Leotha
- Last seen for girls in 1964 at #6,767
- Last seen for boys in 1982 at #5,619
- Given to girls 75.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1900 · 6 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 367since 1900
Leotha over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | #5,619 | 6 | |
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | — | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | #3,988 | 5 | |
| 1958 | — | #3,944 | 5 | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | #3,216 | 7 | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | — | |
| 1951 | — | #3,714 | 5 | |
| 1950 | #3,235 | 11 | #3,021 | 7 |
| 1949 | #4,673 | 6 | #2,606 | 9 |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,240 | 11 | #3,370 | 6 |
| 1946 | — | #3,173 | 6 | |
| 1945 | #4,556 | 5 | #2,574 | 8 |
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | #3,801 | 7 | #3,231 | 6 |
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | #2,668 | 11 | #3,505 | 5 |
| 1940 | #3,503 | 7 | — | |
| 1939 | — | #3,113 | 6 | |
| 1938 | #2,940 | 9 | #3,534 | 5 |
| 1937 | #2,735 | 10 | — | |
| 1936 | #2,857 | 9 | — | |
| 1935 | #3,431 | 7 | — | |
| 1934 | #2,289 | 13 | #2,563 | 9 |
| 1933 | #3,753 | 6 | — | |
| 1932 | #3,568 | 7 | #3,361 | 6 |
| 1931 | #3,497 | 7 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,845 | 10 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,737 | 11 | — | |
| 1928 | #3,164 | 9 | #3,357 | 7 |
| 1927 | #3,284 | 9 | — | |
| 1926 | #3,564 | 8 | #4,201 | 5 |
| 1925 | #2,378 | 15 | — | |
| 1924 | #2,308 | 16 | — | |
| 1923 | #2,264 | 16 | — | |
| 1922 | #5,009 | 5 | — | |
| 1921 | #3,400 | 9 | — | |
| 1920 | #2,463 | 14 | #3,815 | 6 |
| 1919 | #2,156 | 16 | — | |
| 1918 | #2,289 | 15 | — | |
| 1917 | #2,552 | 12 | — | |
| 1916 | #3,919 | 6 | — | |
| 1915 | #2,384 | 12 | — | |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 | — | |
| 1913 | #2,827 | 6 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,634 | 6 | — | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | #1,763 | 7 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,862 | 6 | — | |
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | #1,951 | 5 | — | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 | — | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1900
The first year at least five girls were named Leotha! It came in at #1,723, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1907, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Leotha is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Leotha in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Leotha
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1964
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1900
- Peaked 1900 at #1,723 (6 births)
- Births halved by 1901, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 49,604
- Highest: 1 in 49,604 girls born in 1909 were named Leotha (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 378,971 girls born in 1964 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,723 in 1900, was only 1 in 49,964 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 30.5% of all girls named Leotha (112) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1982
- Mostly girls until 1981, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 24 | #1,723 (1900) | #1,825 |
| 1910s | 79 | #2,156 (1919) | #2,744 |
| 1920s | 112 | #2,264 (1923) | #3,057 |
| 1930s | 78 | #2,289 (1934) | #3,102 |
| 1940s | 52 | #2,668 (1941) | #3,955 |
| 1950s | 17 | #3,235 (1950) | #4,072 |
| 1960s | 5 | #6,767 (1964) | #6,767 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Leotha ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: