Lila

#186 for girls in 2025, 1,670 births · Last seen for boys in 1939 at #3,113
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2010 · 1,969 births
Debut · girls
36 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
76,493
since 1880

Lila over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Lila has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201978peak #155, 2010girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1861,670—
2024#2061,482—
2023#2131,401—
2022#2211,354—
2021#2231,341—
2020#2281,298—
2019#2281,373—
2018#2251,405—
2017#2101,474—
2016#2101,561—
2015#1991,658—
2014#1841,776—
2013#1901,703—
2012#1821,728—
2011#1631,921—
2010#1551,969—
2009#1671,935—
2008#1801,852—
2007#2591,357—
2006#3291,006—
2005#446680—
2004#489599—
2003#569492—
2002#618414—
2001#641394—
2000#749307—
1999#723312—
1998#930224—
1997#1,175156—
1996#1,311131—
1995#1,330124—
1994#1,239139—
1993#1,495106—
1992#1,452109—
1991#1,257134—
1990#1,300125—
1989#1,250126—
1988#1,376103—
1987#1,257112—
1986#1,215114—
1985#1,096132—
1984#1,27998—
1983#1,106123—
1982#994148—
1981#982149—
1980#986150—
1979#1,025137—
1978#1,135114—
1977#1,097118—
1976#1,086112—
1975#1,127103—
1974#876148—
1973#911135—
1972#928132—
1971#1,074112—
1970#1,012123—
1969#888141—
1968#966115—
1967#911126—
1966#823146—
1965#767167—
1964#677227—
1963#661234—
1962#738195—
1961#629263—
1960#578291—
1959#559304—
1958#577293—
1957#496362—
1956#443428—
1955#483355—
1954#465359—
1953#458340—
1952#418414—
1951#439363—
1950#432351—
1949#405388—
1948#388421—
1947#395411—
1946#386386—
1945#362368—
1944#337414—
1943#315487—
1942#316482—
1941#282522—
1940#270529—
1939#284482#3,1136
1938#275531—
1937#257578—
1936#244646—
1935#226753#2,9517
1934#210844#2,7428
1933#204859—
1932#193949#3,7765
1931#183995#3,7635
1930#1701,203#4,0015
1929#1801,108—
1928#1951,034#4,1515
1927#1931,059—
1926#1901,085—
1925#1741,248—
1924#1991,053#4,3475
1923#1961,064—
1922#212919#4,3075
1921#213894—
1920#227840#3,8156
1919#227749—
1918#231748—
1917#240678—
1916#230708—
1915#230684—
1914#226561—
1913#231430—
1912#226396—
1911#227302—
1910#209311—
1909#218259—
1908#213254—
1907#224218—
1906#196242—
1905#212211—
1904#185259—
1903#203206—
1902#189239—
1901#214181—
1900#191268—
1899#202190—
1898#204208—
1897#206176—
1896#195201—
1895#204175—
1894#210161—
1893#198167—
1892#211147—
1891#208128—
1890#222120—
1889#217113—
1888#24788—
1887#24374—
1886#24869—
1885#25462—
1884#22173—
1883#21069—
1882#20565—
1881#24442—
1880#25436—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Lila was already there! It came in at #254, and was given to 36 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 43 girls a year got the name.

Where Lila is popular in 1978

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,104 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 11,817 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMINew York: #1,070 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 10,925 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedRIOregon: #454 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,089 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedINOhio: #874 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 11,492 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,060 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 10,222 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMSAlabama: #567 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,350 girlsALGeorgia: #669 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,375 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedHITexas: #1,106 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 11,488 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Oregon#454 · 1 in 3,089
  2. Alabama#567 · 1 in 4,350
  3. Georgia#669 · 1 in 5,375
  4. Ohio#874 · 1 in 11,492
  5. California#1,060 · 1 in 10,222

Best ever in a state: #39 in Idaho, 1931.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Oregon#45451 in 3,089
Alabama#56751 in 4,350
Georgia#66961 in 5,375
Ohio#87461 in 11,492
California#1,060151 in 10,222
New York#1,07091 in 10,925
Illinois#1,10461 in 11,817
Texas#1,10691 in 11,488
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lila
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 20 spots since 2024 (#206 → #186)
  • 42 spots since 2020 (#228 → #186)
  • 13 spots since 2015 (#199 → #186)
  • Biggest jump: 245 spots in 1998 (#1,175 → #930)
  • Biggest drop: 251 spots in 1975 (#876 → #1,127)
Rise & fade · girls
130 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2010 at #155 (1,969 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 124 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 124 yrs · run 1880–1969
Share of babies · girls
1 in 903
  • Highest: 1 in 903 girls born in 2010 were named Lila (0.11%)
  • Latest: 1 in 962 girls born in 2025 (0.10%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 21.7% of all girls named Lila (16,568) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #170 (1930) → #1,495 (1993) → #155 (2010)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s691#205 (1882)#234
1890s1,673#195 (1896)#206
1900s2,337#185 (1904)#205
1910s5,567#209 (1910)#228
1920s10,304#174 (1925)#198
1930s7,840#170 (1930)#225
1940s4,408#270 (1940)#346
1950s3,569#418 (1952)#477
1960s1,905#578 (1960)#764
1970s1,234#876 (1974)#1,027
1980s1,255#982 (1981)#1,154
1990s1,560#723 (1999)#1,221
2000s9,036#167 (2009)#445
2010s16,568#155 (2010)#195
2020s8,546#186 (2025)#213

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lila in 1978

girls
#1,135
114 births · 1 in 13,437 girls

Top girls' names in 1978

  1. #1Jennifer56,314
  2. #2Melissa28,327
  3. #3Jessica26,102
  4. #4Amy23,213
  5. #5Heather22,270
  6. #6Amanda20,520
  7. #7Angela20,517
  8. #8Sarah19,976
  9. #9Michelle18,856
  10. #10Nicole17,279
  11. #1,135Lila114
More about 1978

girls

1,531,859 girls got a published name in 1978; 1 in 13,437 of them was named Lila, which outranked 90.1% of the 11,475 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lila
  1. #1,126Tamisha115
  2. #1,126Valeria115
  3. #1,126Violet115
  4. #1,135Lila114
  5. #1,135Thea114
  6. #1,135Viviana114
  7. #1,138Jesica113
  8. #1,138Kendall113
  9. #1,138Shawnte113

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1977
Risers
  1. ↑ 4,240Aja#4,652 → #412
  2. ↑ 1,987Kiley#2,606 → #619
  3. ↑ 1,951Kylee#2,838 → #887
  4. ↑ 1,785Winter#2,780 → #995
  5. ↑ 1,620Kylie#2,026 → #406
Fallers
  1. ↓ 913Shalon#868 → #1,781
  2. ↓ 760Farah#854 → #1,614
  3. ↓ 519Tennille#462 → #981
  4. ↓ 398Shawnte#740 → #1,138
  5. ↓ 362Farrah#177 → #539

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1978 →