Lizabeth
#7,491 for girls in 2025, 14 births
- Peak · girls
- 1958 · 189 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,619since 1907
Lizabeth over time
Rank among girls' names. Lizabeth has never cracked the top 700 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #7,491 | 14 |
| 2024 | #7,251 | 15 |
| 2023 | #15,194 | 5 |
| 2022 | #9,056 | 11 |
| 2021 | #7,250 | 15 |
| 2020 | #12,142 | 7 |
| 2019 | #8,597 | 12 |
| 2018 | #5,619 | 22 |
| 2017 | #6,531 | 18 |
| 2016 | #4,531 | 31 |
| 2015 | #8,447 | 13 |
| 2014 | #4,269 | 34 |
| 2013 | #6,017 | 21 |
| 2012 | #4,486 | 32 |
| 2011 | #4,244 | 34 |
| 2010 | #4,494 | 32 |
| 2009 | #5,891 | 23 |
| 2008 | #4,006 | 39 |
| 2007 | #3,918 | 40 |
| 2006 | #4,073 | 36 |
| 2005 | #3,317 | 46 |
| 2004 | #3,071 | 50 |
| 2003 | #2,368 | 70 |
| 2002 | #2,379 | 67 |
| 2001 | #3,009 | 47 |
| 2000 | #3,216 | 42 |
| 1999 | #2,737 | 50 |
| 1998 | #3,015 | 42 |
| 1997 | #2,590 | 49 |
| 1996 | #2,423 | 53 |
| 1995 | #2,735 | 44 |
| 1994 | #1,952 | 72 |
| 1993 | #1,882 | 75 |
| 1992 | #2,488 | 51 |
| 1991 | #1,933 | 72 |
| 1990 | #2,317 | 54 |
| 1989 | #1,943 | 66 |
| 1988 | #2,187 | 52 |
| 1987 | #1,792 | 65 |
| 1986 | #1,890 | 59 |
| 1985 | #1,760 | 64 |
| 1984 | #1,945 | 53 |
| 1983 | #1,927 | 53 |
| 1982 | #2,024 | 51 |
| 1981 | #1,830 | 60 |
| 1980 | #1,605 | 72 |
| 1979 | #1,814 | 59 |
| 1978 | #1,729 | 60 |
| 1977 | #1,952 | 50 |
| 1976 | #1,747 | 54 |
| 1975 | #2,060 | 42 |
| 1974 | #1,667 | 55 |
| 1973 | #1,329 | 76 |
| 1972 | #1,655 | 54 |
| 1971 | #1,415 | 74 |
| 1970 | #1,263 | 87 |
| 1969 | #1,117 | 98 |
| 1968 | #1,244 | 77 |
| 1967 | #1,060 | 96 |
| 1966 | #900 | 125 |
| 1965 | #915 | 121 |
| 1964 | #1,073 | 103 |
| 1963 | #1,022 | 109 |
| 1962 | #998 | 116 |
| 1961 | #879 | 147 |
| 1960 | #897 | 137 |
| 1959 | #883 | 138 |
| 1958 | #717 | 189 |
| 1957 | #871 | 136 |
| 1956 | #858 | 135 |
| 1955 | #844 | 132 |
| 1954 | #827 | 129 |
| 1953 | #777 | 139 |
| 1952 | #800 | 128 |
| 1951 | #938 | 97 |
| 1950 | #876 | 102 |
| 1949 | #856 | 106 |
| 1948 | #939 | 85 |
| 1947 | #1,003 | 78 |
| 1946 | #1,192 | 52 |
| 1945 | #1,874 | 20 |
| 1944 | #2,401 | 14 |
| 1943 | #3,801 | 7 |
| 1942 | #3,738 | 7 |
| 1941 | #3,252 | 8 |
| 1940 | #2,963 | 9 |
| 1939 | #2,592 | 11 |
| 1938 | #2,340 | 13 |
| 1937 | #1,914 | 17 |
| 1936 | #1,950 | 16 |
| 1935 | #2,575 | 11 |
| 1934 | #2,003 | 16 |
| 1933 | #1,906 | 17 |
| 1932 | #2,831 | 10 |
| 1931 | #1,502 | 25 |
| 1930 | #2,425 | 13 |
| 1929 | #3,682 | 7 |
| 1928 | #3,436 | 8 |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | #4,306 | 6 |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | #5,061 | 5 |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | #3,379 | 9 |
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 |
| 1920 | #3,340 | 9 |
| 1919 | #3,817 | 7 |
| 1918 | #3,869 | 7 |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | #3,919 | 6 |
| 1915 | #3,795 | 6 |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | #3,187 | 5 |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,821 | 6 |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Lizabeth! It came in at #1,821, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1908–1914, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Lizabeth is popular in 1953
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Nebraska#302 · 1 in 2,776
- Indiana#390 · 1 in 4,700
- Minnesota#454 · 1 in 7,076
- Wisconsin#455 · 1 in 7,981
- Florida#509 · 1 in 5,955
Best ever in a state: #302 in Nebraska, 1953.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska | #302 | 5 | 1 in 2,776 |
| Indiana | #390 | 10 | 1 in 4,700 |
| Minnesota | #454 | 5 | 1 in 7,076 |
| Wisconsin | #455 | 5 | 1 in 7,981 |
| Florida | #509 | 6 | 1 in 5,955 |
| Louisiana | #605 | 5 | 1 in 7,409 |
| Ohio | #641 | 8 | 1 in 12,053 |
| Pennsylvania | #649 | 8 | 1 in 13,840 |
| New York | #749 | 10 | 1 in 15,384 |
| Michigan | #750 | 5 | 1 in 16,600 |
| California | #792 | 11 | 1 in 12,623 |
| Texas | #842 | 9 | 1 in 12,313 |
| Illinois | #854 | 5 | 1 in 18,887 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lizabeth
- 240 spots since 2024 (#7,251 → #7,491)
- 4,651 spots since 2020 (#12,142 → #7,491)
- 956 spots since 2015 (#8,447 → #7,491)
- Biggest jump: 158 spots in 1965 (#1,073 → #915)
- Biggest drop: 166 spots in 1959 (#717 → #883)
- Debuted 1907
- Peaked 1958 at #717 (189 births)
- Births halved by 1968, 10 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 17 yrs · run 1948–1962
- Highest: 1 in 10,643 girls born in 1958 were named Lizabeth (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 114,805 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 23.6% of all girls named Lizabeth (1,325) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 6 | #1,821 (1907) | #1,821 |
| 1910s | 31 | #3,187 (1913) | #3,717 |
| 1920s | 49 | #3,340 (1920) | #4,043 |
| 1930s | 149 | #1,502 (1931) | #2,204 |
| 1940s | 386 | #856 (1949) | #2,202 |
| 1950s | 1,325 | #717 (1958) | #839 |
| 1960s | 1,129 | #879 (1961) | #1,011 |
| 1970s | 611 | #1,263 (1970) | #1,663 |
| 1980s | 595 | #1,605 (1980) | #1,890 |
| 1990s | 562 | #1,882 (1993) | #2,407 |
| 2000s | 460 | #2,368 (2003) | #3,525 |
| 2010s | 249 | #4,244 (2011) | #5,724 |
| 2020s | 67 | #7,250 (2021) | #9,731 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lizabeth in 1953
Top girls' names in 1953
More about 1953
girls
1,881,301 girls got a published name in 1953; 1 in 13,535 of them was named Lizabeth, which outranked 88.0% of the 6,497 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).