Les

Last seen for girls in 1961 at #5,851 · #7,194 for boys in 2025, 11 births
Given to boys 99.1% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1961 · 182 births
Debut · boys
5 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
3,448
since 1900

Les over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Les has never cracked the top 500 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201959peak #586, 1961boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025—#7,19411
2024—#12,3495
2023—#10,8216
2022—#8,9908
2021—#12,1465
2020—#7,50210
2019—#6,77712
2018—#8,8198
2017—#6,68512
2016—#6,05314
2015—#7,49110
2014—#8,7818
2013—#9,6557
2012—#12,2745
2011—#7,00911
2010—#8,8038
2009—#7,69210
2008—#8,3249
2007—#9,7887
2006—#9,5857
2005—#11,4725
2004—#8,9277
2003—#8,6437
2002——
2001—#10,5565
2000—#5,29713
1999—#8,7046
1998—#6,3149
1997——
1996—#9,0155
1995—#5,12411
1994—#7,7706
1993—#7,6386
1992—#5,23610
1991—#5,09610
1990—#4,40712
1989—#3,32517
1988—#2,25527
1987—#4,9688
1986—#3,26814
1985—#2,35722
1984—#2,95615
1983—#2,49319
1982—#2,51819
1981—#2,33821
1980—#2,36721
1979—#2,56818
1978—#2,27920
1977—#1,67032
1976—#1,71130
1975—#1,88425
1974—#1,79026
1973—#1,61229
1972—#1,77125
1971—#1,18148
1970—#1,11754
1969—#1,01757
1968—#91063
1967—#84871
1966—#80083
1965—#76892
1964—#749105
1963—#704121
1962—#689126
1961#5,8516#586182
1960—#598172
1959#6,2455#612160
1958#3,74711#603162
1957—#680126
1956—#699112
1955#5,8285#97659
1954#5,7535#1,16941
1953—#1,18939
1952—#1,37830
1951—#1,27933
1950—#1,36428
1949—#99749
1948—#81370
1947—#71991
1946—#77374
1945—#89950
1944—#86154
1943—#84661
1942—#1,21433
1941—#1,20930
1940—#1,06737
1939—#1,63617
1938—#1,61318
1937—#1,31326
1936—#1,58718
1935—#1,75716
1934—#1,78316
1933—#2,21411
1932—#2,31311
1931—#2,8648
1930—#2,44411
1929——
1928—#2,38712
1927——
1926—#2,9049
1925—#3,4087
1924——
1923—#3,1758
1922—#2,63011
1921—#2,15215
1920—#2,9679
1919——
1918—#3,3687
1917—#2,9568
1916——
1915——
1914—#2,4578
1913—#1,67611
1912——
1911——
1910——
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900—#1,3105
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1900

The first year at least five boys were named Les! It came in at #1,310, and was given to 5 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1900–1912, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Les is popular in 1959

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedNHWashington: #320 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 3,934 boysWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #335 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 7,046 boysMNIllinois: #629 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 16,621 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedWIMichigan: #555 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 16,078 boysMINew York: #714 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 22,614 boysNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedINOhio: #562 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 16,190 boysOHPennsylvania: #572 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 20,289 boysPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #497 for boys · 22 births · 1 in 8,166 boysCAUtah: #292 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 2,374 boysUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Les, so not publishedHITexas: #586 for boys · 15 births · 1 in 8,211 boysTXFlorida: #562 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 10,739 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Utah#292 · 1 in 2,374
  2. Washington#320 · 1 in 3,934
  3. Minnesota#335 · 1 in 7,046
  4. California#497 · 1 in 8,166
  5. Michigan#555 · 1 in 16,078

Best ever in a state: #183 in Montana, 1960.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Utah#29251 in 2,374
Washington#32081 in 3,934
Minnesota#33561 in 7,046
California#497221 in 8,166
Michigan#55561 in 16,078
Florida#56251 in 10,739
Ohio#56271 in 16,190
Pennsylvania#57261 in 20,289
Texas#586151 in 8,211
Illinois#62971 in 16,621
New York#71481 in 22,614
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Les
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 5,155 spots since 2024 (#12,349 → #7,194)
  • 308 spots since 2020 (#7,502 → #7,194)
  • 297 spots since 2015 (#7,491 → #7,194)
  • Biggest jump: 368 spots in 1943 (#1,214 → #846)
  • Biggest drop: 367 spots in 1950 (#997 → #1,364)
Rise & fade · boys
61 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1900
  • Peaked 1961 at #586 (182 births)
  • Births halved by 1966, 5 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 21 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 21 yrs · run 1955–1968
Share of babies · boys
1 in 11,671
  • Highest: 1 in 11,671 boys born in 1961 were named Les (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 155,280 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1960s
  • 31.1% of all boys named Les (1,072) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1900s5#1,310 (1900)#1,310
1910s34#1,676 (1913)#2,614
1920s71#2,152 (1921)#2,803
1930s152#1,313 (1937)#1,952
1940s549#719 (1947)#940
1950s790#603 (1958)#995
1960s1,072#586 (1961)#767
1970s307#1,117 (1970)#1,758
1980s183#2,255 (1988)#2,885
1990s75#4,407 (1990)#6,589
2000s70#5,297 (2000)#8,920
2010s95#6,053 (2016)#8,235
2020s45#7,194 (2025)#9,834

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Les in 1959

girls
#6,245
5 births · 1 in 404,692 girls
boys
#612
160 births · 1 in 13,341 boys

Top girls' names in 1959

  1. #1Mary54,502
  2. #2Susan41,617
  3. #3Linda40,410
  4. #4Karen36,784
  5. #5Donna36,468
  6. #6Patricia35,223
  7. #7Debra31,388
  8. #8Cynthia30,186
  9. #9Deborah29,546
  10. #10Lisa25,699
  11. #6,245Les5

Top boys' names in 1959

  1. #1Michael85,294
  2. #2David83,977
  3. #3James78,648
  4. #4John76,446
  5. #5Robert74,542
  6. #6Mark56,945
  7. #7William51,386
  8. #8Richard47,202
  9. #9Thomas40,296
  10. #10Steven33,597
  11. #612Les160
More about 1959

girls

2,023,462 girls got a published name in 1959; 1 in 404,692 of them was named Les, which outranked 13.3% of the 7,202 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Les
  1. #5,566Zettie6
  2. #5,566Zipporah6
  3. #5,566Zonia6
  4. #6,245Les5
  5. #6,245Abbigail5
  6. #6,245Abelina5
  7. #6,245Abigale5

Tied with 957 names at #6,245; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1958
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,090Alesia#1,985 → #895
  2. ↑ 948Tori#1,791 → #843
  3. ↑ 440Taryn#1,211 → #771
  4. ↑ 437Venus#1,007 → #570
  5. ↑ 393Vilma#1,364 → #971
Fallers
  1. ↓ 283Dani#961 → #1,244
  2. ↓ 257Nicki#973 → #1,230
  3. ↓ 235Lanita#973 → #1,208
  4. ↓ 219Concetta#973 → #1,192
  5. ↓ 197Gisele#766 → #963

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

2,134,518 boys got a published name in 1959; 1 in 13,341 of them was named Les, which outranked 86.6% of the 4,572 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 29.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Les
  1. #607Emil161
  2. #607Fabian161
  3. #607Lanny161
  4. #612Les160
  5. #613Hank159
  6. #613Santos159
  7. #613Thurman159
Biggest movers since 1958
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,208Efrem#3,033 → #825
  2. ↑ 901Darin#1,677 → #776
  3. ↑ 871Yancy#1,557 → #686
  4. ↑ 708Raynard#1,677 → #969
  5. ↑ 644Darrin#1,396 → #752
Fallers
  1. ↓ 307Jace#761 → #1,068
  2. ↓ 241Otha#915 → #1,156
  3. ↓ 234Cheryl#994 → #1,228
  4. ↓ 230Dann#969 → #1,199
  5. ↓ 227Carnell#777 → #1,004

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1959 →