Lian
- #3,577 for girls in 2025, 42 births
- #428 for boys in 2025, 752 births
- Given to boys 80.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2025 · 752 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,579since 1984
Lian over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,577 | 42 | #428 | 752 |
| 2024 | #4,387 | 32 | #512 | 595 |
| 2023 | #5,126 | 25 | #582 | 493 |
| 2022 | #3,827 | 39 | #686 | 393 |
| 2021 | #3,215 | 50 | #740 | 345 |
| 2020 | #3,498 | 43 | #792 | 293 |
| 2019 | #4,072 | 35 | #826 | 273 |
| 2018 | #3,677 | 41 | #992 | 209 |
| 2017 | #3,192 | 50 | #1,036 | 194 |
| 2016 | #3,411 | 46 | #1,022 | 196 |
| 2015 | #3,842 | 39 | #1,141 | 165 |
| 2014 | #4,768 | 29 | #1,414 | 119 |
| 2013 | #3,367 | 47 | #1,483 | 110 |
| 2012 | #3,782 | 41 | #1,849 | 79 |
| 2011 | #6,564 | 19 | #1,947 | 71 |
| 2010 | #3,889 | 39 | #2,262 | 57 |
| 2009 | #4,571 | 32 | #2,800 | 43 |
| 2008 | #5,574 | 25 | #3,921 | 26 |
| 2007 | #4,944 | 29 | #3,511 | 30 |
| 2006 | #7,142 | 17 | #4,105 | 23 |
| 2005 | #6,820 | 17 | #5,875 | 13 |
| 2004 | #5,744 | 21 | #6,138 | 12 |
| 2003 | #5,092 | 24 | #5,271 | 14 |
| 2002 | #6,392 | 17 | #5,131 | 14 |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | #5,667 | 12 |
| 2000 | #6,208 | 17 | #7,416 | 8 |
| 1999 | #6,836 | 14 | — | |
| 1998 | #5,123 | 20 | — | |
| 1997 | #5,417 | 18 | — | |
| 1996 | #6,064 | 15 | #9,015 | 5 |
| 1995 | #9,553 | 8 | #6,992 | 7 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | — | |
| 1993 | #6,622 | 13 | #7,638 | 6 |
| 1992 | #6,314 | 14 | #6,670 | 7 |
| 1991 | #5,004 | 19 | #8,236 | 5 |
| 1990 | #5,060 | 18 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #5,049 | 17 | — | |
| 1988 | #4,653 | 18 | — | |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | — | |
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | — | |
| 1985 | #7,563 | 8 | — | |
| 1984 | — | #6,315 | 5 | |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | — | |
| 1982 | #8,224 | 7 | — | |
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | — | |
| 1980 | #5,544 | 12 | — | |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | — | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 | — | |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | — | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | #5,642 | 7 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | — | |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | — | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 | — | |
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | — | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | — | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1984
The first year at least five boys were named Lian! It came in at #6,315, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1984–1991, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Lian is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Delaware#114 · 1 in 327
- New Jersey#284 · 1 in 1,283
- Arizona#288 · 1 in 1,212
- Florida#307 · 1 in 1,516
- Texas#309 · 1 in 1,435
Best ever in a state: #114 in Delaware, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | #114 | 9 | 1 in 327 |
| New Jersey | #284 | 31 | 1 in 1,283 |
| Arizona | #288 | 27 | 1 in 1,212 |
| Florida | #307 | 63 | 1 in 1,516 |
| Texas | #309 | 122 | 1 in 1,435 |
| Nevada | #323 | 9 | 1 in 1,255 |
| Illinois | #345 | 31 | 1 in 1,598 |
| Tennessee | #355 | 24 | 1 in 1,532 |
| California | #357 | 98 | 1 in 1,791 |
| Colorado | #366 | 17 | 1 in 1,579 |
| Georgia | #375 | 31 | 1 in 1,620 |
| North Carolina | #381 | 29 | 1 in 1,775 |
| Virginia | #382 | 21 | 1 in 1,774 |
| Maryland | #389 | 13 | 1 in 1,761 |
| Iowa | #399 | 8 | 1 in 1,729 |
| Oklahoma | #426 | 10 | 1 in 1,768 |
| New York | #434 | 39 | 1 in 2,165 |
| Massachusetts | #438 | 11 | 1 in 2,456 |
| Minnesota | #477 | 11 | 1 in 2,227 |
| South Carolina | #501 | 9 | 1 in 2,355 |
| Washington | #502 | 14 | 1 in 2,343 |
| Mississippi | #522 | 5 | 1 in 2,167 |
| Wisconsin | #523 | 9 | 1 in 2,604 |
| Kansas | #524 | 6 | 1 in 2,341 |
| Alabama | #525 | 9 | 1 in 2,391 |
| Kentucky | #526 | 8 | 1 in 2,567 |
| Oregon | #529 | 6 | 1 in 2,510 |
| Indiana | #621 | 10 | 1 in 3,166 |
| Pennsylvania | #662 | 13 | 1 in 4,020 |
| Louisiana | #672 | 6 | 1 in 3,188 |
| Utah | #703 | 5 | 1 in 3,933 |
| Ohio | #710 | 12 | 1 in 4,378 |
| Michigan | #768 | 9 | 1 in 4,466 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lian
Momentum · boys
Rising
- 364 spots since 2020 (#792 → #428)
- Biggest jump: 166 spots in 2019
Rise & fade · boys
41 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1984
- Peaked 2025 at #428 (752 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 8 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 8 yrs · run 2018–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 2,271
- Highest: 1 in 2,271 boys born in 2025 were named Lian (0.04%)
Era · boys
The 2020s
- 62.7% of all boys named Lian (2,871) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2006
- Mostly girls until 2005, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5 | #6,315 (1984) | #6,315 |
| 1990s | 35 | #6,670 (1992) | #7,778 |
| 2000s | 195 | #2,800 (2009) | #4,984 |
| 2010s | 1,473 | #826 (2019) | #1,397 |
| 2020s | 2,871 | #428 (2025) | #623 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Lian ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: