Leanne
#2,485 for girls in 2025, 71 births · Last seen for boys in 1980 at #6,250
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1966 · 765 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 29,627since 1929
Leanne over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Leanne has never cracked the top 300 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,485 | 71 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,694 | 64 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,494 | 71 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,319 | 80 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,510 | 70 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,078 | 88 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,875 | 107 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,179 | 86 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,770 | 118 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,660 | 129 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,793 | 116 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,838 | 110 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,888 | 106 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,575 | 138 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,612 | 134 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,593 | 136 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,710 | 129 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,756 | 126 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,613 | 138 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,530 | 143 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,417 | 151 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,329 | 160 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,140 | 190 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,247 | 159 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,045 | 205 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,014 | 208 | — | |
| 1999 | #879 | 244 | — | |
| 1998 | #779 | 276 | — | |
| 1997 | #728 | 292 | — | |
| 1996 | #796 | 259 | — | |
| 1995 | #679 | 313 | — | |
| 1994 | #655 | 327 | — | |
| 1993 | #566 | 420 | — | |
| 1992 | #569 | 409 | — | |
| 1991 | #521 | 446 | — | |
| 1990 | #531 | 447 | — | |
| 1989 | #457 | 529 | — | |
| 1988 | #436 | 521 | — | |
| 1987 | #452 | 489 | — | |
| 1986 | #399 | 567 | — | |
| 1985 | #391 | 572 | — | |
| 1984 | #379 | 597 | — | |
| 1983 | #373 | 600 | — | |
| 1982 | #404 | 575 | — | |
| 1981 | #370 | 632 | — | |
| 1980 | #346 | 683 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #358 | 630 | — | |
| 1978 | #467 | 422 | — | |
| 1977 | #493 | 386 | — | |
| 1976 | #468 | 405 | — | |
| 1975 | #426 | 468 | — | |
| 1974 | #448 | 412 | — | |
| 1973 | #385 | 533 | — | |
| 1972 | #396 | 518 | — | |
| 1971 | #379 | 607 | — | |
| 1970 | #361 | 682 | — | |
| 1969 | #321 | 801 | — | |
| 1968 | #326 | 715 | — | |
| 1967 | #330 | 702 | — | |
| 1966 | #320 | 765 | — | |
| 1965 | #331 | 739 | — | |
| 1964 | #355 | 702 | — | |
| 1963 | #365 | 684 | — | |
| 1962 | #359 | 693 | — | |
| 1961 | #374 | 664 | — | |
| 1960 | #387 | 601 | — | |
| 1959 | #388 | 597 | — | |
| 1958 | #437 | 470 | — | |
| 1957 | #449 | 440 | — | |
| 1956 | #437 | 443 | — | |
| 1955 | #468 | 376 | — | |
| 1954 | #492 | 324 | — | |
| 1953 | #502 | 299 | — | |
| 1952 | #570 | 229 | — | |
| 1951 | #583 | 216 | — | |
| 1950 | #602 | 193 | — | |
| 1949 | #616 | 180 | — | |
| 1948 | #645 | 166 | — | |
| 1947 | #708 | 143 | — | |
| 1946 | #732 | 122 | — | |
| 1945 | #728 | 105 | — | |
| 1944 | #768 | 99 | — | |
| 1943 | #816 | 90 | — | |
| 1942 | #752 | 101 | — | |
| 1941 | #838 | 75 | — | |
| 1940 | #795 | 79 | — | |
| 1939 | #898 | 61 | — | |
| 1938 | #955 | 55 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,070 | 44 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,245 | 33 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,381 | 28 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,292 | 31 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,658 | 21 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,877 | 18 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,307 | 13 | — | |
| 1930 | #3,055 | 9 | — | |
| 1929 | #3,682 | 7 | — | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1929
The first year at least five girls were named Leanne! It came in at #3,682, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1929–1930, when fewer than 10 girls a year got the name.
