Lizbeth
- #1,299 for girls in 2025, 171 births
- Last seen for boys in 2004 at #9,948
- Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2002 · 2,569 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 25,918since 1924
Lizbeth over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Lizbeth has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,299 | 171 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,117 | 218 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,253 | 184 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,073 | 234 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,135 | 217 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,138 | 209 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,045 | 245 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,097 | 226 | — | |
| 2017 | #921 | 289 | — | |
| 2016 | #928 | 297 | — | |
| 2015 | #837 | 335 | — | |
| 2014 | #754 | 372 | — | |
| 2013 | #705 | 396 | — | |
| 2012 | #609 | 470 | — | |
| 2011 | #543 | 536 | — | |
| 2010 | #501 | 594 | — | |
| 2009 | #383 | 835 | — | |
| 2008 | #374 | 882 | — | |
| 2007 | #298 | 1,133 | — | |
| 2006 | #323 | 1,019 | — | |
| 2005 | #277 | 1,193 | — | |
| 2004 | #232 | 1,422 | #9,948 | 6 |
| 2003 | #146 | 2,275 | #7,831 | 8 |
| 2002 | #133 | 2,569 | #6,088 | 11 |
| 2001 | #373 | 795 | — | |
| 2000 | #364 | 817 | — | |
| 1999 | #325 | 944 | — | |
| 1998 | #419 | 633 | — | |
| 1997 | #525 | 454 | — | |
| 1996 | #524 | 451 | — | |
| 1995 | #497 | 494 | — | |
| 1994 | #525 | 472 | — | |
| 1993 | #579 | 406 | — | |
| 1992 | #560 | 420 | #7,422 | 6 |
| 1991 | #641 | 347 | — | |
| 1990 | #623 | 358 | — | |
| 1989 | #778 | 249 | — | |
| 1988 | #934 | 181 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,025 | 151 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,097 | 135 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,382 | 93 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,490 | 77 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,346 | 89 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,489 | 80 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,261 | 102 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,408 | 88 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,530 | 76 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,614 | 66 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,774 | 57 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,135 | 40 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,689 | 56 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,961 | 43 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,788 | 48 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,989 | 40 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,247 | 35 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,755 | 51 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,685 | 51 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,812 | 43 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,079 | 32 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,715 | 43 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,655 | 46 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,747 | 44 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,580 | 51 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,708 | 44 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,666 | 46 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,542 | 52 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,299 | 68 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,240 | 73 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,322 | 64 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,312 | 63 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,175 | 72 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,229 | 65 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,318 | 54 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,195 | 63 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,277 | 53 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,224 | 57 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,512 | 37 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,345 | 47 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,633 | 34 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,723 | 27 | — | |
| 1945 | #3,132 | 9 | — | |
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 | — | |
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | #4,434 | 6 | — | |
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1924
The first year at least five girls were named Lizbeth! It came in at #4,434, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1925–1944, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Lizbeth is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- California#575 · 1 in 2,888
- Pennsylvania#1,015 · 1 in 5,836
- New York#1,087 · 1 in 6,025
- Texas#1,117 · 1 in 6,689
- Georgia#1,213 · 1 in 6,458
Best ever in a state: #35 in Nevada, 2002.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #575 | 56 | 1 in 2,888 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,015 | 8 | 1 in 5,836 |
| New York | #1,087 | 13 | 1 in 6,025 |
| Texas | #1,117 | 24 | 1 in 6,689 |
| Georgia | #1,213 | 7 | 1 in 6,458 |
| Illinois | #1,240 | 6 | 1 in 7,388 |
| Florida | #1,325 | 10 | 1 in 8,676 |
| North Carolina | #1,437 | 5 | 1 in 9,297 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lizbeth
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 161 spots since 2020 (#1,138 → #1,299)
- Biggest jump: 240 spots in 2002
- Biggest drop: 176 spots in 2018
Rise & fade · girls
78 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1924
- Peaked 2002 at #133 (2,569 births)
- Births halved by 2005, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 30 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 30 yrs · run 1988–2017
Share of babies · girls
1 in 699
- Highest: 1 in 699 girls born in 2002 were named Lizbeth (0.14%)
- Latest: 1 in 9,399 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 49.9% of all girls named Lizbeth (12,940) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 6 | #4,434 (1924) | #4,434 |
| 1930s | 0 | — | — |
| 1940s | 159 | #1,345 (1948) | #2,328 |
| 1950s | 632 | #1,175 (1955) | #1,259 |
| 1960s | 452 | #1,542 (1960) | #1,719 |
| 1970s | 512 | #1,530 (1979) | #1,848 |
| 1980s | 1,245 | #778 (1989) | #1,221 |
| 1990s | 4,979 | #325 (1999) | #522 |
| 2000s | 12,940 | #133 (2002) | #290 |
| 2010s | 3,760 | #501 (2010) | #794 |
| 2020s | 1,233 | #1,073 (2022) | #1,169 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Lizbeth ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: