Lisbeth
#5,238 for girls in 2025, 24 births
- Peak · girls
- 2002 · 409 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,934since 1911
Lisbeth over time
Rank among girls' names. Lisbeth has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,238 | 24 |
| 2024 | #3,892 | 38 |
| 2023 | #3,984 | 37 |
| 2022 | #5,172 | 25 |
| 2021 | #3,297 | 48 |
| 2020 | #3,450 | 44 |
| 2019 | #3,272 | 48 |
| 2018 | #4,357 | 32 |
| 2017 | #3,479 | 44 |
| 2016 | #2,966 | 56 |
| 2015 | #3,299 | 49 |
| 2014 | #2,922 | 58 |
| 2013 | #2,804 | 61 |
| 2012 | #2,286 | 82 |
| 2011 | #2,511 | 72 |
| 2010 | #2,258 | 85 |
| 2009 | #1,742 | 125 |
| 2008 | #2,092 | 97 |
| 2007 | #1,760 | 122 |
| 2006 | #1,608 | 133 |
| 2005 | #1,340 | 163 |
| 2004 | #1,107 | 206 |
| 2003 | #742 | 344 |
| 2002 | #624 | 409 |
| 2001 | #1,573 | 118 |
| 2000 | #1,276 | 152 |
| 1999 | #1,212 | 157 |
| 1998 | #1,557 | 106 |
| 1997 | #1,864 | 79 |
| 1996 | #1,685 | 90 |
| 1995 | #1,432 | 113 |
| 1994 | #1,744 | 84 |
| 1993 | #1,653 | 91 |
| 1992 | #1,688 | 89 |
| 1991 | #1,779 | 80 |
| 1990 | #1,905 | 73 |
| 1989 | #1,943 | 66 |
| 1988 | #2,447 | 44 |
| 1987 | #2,309 | 46 |
| 1986 | #2,620 | 37 |
| 1985 | #2,657 | 36 |
| 1984 | #2,515 | 37 |
| 1983 | #2,310 | 41 |
| 1982 | #2,492 | 38 |
| 1981 | #2,847 | 31 |
| 1980 | #2,486 | 38 |
| 1979 | #2,724 | 32 |
| 1978 | #2,237 | 41 |
| 1977 | #2,666 | 31 |
| 1976 | #3,678 | 18 |
| 1975 | #3,259 | 21 |
| 1974 | #2,497 | 30 |
| 1973 | #2,267 | 34 |
| 1972 | #2,976 | 22 |
| 1971 | #3,062 | 22 |
| 1970 | #1,904 | 45 |
| 1969 | #1,809 | 46 |
| 1968 | #2,205 | 30 |
| 1967 | #2,167 | 30 |
| 1966 | #1,532 | 53 |
| 1965 | #1,575 | 50 |
| 1964 | #2,040 | 34 |
| 1963 | #1,683 | 46 |
| 1962 | #1,577 | 51 |
| 1961 | #1,720 | 44 |
| 1960 | #1,454 | 57 |
| 1959 | #1,516 | 51 |
| 1958 | #1,364 | 60 |
| 1957 | #1,652 | 42 |
| 1956 | #1,548 | 47 |
| 1955 | #1,102 | 82 |
| 1954 | #1,154 | 74 |
| 1953 | #1,130 | 74 |
| 1952 | #1,171 | 66 |
| 1951 | #1,203 | 60 |
| 1950 | #1,411 | 42 |
| 1949 | #1,376 | 45 |
| 1948 | #1,209 | 56 |
| 1947 | #1,127 | 63 |
| 1946 | #1,257 | 47 |
| 1945 | #1,660 | 25 |
| 1944 | #2,027 | 18 |
| 1943 | #1,591 | 28 |
| 1942 | #2,311 | 15 |
| 1941 | #2,018 | 17 |
| 1940 | #1,900 | 18 |
| 1939 | #2,125 | 15 |
| 1938 | #2,021 | 16 |
| 1937 | #3,434 | 7 |
| 1936 | #2,032 | 15 |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 |
| 1934 | #2,424 | 12 |
| 1933 | #2,540 | 11 |
| 1932 | #2,490 | 12 |
| 1931 | #3,497 | 7 |
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 |
| 1929 | #3,394 | 8 |
| 1928 | #2,954 | 10 |
| 1927 | #4,286 | 6 |
| 1926 | #3,046 | 10 |
| 1925 | #4,426 | 6 |
| 1924 | #3,144 | 10 |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | #3,655 | 8 |
| 1921 | #4,023 | 7 |
| 1920 | #4,398 | 6 |
| 1919 | #3,452 | 8 |
| 1918 | #4,291 | 6 |
| 1917 | #3,713 | 7 |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 |
| 1914 | #2,638 | 8 |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,956 | 7 |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Lisbeth! It came in at #1,956, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1912–1913, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Lisbeth is popular in 2002
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Nevada#264 · 1 in 1,020
- New York#345 · 1 in 1,938
- New Jersey#370 · 1 in 2,169
- Texas#452 · 1 in 2,475
- California#455 · 1 in 2,503
Best ever in a state: #264 in Nevada, 2002.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada | #264 | 10 | 1 in 1,020 |
| New York | #345 | 50 | 1 in 1,938 |
| New Jersey | #370 | 19 | 1 in 2,169 |
| Texas | #452 | 63 | 1 in 2,475 |
| California | #455 | 89 | 1 in 2,503 |
| Virginia | #456 | 14 | 1 in 2,547 |
| Colorado | #465 | 11 | 1 in 2,258 |
| North Carolina | #514 | 15 | 1 in 2,896 |
| Florida | #540 | 24 | 1 in 3,209 |
| Illinois | #542 | 22 | 1 in 3,122 |
| Georgia | #553 | 15 | 1 in 3,227 |
| Arizona | #588 | 11 | 1 in 2,951 |
| South Carolina | #608 | 5 | 1 in 3,301 |
| Oregon | #615 | 5 | 1 in 3,205 |
| Maryland | #665 | 6 | 1 in 3,959 |
| Indiana | #779 | 6 | 1 in 5,380 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lisbeth
- 1,346 spots since 2024 (#3,892 → #5,238)
- 1,788 spots since 2020 (#3,450 → #5,238)
- 1,939 spots since 2015 (#3,299 → #5,238)
- Biggest jump: 949 spots in 2002 (#1,573 → #624)
- Biggest drop: 365 spots in 2004 (#742 → #1,107)
- Debuted 1911
- Peaked 2002 at #624 (409 births)
- Births halved by 2005, 3 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · run 2002–2003
- Highest: 1 in 4,393 girls born in 2002 were named Lisbeth (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 66,969 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 31.5% of all girls named Lisbeth (1,869) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 41 | #1,956 (1911) | #3,387 |
| 1920s | 71 | #2,954 (1928) | #3,703 |
| 1930s | 107 | #2,021 (1938) | #2,843 |
| 1940s | 332 | #1,127 (1947) | #1,648 |
| 1950s | 598 | #1,102 (1955) | #1,325 |
| 1960s | 441 | #1,454 (1960) | #1,776 |
| 1970s | 296 | #1,904 (1970) | #2,727 |
| 1980s | 414 | #1,943 (1989) | #2,463 |
| 1990s | 962 | #1,212 (1999) | #1,652 |
| 2000s | 1,869 | #624 (2002) | #1,386 |
| 2010s | 587 | #2,258 (2010) | #3,015 |
| 2020s | 216 | #3,297 (2021) | #4,172 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lisbeth in 2002
Top girls' names in 2002
More about 2002
girls
1,796,882 girls got a published name in 2002; 1 in 4,393 of them was named Lisbeth, which outranked 96.5% of the 18,086 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.