Lizeth
#2,173 for girls in 2025, 85 births · Last seen for boys in 1990 at #5,382
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1999 · 426 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 9,168since 1971
Lizeth over time
Rank among girls' names. Lizeth has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,173 | 85 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,719 | 118 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,774 | 115 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,856 | 109 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,750 | 117 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,545 | 137 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,560 | 138 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,762 | 116 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,721 | 123 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,446 | 159 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,566 | 140 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,352 | 173 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,336 | 175 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,188 | 207 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,164 | 210 | — | |
| 2010 | #902 | 292 | — | |
| 2009 | #958 | 279 | — | |
| 2008 | #828 | 343 | — | |
| 2007 | #861 | 326 | — | |
| 2006 | #700 | 405 | — | |
| 2005 | #671 | 415 | — | |
| 2004 | #626 | 435 | — | |
| 2003 | #715 | 362 | — | |
| 2002 | #686 | 365 | — | |
| 2001 | #820 | 283 | — | |
| 2000 | #676 | 357 | — | |
| 1999 | #581 | 426 | — | |
| 1998 | #968 | 211 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,139 | 164 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,049 | 176 | — | |
| 1995 | #953 | 197 | — | |
| 1994 | #961 | 193 | — | |
| 1993 | #916 | 209 | — | |
| 1992 | #955 | 201 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,090 | 165 | — | |
| 1990 | #971 | 192 | #5,382 | 9 |
| 1989 | #977 | 178 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,345 | 106 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,647 | 74 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,367 | 94 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,621 | 73 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,751 | 62 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,770 | 60 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,115 | 48 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,641 | 70 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,528 | 77 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,770 | 61 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,269 | 40 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,463 | 35 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,287 | 21 | — | |
| 1975 | #5,161 | 11 | — | |
| 1974 | #5,360 | 10 | — | |
| 1973 | #4,155 | 14 | — | |
| 1972 | #5,480 | 9 | — | |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | — | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Lizeth! It came in at #6,619, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1971–1972, when fewer than 10 girls a year got the name.
Where Lizeth is popular in 2010
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#455 · 1 in 2,398
- Arizona#470 · 1 in 2,105
- Texas#540 · 1 in 2,752
- Utah#634 · 1 in 3,027
- Colorado#677 · 1 in 3,265
Best ever in a state: #147 in Nevada, 1999.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #455 | 88 | 1 in 2,398 |
| Arizona | #470 | 15 | 1 in 2,105 |
| Texas | #540 | 58 | 1 in 2,752 |
| Utah | #634 | 6 | 1 in 3,027 |
| Colorado | #677 | 7 | 1 in 3,265 |
| Georgia | #825 | 11 | 1 in 4,361 |
| Illinois | #829 | 13 | 1 in 4,678 |
| New Jersey | #832 | 8 | 1 in 4,653 |
| Washington | #930 | 6 | 1 in 5,054 |
| North Carolina | #971 | 8 | 1 in 5,618 |
| Indiana | #1,043 | 5 | 1 in 6,063 |
| New York | #1,273 | 11 | 1 in 8,459 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lizeth
- 454 spots since 2024 (#1,719 → #2,173)
- 628 spots since 2020 (#1,545 → #2,173)
- 607 spots since 2015 (#1,566 → #2,173)
- Biggest jump: 387 spots in 1999 (#968 → #581)
- Biggest drop: 262 spots in 2011 (#902 → #1,164)
- Debuted 1971
- Peaked 1999 at #581 (426 births)
- Births halved by 2011, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 19 yrs · run 1998–2010
- Highest: 1 in 4,164 girls born in 1999 were named Lizeth (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 18,909 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 38.9% of all girls named Lizeth (3,570) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 208 | #1,770 (1979) | #4,063 |
| 1980s | 842 | #977 (1989) | #1,576 |
| 1990s | 2,134 | #581 (1999) | #958 |
| 2000s | 3,570 | #626 (2004) | #754 |
| 2010s | 1,733 | #902 (2010) | #1,400 |
| 2020s | 681 | #1,545 (2020) | #1,803 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lizeth in 2010
Top girls' names in 2010
More about 2010
girls
1,777,595 girls got a published name in 2010; 1 in 6,088 of them was named Lizeth, which outranked 95.5% of the 19,841 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.