Where Leanne is popular in 1964
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- North Dakota#165 · 1 in 623
- Oregon#168 · 1 in 686
- Washington#174 · 1 in 750
- Iowa#175 · 1 in 862
- Montana#188 · 1 in 768
Best ever in a state: #113 in Delaware, 1980.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota | #165 | 9 | 1 in 623 |
| Oregon | #168 | 20 | 1 in 686 |
| Washington | #174 | 32 | 1 in 750 |
| Iowa | #175 | 28 | 1 in 862 |
| Montana | #188 | 7 | 1 in 768 |
| Wisconsin | #214 | 28 | 1 in 1,414 |
| Nebraska | #221 | 11 | 1 in 1,184 |
| Massachusetts | #240 | 28 | 1 in 1,793 |
| Hawaii | #246 | 6 | 1 in 965 |
| South Dakota | #247 | 5 | 1 in 1,251 |
| Minnesota | #250 | 19 | 1 in 1,785 |
| Colorado | #258 | 13 | 1 in 1,364 |
| Illinois | #278 | 53 | 1 in 1,852 |
| Tennessee | #299 | 16 | 1 in 2,177 |
| Michigan | #303 | 35 | 1 in 2,233 |
| Utah | #310 | 6 | 1 in 1,568 |
| Arkansas | #313 | 9 | 1 in 1,934 |
| Ohio | #317 | 36 | 1 in 2,611 |
| Indiana | #329 | 19 | 1 in 2,466 |
| Kansas | #338 | 8 | 1 in 2,147 |
| California | #351 | 80 | 1 in 2,148 |
| Pennsylvania | #359 | 33 | 1 in 3,031 |
| North Carolina | #370 | 16 | 1 in 2,882 |
| Missouri | #395 | 11 | 1 in 3,593 |
| Florida | #410 | 16 | 1 in 3,001 |
| Georgia | #431 | 12 | 1 in 3,656 |
| Texas | #455 | 34 | 1 in 3,067 |
| Maryland | #457 | 7 | 1 in 4,295 |
| Virginia | #459 | 9 | 1 in 4,427 |
| Oklahoma | #464 | 5 | 1 in 3,782 |
| Mississippi | #477 | 6 | 1 in 3,784 |
| Alabama | #481 | 8 | 1 in 4,020 |
| Kentucky | #538 | 5 | 1 in 5,960 |
| New Jersey | #553 | 9 | 1 in 6,324 |
| New York | #605 | 23 | 1 in 6,987 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Leanne
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 209 spots since 2024 (#2,694 → #2,485)
- 407 spots since 2020 (#2,078 → #2,485)
- 692 spots since 2015 (#1,793 → #2,485)
- Biggest jump: 115 spots in 1938 (#1,070 → #955)
- Biggest drop: 135 spots in 2000 (#879 → #1,014)
Rise & fade · girls
37 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1929
- Peaked 1966 at #320 (765 births)
- Births halved by 1994, 28 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 62 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 62 yrs · run 1938–1999
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,106
- Highest: 1 in 2,106 girls born in 1969 were named Leanne (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 22,638 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #320 in 1966, was only 1 in 2,212 (0.05%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1960s
- 23.8% of all girls named Leanne (7,066) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 7 | #3,682 (1929) | #3,682 |
| 1930s | 313 | #898 (1939) | #1,574 |
| 1940s | 1,160 | #616 (1949) | #740 |
| 1950s | 3,587 | #388 (1959) | #493 |
| 1960s | 7,066 | #320 (1966) | #347 |
| 1970s | 5,063 | #358 (1979) | #418 |
| 1980s | 5,765 | #346 (1980) | #401 |
| 1990s | 3,433 | #521 (1991) | #670 |
| 2000s | 1,609 | #1,014 (2000) | #1,380 |
| 2010s | 1,180 | #1,575 (2012) | #1,778 |
| 2020s | 444 | #2,078 (2020) | #2,430 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Leanne in 1964
girls
#355
702 births · 1 in 2,699 girls
Top girls' names in 1964
More about 1964
girls
1,894,855 girls got a published name in 1964; 1 in 2,699 of them was named Leanne, which outranked 95.5% of the 7,806 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).