | 20 | — | |
| 1971 | #3,508 | 18 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,208 | 20 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 | — | |
| 1968 | #5,642 | 7 | — | |
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | — | |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Lashay! It came in at #6,564, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2025, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Lashay is popular in 1992
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maryland#485 · 1 in 3,359
- New Jersey#582 · 1 in 4,554
- Missouri#640 · 1 in 5,153
- Georgia#750 · 1 in 5,899
- Pennsylvania#783 · 1 in 7,607
Best ever in a state: #378 in Maryland, 1997.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | #485 | 8 | 1 in 3,359 |
| New Jersey | #582 | 10 | 1 in 4,554 |
| Missouri | #640 | 6 | 1 in 5,153 |
| Georgia | #750 | 7 | 1 in 5,899 |
| Pennsylvania | #783 | 9 | 1 in 7,607 |
| Ohio | #913 | 7 | 1 in 9,706 |
| Illinois | #948 | 9 | 1 in 8,364 |
| Michigan | #1,118 | 5 | 1 in 11,413 |
| Florida | #1,134 | 7 | 1 in 10,725 |
| New York | #1,293 | 9 | 1 in 12,901 |
| California | #1,694 | 13 | 1 in 19,754 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lashay
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2024
- Debuted 1966
- Peaked 1992 at #1,243 (140 births)
- Births halved by 2000, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 13,171 girls born in 1992 were named Lashay (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 270,032 girls born in 2024 (0.00%)
- 36.4% of all girls named Lashay (1,032) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27 | #4,723 (1969) | #5,933 |
| 1970s | 238 | #2,572 (1978) | #3,088 |
| 1980s | 662 | #1,288 (1989) | #1,859 |
| 1990s | 1,032 | #1,243 (1992) | #1,584 |
| 2000s | 565 | #2,487 (2001) | #2,886 |
| 2010s | 266 | #3,306 (2010) | #5,869 |
| 2020s | 47 | #7,969 (2020) | #10,464 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lashay in 1992
Top girls' names in 1992
More about 1992
girls
1,843,931 girls got a published name in 1992; 1 in 13,171 of them was named Lashay, which outranked 92.0% of the 15,610 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,231Markita141
- #1,231Miracle141
- #1,231Tiarra141
- #1,243Lashay140
- #1,243Reagan140
- #1,243Shakia140
- #1,243Xiomara140
- #1,248Ceara139
- #1,248Jalissa139
- #1,248Marlen139
Tied with 4 names at #1,243; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.