Lidia
#1,587 for girls in 2025, 132 births
- Peak · girls
- 1937 · 75 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 11,326since 1888
Lidia over time
Rank among girls' names. Lidia has never cracked the top 700 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,587 | 132 |
| 2024 | #1,484 | 147 |
| 2023 | #1,736 | 118 |
| 2022 | #1,621 | 130 |
| 2021 | #1,676 | 124 |
| 2020 | #1,642 | 126 |
| 2019 | #1,642 | 129 |
| 2018 | #1,672 | 125 |
| 2017 | #1,545 | 142 |
| 2016 | #1,505 | 151 |
| 2015 | #1,488 | 154 |
| 2014 | #1,436 | 158 |
| 2013 | #1,446 | 155 |
| 2012 | #1,396 | 165 |
| 2011 | #1,292 | 182 |
| 2010 | #1,206 | 200 |
| 2009 | #1,218 | 204 |
| 2008 | #1,076 | 243 |
| 2007 | #1,199 | 210 |
| 2006 | #1,140 | 215 |
| 2005 | #1,189 | 193 |
| 2004 | #1,144 | 199 |
| 2003 | #1,267 | 165 |
| 2002 | #1,126 | 185 |
| 2001 | #1,122 | 188 |
| 2000 | #1,154 | 175 |
| 1999 | #1,212 | 157 |
| 1998 | #1,099 | 175 |
| 1997 | #1,187 | 153 |
| 1996 | #1,049 | 176 |
| 1995 | #1,023 | 178 |
| 1994 | #994 | 186 |
| 1993 | #1,081 | 168 |
| 1992 | #1,068 | 170 |
| 1991 | #1,016 | 181 |
| 1990 | #1,175 | 146 |
| 1989 | #1,164 | 141 |
| 1988 | #1,354 | 105 |
| 1987 | #1,249 | 113 |
| 1986 | #1,233 | 111 |
| 1985 | #1,163 | 122 |
| 1984 | #1,315 | 93 |
| 1983 | #1,194 | 108 |
| 1982 | #1,277 | 100 |
| 1981 | #1,277 | 100 |
| 1980 | #1,250 | 104 |
| 1979 | #1,314 | 95 |
| 1978 | #1,265 | 97 |
| 1977 | #1,404 | 80 |
| 1976 | #1,145 | 102 |
| 1975 | #1,162 | 99 |
| 1974 | #1,204 | 92 |
| 1973 | #1,109 | 101 |
| 1972 | #1,090 | 104 |
| 1971 | #1,211 | 93 |
| 1970 | #1,108 | 106 |
| 1969 | #1,176 | 90 |
| 1968 | #1,210 | 81 |
| 1967 | #1,103 | 89 |
| 1966 | #1,161 | 84 |
| 1965 | #1,019 | 105 |
| 1964 | #1,293 | 74 |
| 1963 | #1,226 | 80 |
| 1962 | #1,332 | 69 |
| 1961 | #1,305 | 72 |
| 1960 | #1,174 | 86 |
| 1959 | #1,192 | 80 |
| 1958 | #1,180 | 81 |
| 1957 | #1,228 | 73 |
| 1956 | #1,241 | 70 |
| 1955 | #1,361 | 54 |
| 1954 | #1,118 | 78 |
| 1953 | #1,082 | 79 |
| 1952 | #1,210 | 62 |
| 1951 | #1,266 | 54 |
| 1950 | #1,041 | 77 |
| 1949 | #1,038 | 74 |
| 1948 | #1,250 | 53 |
| 1947 | #1,193 | 57 |
| 1946 | #1,148 | 55 |
| 1945 | #1,060 | 54 |
| 1944 | #1,072 | 53 |
| 1943 | #1,113 | 52 |
| 1942 | #1,006 | 60 |
| 1941 | #986 | 55 |
| 1940 | #1,010 | 50 |
| 1939 | #1,053 | 46 |
| 1938 | #923 | 59 |
| 1937 | #788 | 75 |
| 1936 | #909 | 56 |
| 1935 | #884 | 61 |
| 1934 | #1,221 | 34 |
| 1933 | #1,024 | 46 |
| 1932 | #979 | 52 |
| 1931 | #1,104 | 41 |
| 1930 | #1,059 | 48 |
| 1929 | #951 | 57 |
| 1928 | #936 | 63 |
| 1927 | #976 | 61 |
| 1926 | #1,079 | 48 |
| 1925 | #1,008 | 55 |
| 1924 | #1,440 | 33 |
| 1923 | #1,637 | 26 |
| 1922 | #1,309 | 36 |
| 1921 | #1,625 | 27 |
| 1920 | #1,751 | 23 |
| 1919 | #1,604 | 25 |
| 1918 | #1,380 | 31 |
| 1917 | #1,431 | 27 |
| 1916 | #1,867 | 18 |
| 1915 | #2,688 | 10 |
| 1914 | #1,818 | 14 |
| 1913 | #2,331 | 8 |
| 1912 | #1,620 | 12 |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | #2,061 | 5 |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,486 | 7 |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,793 | 5 |
| 1901 | #1,679 | 5 |
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 |
| 1899 | #1,596 | 5 |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,583 | 5 |
| 1895 | #1,299 | 7 |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,437 | 5 |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,147 | 6 |
| 1888 | #1,136 | 6 |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Lidia! It came in at #1,136, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1890–1894, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Lidia is popular in 2004
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Georgia#628 · 1 in 3,368
- Michigan#636 · 1 in 4,020
- Tennessee#715 · 1 in 4,352
- California#848 · 1 in 5,721
- Arizona#960 · 1 in 5,737
Best ever in a state: #173 in Arizona, 1925.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | #628 | 15 | 1 in 3,368 |
| Michigan | #636 | 12 | 1 in 4,020 |
| Tennessee | #715 | 7 | 1 in 4,352 |
| California | #848 | 40 | 1 in 5,721 |
| Arizona | #960 | 6 | 1 in 5,737 |
| North Carolina | #982 | 7 | 1 in 6,350 |
| Texas | #1,064 | 22 | 1 in 7,240 |
| New York | #1,114 | 12 | 1 in 8,084 |
| Florida | #1,128 | 10 | 1 in 8,201 |
| Ohio | #1,164 | 6 | 1 in 9,587 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lidia
- 103 spots since 2024 (#1,484 → #1,587)
- 55 spots since 2020 (#1,642 → #1,587)
- 99 spots since 2015 (#1,488 → #1,587)
- Biggest jump: 337 spots in 1935 (#1,221 → #884)
- Biggest drop: 135 spots in 1938 (#788 → #923)
- Debuted 1888
- Peaked 1937 at #788 (75 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 10 yrs · run 1935–1938
- Highest: 1 in 7,782 girls born in 2008 were named Lidia (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 12,176 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #788 in 1937, was only 1 in 14,187 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 17.5% of all girls named Lidia (1,977) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 12 | #1,136 (1888) | #1,142 |
| 1890s | 22 | #1,299 (1895) | #1,479 |
| 1900s | 28 | #1,486 (1904) | #1,748 |
| 1910s | 145 | #1,380 (1918) | #1,842 |
| 1920s | 429 | #936 (1928) | #1,271 |
| 1930s | 518 | #788 (1937) | #994 |
| 1940s | 563 | #986 (1941) | #1,088 |
| 1950s | 708 | #1,041 (1950) | #1,192 |
| 1960s | 830 | #1,019 (1965) | #1,200 |
| 1970s | 969 | #1,090 (1972) | #1,201 |
| 1980s | 1,097 | #1,163 (1985) | #1,248 |
| 1990s | 1,690 | #994 (1994) | #1,090 |
| 2000s | 1,977 | #1,076 (2008) | #1,164 |
| 2010s | 1,561 | #1,206 (2010) | #1,463 |
| 2020s | 777 | #1,484 (2024) | #1,624 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lidia in 2004
Top girls' names in 2004
More about 2004
girls
1,836,250 girls got a published name in 2004; 1 in 9,227 of them was named Lidia, which outranked 93.9% of the 18,835 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,140Breonna200
- #1,140Danae200
- #1,140Nadine200
- #1,144Lidia199
- #1,144Akira199
- #1,144Anabella199
- #1,144Audra199
- #1,149Azaria198
- #1,149Kylah198
- #1,151Dina197
Tied with 4 names at #1,144; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.