Latasha
- Last seen for girls in 2022 at #15,306
- Last seen for boys in 1989 at #4,271
- Given to girls 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1981 · 2,060 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 30,211since 1959
Latasha over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Latasha has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | #15,306 | 5 | — | |
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | #12,142 | 7 | — | |
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | — | |
| 2017 | #14,124 | 6 | — | |
| 2016 | #8,875 | 12 | — | |
| 2015 | #9,481 | 11 | — | |
| 2014 | #9,517 | 11 | — | |
| 2013 | #11,000 | 9 | — | |
| 2012 | #10,429 | 10 | — | |
| 2011 | #9,723 | 11 | — | |
| 2010 | #5,247 | 26 | — | |
| 2009 | #6,317 | 21 | — | |
| 2008 | #5,574 | 25 | — | |
| 2007 | #3,786 | 42 | — | |
| 2006 | #3,469 | 46 | — | |
| 2005 | #4,267 | 32 | — | |
| 2004 | #3,180 | 48 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,800 | 55 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,709 | 56 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,304 | 69 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,174 | 73 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,719 | 94 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,472 | 116 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,298 | 134 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,056 | 175 | — | |
| 1995 | #808 | 245 | — | |
| 1994 | #708 | 294 | — | |
| 1993 | #598 | 390 | — | |
| 1992 | #462 | 533 | — | |
| 1991 | #436 | 583 | — | |
| 1990 | #358 | 741 | — | |
| 1989 | #282 | 954 | #4,271 | 12 |
| 1988 | #243 | 1,086 | #4,786 | 9 |
| 1987 | #223 | 1,202 | #6,089 | 6 |
| 1986 | #220 | 1,203 | — | |
| 1985 | #200 | 1,323 | — | |
| 1984 | #175 | 1,560 | #4,973 | 7 |
| 1983 | #166 | 1,665 | #3,630 | 11 |
| 1982 | #153 | 1,923 | #3,482 | 12 |
| 1981 | #139 | 2,060 | #4,961 | 7 |
| 1980 | #141 | 2,059 | #3,838 | 10 |
| 1979 | #166 | 1,688 | #3,569 | 11 |
| 1978 | #185 | 1,395 | #3,857 | 9 |
| 1977 | #170 | 1,597 | — | |
| 1976 | #185 | 1,384 | — | |
| 1975 | #197 | 1,243 | #3,941 | 8 |
| 1974 | #212 | 1,196 | #2,946 | 12 |
| 1973 | #256 | 982 | — | |
| 1972 | #327 | 715 | — | |
| 1971 | #444 | 469 | — | |
| 1970 | #722 | 208 | — | |
| 1969 | #852 | 149 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,519 | 56 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,598 | 50 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,736 | 42 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,110 | 31 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,752 | 21 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,424 | 25 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,263 | 10 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,460 | 14 | — | |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | — | |
| 1959 | #4,300 | 9 | — | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1959
The first year at least five girls were named Latasha! It came in at #4,300, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2018–2019, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Latasha is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Latasha in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Latasha
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2022
- Biggest jump: 667 spots in 1969
- Biggest drop: 248 spots in 1996
Rise & fade · girls
22 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1959
- Peaked 1981 at #139 (2,060 births)
- Births halved by 1989, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 27 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 27 yrs · run 1969–1995
Share of babies · girls
1 in 806
- Highest: 1 in 806 girls born in 1980 were named Latasha (0.12%)
- Latest: 1 in 328,026 girls born in 2022 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #139 in 1981, was only 1 in 810 (0.12%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1980s
- 49.8% of all girls named Latasha (15,035) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 9 | #4,300 (1959) | #4,300 |
| 1960s | 405 | #852 (1969) | #2,588 |
| 1970s | 10,877 | #166 (1979) | #286 |
| 1980s | 15,035 | #139 (1981) | #194 |
| 1990s | 3,305 | #358 (1990) | #892 |
| 2000s | 467 | #2,174 (2000) | #3,658 |
| 2010s | 101 | #5,247 (2010) | #10,453 |
| 2020s | 12 | #12,142 (2020) | #13,724 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Latasha ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: