Leandra
#3,577 for girls in 2025, 42 births · Last seen for boys in 1991 at #5,521
Given to girls 99.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1989 · 269 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 7,029since 1913
Leandra over time
Rank among girls' names. Leandra has never cracked the top 700 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,577 | 42 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,892 | 38 | — | |
| 2023 | #4,191 | 34 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,536 | 44 | — | |
| 2021 | #4,719 | 28 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,450 | 44 | — | |
| 2019 | #3,718 | 40 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,438 | 45 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,835 | 59 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,866 | 59 | — | |
| 2015 | #3,254 | 50 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,517 | 71 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,936 | 57 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,232 | 84 | — | |
| 2011 | #2,274 | 82 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,992 | 100 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,244 | 87 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,354 | 82 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,940 | 106 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,939 | 103 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,819 | 107 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,714 | 113 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,561 | 123 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,624 | 114 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,489 | 126 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,329 | 142 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,255 | 148 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,133 | 167 | — | |
| 1997 | #997 | 195 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,064 | 174 | — | |
| 1995 | #946 | 199 | — | |
| 1994 | #880 | 222 | — | |
| 1993 | #835 | 236 | — | |
| 1992 | #865 | 228 | — | |
| 1991 | #850 | 235 | #5,521 | 9 |
| 1990 | #802 | 250 | — | |
| 1989 | #734 | 269 | #6,941 | 6 |
| 1988 | #824 | 221 | — | |
| 1987 | #900 | 185 | — | |
| 1986 | #958 | 164 | #5,926 | 6 |
| 1985 | #1,149 | 124 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | #1,279 | 98 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,084 | 127 | #4,907 | 7 |
| 1982 | #1,262 | 102 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | #1,304 | 97 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,419 | 86 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,454 | 83 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,461 | 78 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,451 | 76 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,433 | 73 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,447 | 71 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,176 | 95 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,570 | 59 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,804 | 47 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,415 | 74 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,043 | 40 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,499 | 62 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,267 | 75 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,382 | 63 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,147 | 30 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,538 | 23 | — | |
| 1964 | #3,244 | 16 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,704 | 21 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,605 | 22 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,474 | 24 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,307 | 26 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,678 | 19 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,376 | 23 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,486 | 21 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,929 | 16 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,725 | 17 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,592 | 18 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,812 | 15 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,327 | 20 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,391 | 18 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,185 | 20 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,212 | 20 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,070 | 22 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,637 | 15 | — | |
| 1946 | #3,034 | 11 | — | |
| 1945 | #3,676 | 7 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,096 | 17 | — | |
| 1943 | #2,695 | 12 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,666 | 12 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,397 | 13 | — | |
| 1940 | #3,503 | 7 | — | |
| 1939 | #4,250 | 5 | — | |
| 1938 | #2,340 | 13 | — | |
| 1937 | #3,146 | 8 | — | |
| 1936 | #3,103 | 8 | — | |
| 1935 | #2,926 | 9 | — | |
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | #3,901 | 6 | — | |
| 1931 | #3,497 | 7 | — | |
| 1930 | #3,055 | 9 | — | |
| 1929 | #4,053 | 6 | — | |
| 1928 | #4,195 | 6 | — | |
| 1927 | #4,286 | 6 | — | |
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | — | |
| 1924 | #4,434 | 6 | — | |
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | #4,445 | 6 | — | |
| 1921 | #3,400 | 9 | — | |
| 1920 | #4,398 | 6 | — | |
| 1919 | #3,452 | 8 | — | |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | — | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | #3,134 | 8 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | #3,187 | 5 | — | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Leandra! It came in at #3,187, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1913–1914, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Leandra is popular in 1995
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#232 · 1 in 950
- Colorado#404 · 1 in 2,252
- Kentucky#499 · 1 in 3,927
- Minnesota#544 · 1 in 4,162
- New Jersey#687 · 1 in 5,351
Best ever in a state: #128 in New Mexico, 1992.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #232 | 9 | 1 in 950 |
| Colorado | #404 | 9 | 1 in 2,252 |
| Kentucky | #499 | 5 | 1 in 3,927 |
| Minnesota | #544 | 6 | 1 in 4,162 |
| New Jersey | #687 | 8 | 1 in 5,351 |
| Florida | #721 | 13 | 1 in 5,606 |
| New York | #755 | 19 | 1 in 5,659 |
| North Carolina | #770 | 6 | 1 in 6,377 |
| Virginia | #786 | 5 | 1 in 6,819 |
| Washington | #799 | 5 | 1 in 5,721 |
| Texas | #879 | 20 | 1 in 6,823 |
| Pennsylvania | #891 | 7 | 1 in 8,908 |
| California | #1,141 | 23 | 1 in 10,199 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Leandra
- 315 spots since 2024 (#3,892 → #3,577)
- 127 spots since 2020 (#3,450 → #3,577)
- 323 spots since 2015 (#3,254 → #3,577)
- Biggest jump: 191 spots in 1986 (#1,149 → #958)
- Biggest drop: 136 spots in 1998 (#997 → #1,133)
- Debuted 1913
- Peaked 1989 at #734 (269 births)
- Births halved by 2001, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 11 yrs · run 1986–1995
- Highest: 1 in 6,853 girls born in 1989 were named Leandra (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 38,268 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 29.2% of all girls named Leandra (2,054) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 26 | #3,134 (1915) | #3,646 |
| 1920s | 50 | #3,400 (1921) | #4,273 |
| 1930s | 65 | #2,340 (1938) | #3,277 |
| 1940s | 136 | #2,070 (1948) | #2,699 |
| 1950s | 187 | #2,185 (1950) | #2,550 |
| 1960s | 362 | #1,267 (1968) | #2,217 |
| 1970s | 696 | #1,176 (1974) | #1,525 |
| 1980s | 1,473 | #734 (1989) | #1,091 |
| 1990s | 2,054 | #802 (1990) | #963 |
| 2000s | 1,103 | #1,329 (2000) | #1,801 |
| 2010s | 647 | #1,992 (2010) | #2,806 |
| 2020s | 230 | #3,450 (2020) | #3,894 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Leandra in 1995
Top girls' names in 1995
More about 1995
girls
1,758,548 girls got a published name in 1995; 1 in 8,837 of them was named Leandra, which outranked 94.0% of the 15,753 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).