Lisabeth
- Last seen for girls in 2018 at #12,464
- Peak · girls
- 1958 · 61 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,265since 1938
Lisabeth over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Lisabeth has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | |
| 2024 | — | |
| 2023 | — | |
| 2022 | — | |
| 2021 | — | |
| 2020 | — | |
| 2019 | — | |
| 2018 | #12,464 | 7 |
| 2017 | — | |
| 2016 | — | |
| 2015 | — | |
| 2014 | — | |
| 2013 | — | |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 |
| 2010 | — | |
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 |
| 2007 | — | |
| 2006 | #15,152 | 6 |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 |
| 2004 | — | |
| 2003 | — | |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 |
| 2001 | — | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 |
| 1999 | — | |
| 1998 | #12,426 | 6 |
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 |
| 1996 | #10,567 | 7 |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 |
| 1993 | #7,038 | 12 |
| 1992 | #8,734 | 9 |
| 1991 | #6,976 | 12 |
| 1990 | #6,465 | 13 |
| 1989 | #5,545 | 15 |
| 1988 | #8,391 | 8 |
| 1987 | #3,983 | 21 |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 |
| 1985 | #6,955 | 9 |
| 1984 | #3,874 | 20 |
| 1983 | #4,686 | 15 |
| 1982 | #5,209 | 13 |
| 1981 | #3,859 | 20 |
| 1980 | #3,992 | 19 |
| 1979 | #5,751 | 11 |
| 1978 | #4,459 | 15 |
| 1977 | #3,911 | 18 |
| 1976 | #3,002 | 24 |
| 1975 | #4,141 | 15 |
| 1974 | #4,227 | 14 |
| 1973 | #3,015 | 22 |
| 1972 | #3,404 | 18 |
| 1971 | #3,652 | 17 |
| 1970 | #2,354 | 32 |
| 1969 | #1,784 | 47 |
| 1968 | #2,360 | 27 |
| 1967 | #1,783 | 42 |
| 1966 | #2,453 | 24 |
| 1965 | #1,672 | 45 |
| 1964 | #1,686 | 47 |
| 1963 | #1,754 | 43 |
| 1962 | #1,708 | 44 |
| 1961 | #2,004 | 34 |
| 1960 | #2,013 | 32 |
| 1959 | #1,720 | 41 |
| 1958 | #1,349 | 61 |
| 1957 | #1,928 | 32 |
| 1956 | #1,738 | 37 |
| 1955 | #1,733 | 36 |
| 1954 | #1,909 | 30 |
| 1953 | #2,173 | 23 |
| 1952 | #1,781 | 31 |
| 1951 | #2,116 | 22 |
| 1950 | #2,253 | 19 |
| 1949 | #2,999 | 12 |
| 1948 | #2,701 | 14 |
| 1947 | #2,146 | 21 |
| 1946 | #3,034 | 11 |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | #4,054 | 6 |
| 1943 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,986 | 10 |
| 1941 | — | |
| 1940 | — | |
| 1939 | — | |
| 1938 | #4,342 | 5 |
| 1937 | — | |
| 1936 | — | |
| 1935 | — | |
| 1934 | — | |
| 1933 | — | |
| 1932 | — | |
| 1931 | — | |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | — | |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
First appearance
1938
The first year at least five girls were named Lisabeth! It came in at #4,342, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1938–1941, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Lisabeth is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Lisabeth in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Lisabeth
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2018
Rise & fade · girls
20 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1938
- Peaked 1958 at #1,349 (61 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 32,977
- Highest: 1 in 32,977 girls born in 1958 were named Lisabeth (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 243,011 girls born in 2018 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1960s
- 30.4% of all girls named Lisabeth (385) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 5 | #4,342 (1938) | #4,342 |
| 1940s | 74 | #2,146 (1947) | #2,987 |
| 1950s | 332 | #1,349 (1958) | #1,870 |
| 1960s | 385 | #1,672 (1965) | #1,922 |
| 1970s | 186 | #2,354 (1970) | #3,792 |
| 1980s | 149 | #3,859 (1981) | #5,363 |
| 1990s | 80 | #6,465 (1990) | #9,375 |
| 2000s | 35 | #12,187 (2002) | #15,007 |
| 2010s | 19 | #12,464 (2018) | #14,083 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Lisabeth ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: