Latisha
Last seen for girls in 2023 at #12,197 · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #4,811
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1979 · 1,175 births
- Debut · girls
- 10 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 18,406since 1948
Latisha over time
Rank among girls' names. Latisha has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | #12,197 | 7 | — | |
| 2022 | #10,383 | 9 | — | |
| 2021 | #12,206 | 7 | — | |
| 2020 | #13,453 | 6 | — | |
| 2019 | #11,356 | 8 | — | |
| 2018 | #9,151 | 11 | — | |
| 2017 | #10,689 | 9 | — | |
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 | — | |
| 2015 | #8,447 | 13 | — | |
| 2014 | #10,955 | 9 | — | |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | — | |
| 2012 | #8,632 | 13 | — | |
| 2011 | #6,148 | 21 | — | |
| 2010 | #11,246 | 9 | — | |
| 2009 | #6,811 | 19 | — | |
| 2008 | #5,279 | 27 | — | |
| 2007 | #5,377 | 26 | — | |
| 2006 | #4,463 | 32 | — | |
| 2005 | #3,646 | 40 | — | |
| 2004 | #3,265 | 46 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,923 | 52 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,935 | 50 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,700 | 55 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,545 | 59 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,738 | 92 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,508 | 112 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,175 | 156 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,064 | 174 | — | |
| 1995 | #832 | 235 | — | |
| 1994 | #648 | 332 | — | |
| 1993 | #523 | 465 | — | |
| 1992 | #504 | 479 | — | |
| 1991 | #495 | 480 | — | |
| 1990 | #493 | 495 | — | |
| 1989 | #413 | 600 | #4,811 | 10 |
| 1988 | #400 | 601 | — | |
| 1987 | #384 | 609 | #6,089 | 6 |
| 1986 | #362 | 655 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #316 | 756 | — | |
| 1984 | #309 | 766 | — | |
| 1983 | #308 | 745 | — | |
| 1982 | #285 | 854 | — | |
| 1981 | #255 | 964 | — | |
| 1980 | #245 | 1,057 | — | |
| 1979 | #221 | 1,175 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #249 | 956 | #5,059 | 6 |
| 1977 | #268 | 936 | #5,123 | 6 |
| 1976 | #306 | 748 | — | |
| 1975 | #329 | 671 | — | |
| 1974 | #337 | 656 | — | |
| 1973 | #396 | 512 | — | |
| 1972 | #456 | 408 | — | |
| 1971 | #498 | 382 | — | |
| 1970 | #740 | 199 | — | |
| 1969 | #881 | 142 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,099 | 94 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,581 | 51 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,532 | 53 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,801 | 40 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,747 | 44 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,543 | 23 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,592 | 13 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,359 | 26 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,357 | 14 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,760 | 18 | — | |
| 1958 | #3,747 | 11 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,309 | 13 | — | |
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 | — | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 | — | |
| 1953 | #5,040 | 6 | — | |
| 1952 | #4,483 | 7 | — | |
| 1951 | #5,414 | 5 | — | |
| 1950 | #5,301 | 5 | — | |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | — | |
| 1948 | #3,350 | 10 | — | |
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Latisha! It came in at #3,350, and was given to 10 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1955, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Latisha is popular in 1985
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- North Carolina#155 · 1 in 867
- Virginia#158 · 1 in 969
- Alabama#169 · 1 in 908
- Oklahoma#174 · 1 in 958
- South Carolina#175 · 1 in 892
Best ever in a state: #69 in District of Columbia, 1978.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | #155 | 41 | 1 in 867 |
| Virginia | #158 | 34 | 1 in 969 |
| Alabama | #169 | 24 | 1 in 908 |
| Oklahoma | #174 | 21 | 1 in 958 |
| South Carolina | #175 | 20 | 1 in 892 |
| District of Columbia | #176 | 8 | 1 in 711 |
| Mississippi | #177 | 17 | 1 in 867 |
| Tennessee | #181 | 27 | 1 in 1,029 |
| Maryland | #182 | 23 | 1 in 1,048 |
| Arkansas | #190 | 12 | 1 in 1,058 |
| Georgia | #195 | 33 | 1 in 1,124 |
| Missouri | #228 | 22 | 1 in 1,463 |
| Louisiana | #231 | 22 | 1 in 1,367 |
| New Mexico | #238 | 9 | 1 in 1,067 |
| Kentucky | #241 | 14 | 1 in 1,518 |
| New Jersey | #254 | 24 | 1 in 1,684 |
| Kansas | #264 | 9 | 1 in 1,628 |
| Colorado | #273 | 14 | 1 in 1,569 |
| Illinois | #280 | 41 | 1 in 1,780 |
| Florida | #305 | 33 | 1 in 1,977 |
| Ohio | #312 | 30 | 1 in 2,303 |
| New York | #313 | 54 | 1 in 1,979 |
| Indiana | #331 | 14 | 1 in 2,432 |
| Washington | #345 | 13 | 1 in 2,126 |
| Michigan | #356 | 21 | 1 in 2,727 |
| Arizona | #382 | 10 | 1 in 2,300 |
| Wisconsin | #387 | 9 | 1 in 3,405 |
| Pennsylvania | #408 | 20 | 1 in 3,457 |
| Connecticut | #419 | 5 | 1 in 3,407 |
| Texas | #430 | 48 | 1 in 2,778 |
| Minnesota | #544 | 5 | 1 in 5,708 |
| California | #573 | 49 | 1 in 4,128 |
| Massachusetts | #639 | 5 | 1 in 6,998 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Latisha
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2023
- Biggest jump: 242 spots in 1971 (#740 → #498)
- Biggest drop: 232 spots in 1996 (#832 → #1,064)
- Debuted 1948
- Peaked 1979 at #221 (1,175 births)
- Births halved by 1990, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 27 yrs · run 1969–1995
- Highest: 1 in 1,366 girls born in 1979 were named Latisha (0.07%)
- Latest: 1 in 229,226 girls born in 2023 (0.00%)
- 41.3% of all girls named Latisha (7,607) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 15 | #3,350 (1948) | #4,297 |
| 1950s | 80 | #2,760 (1959) | #4,353 |
| 1960s | 500 | #881 (1969) | #2,049 |
| 1970s | 6,643 | #221 (1979) | #380 |
| 1980s | 7,607 | #245 (1980) | #328 |
| 1990s | 3,020 | #493 (1990) | #898 |
| 2000s | 406 | #2,545 (2000) | #3,994 |
| 2010s | 106 | #6,148 (2011) | #10,411 |
| 2020s | 29 | #10,383 (2022) | #12,060 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Latisha in 1985
Top girls' names in 1985
More about 1985
girls
1,720,828 girls got a published name in 1985; 1 in 2,276 of them was named Latisha, which outranked 97.5% of the 12,505 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 18.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.