Lila

#186 for girls in 2025, 1,670 births · Last seen for boys in 1939 at #3,113
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2010 · 1,969 births
Debut · girls
36 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
76,493
since 1880

Lila over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Lila has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201990peak #155, 2010girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1861,670—
2024#2061,482—
2023#2131,401—
2022#2211,354—
2021#2231,341—
2020#2281,298—
2019#2281,373—
2018#2251,405—
2017#2101,474—
2016#2101,561—
2015#1991,658—
2014#1841,776—
2013#1901,703—
2012#1821,728—
2011#1631,921—
2010#1551,969—
2009#1671,935—
2008#1801,852—
2007#2591,357—
2006#3291,006—
2005#446680—
2004#489599—
2003#569492—
2002#618414—
2001#641394—
2000#749307—
1999#723312—
1998#930224—
1997#1,175156—
1996#1,311131—
1995#1,330124—
1994#1,239139—
1993#1,495106—
1992#1,452109—
1991#1,257134—
1990#1,300125—
1989#1,250126—
1988#1,376103—
1987#1,257112—
1986#1,215114—
1985#1,096132—
1984#1,27998—
1983#1,106123—
1982#994148—
1981#982149—
1980#986150—
1979#1,025137—
1978#1,135114—
1977#1,097118—
1976#1,086112—
1975#1,127103—
1974#876148—
1973#911135—
1972#928132—
1971#1,074112—
1970#1,012123—
1969#888141—
1968#966115—
1967#911126—
1966#823146—
1965#767167—
1964#677227—
1963#661234—
1962#738195—
1961#629263—
1960#578291—
1959#559304—
1958#577293—
1957#496362—
1956#443428—
1955#483355—
1954#465359—
1953#458340—
1952#418414—
1951#439363—
1950#432351—
1949#405388—
1948#388421—
1947#395411—
1946#386386—
1945#362368—
1944#337414—
1943#315487—
1942#316482—
1941#282522—
1940#270529—
1939#284482#3,1136
1938#275531—
1937#257578—
1936#244646—
1935#226753#2,9517
1934#210844#2,7428
1933#204859—
1932#193949#3,7765
1931#183995#3,7635
1930#1701,203#4,0015
1929#1801,108—
1928#1951,034#4,1515
1927#1931,059—
1926#1901,085—
1925#1741,248—
1924#1991,053#4,3475
1923#1961,064—
1922#212919#4,3075
1921#213894—
1920#227840#3,8156
1919#227749—
1918#231748—
1917#240678—
1916#230708—
1915#230684—
1914#226561—
1913#231430—
1912#226396—
1911#227302—
1910#209311—
1909#218259—
1908#213254—
1907#224218—
1906#196242—
1905#212211—
1904#185259—
1903#203206—
1902#189239—
1901#214181—
1900#191268—
1899#202190—
1898#204208—
1897#206176—
1896#195201—
1895#204175—
1894#210161—
1893#198167—
1892#211147—
1891#208128—
1890#222120—
1889#217113—
1888#24788—
1887#24374—
1886#24869—
1885#25462—
1884#22173—
1883#21069—
1882#20565—
1881#24442—
1880#25436—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Lila was already there! It came in at #254, and was given to 36 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 43 girls a year got the name.

Where Lila is popular in 1990

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNHWashington: #681 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,151 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedWIMichigan: #1,118 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 12,495 girlsMINew York: #920 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 8,137 girlsNYMassachusetts: #680 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,456 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,230 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 12,497 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Lila, so not publishedHITexas: #1,425 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 15,287 girlsTXFlorida: #1,411 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 15,826 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Massachusetts#680 · 1 in 6,456
  2. Washington#681 · 1 in 5,151
  3. New York#920 · 1 in 8,137
  4. Michigan#1,118 · 1 in 12,495
  5. California#1,230 · 1 in 12,497

Best ever in a state: #39 in Idaho, 1931.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Massachusetts#68061 in 6,456
Washington#68161 in 5,151
New York#920151 in 8,137
Michigan#1,11851 in 12,495
California#1,230211 in 12,497
Florida#1,41151 in 15,826
Texas#1,42591 in 15,287
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lila
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 20 spots since 2024 (#206 → #186)
  • 42 spots since 2020 (#228 → #186)
  • 13 spots since 2015 (#199 → #186)
  • Biggest jump: 245 spots in 1998 (#1,175 → #930)
  • Biggest drop: 251 spots in 1975 (#876 → #1,127)
Rise & fade · girls
130 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2010 at #155 (1,969 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 124 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 124 yrs · run 1880–1969
Share of babies · girls
1 in 903
  • Highest: 1 in 903 girls born in 2010 were named Lila (0.11%)
  • Latest: 1 in 962 girls born in 2025 (0.10%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 21.7% of all girls named Lila (16,568) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #170 (1930) → #1,495 (1993) → #155 (2010)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s691#205 (1882)#234
1890s1,673#195 (1896)#206
1900s2,337#185 (1904)#205
1910s5,567#209 (1910)#228
1920s10,304#174 (1925)#198
1930s7,840#170 (1930)#225
1940s4,408#270 (1940)#346
1950s3,569#418 (1952)#477
1960s1,905#578 (1960)#764
1970s1,234#876 (1974)#1,027
1980s1,255#982 (1981)#1,154
1990s1,560#723 (1999)#1,221
2000s9,036#167 (2009)#445
2010s16,568#155 (2010)#195
2020s8,546#186 (2025)#213

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lila in 1990

girls
#1,300
125 births · 1 in 15,188 girls

Top girls' names in 1990

  1. #1Jessica46,486
  2. #2Ashley45,561
  3. #3Brittany36,536
  4. #4Amanda34,413
  5. #5Samantha25,868
  6. #6Sarah25,824
  7. #7Stephanie24,864
  8. #8Jennifer22,236
  9. #9Elizabeth20,750
  10. #10Lauren20,506
  11. #1,300Lila125
More about 1990

girls

1,898,547 girls got a published name in 1990; 1 in 15,188 of them was named Lila, which outranked 91.5% of the 15,234 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lila
  1. #1,292Misha126
  2. #1,292Monet126
  3. #1,292Myesha126
  4. #1,300Lila125
  5. #1,300Deena125
  6. #1,300Ilana125
  7. #1,300Josefina125
  8. #1,307Brea124
  9. #1,307Cherelle124
  10. #1,307Franchesca124

Tied with 6 names at #1,300; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1989
Risers
  1. ↑ 5,592Alannah#6,531 → #939
  2. ↑ 1,178Symone#1,998 → #820
  3. ↑ 869Shelbi#1,750 → #881
  4. ↑ 831Latifah#1,532 → #701
  5. ↑ 828Skyler#1,564 → #736
Fallers
  1. ↓ 2,554Elizabet#524 → #3,078
  2. ↓ 1,572Katherin#717 → #2,289
  3. ↓ 652Stephani#390 → #1,042
  4. ↓ 504Ashanti#893 → #1,397
  5. ↓ 416Audrianna#759 → #1,175

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1990 →