Lloyd
Last seen for girls in 1987 at #7,987 · #1,547 for boys in 2025, 111 births
Given to boys 99.4% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1918 · 3,742 births
- Debut · boys
- 104 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 55 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 160,990since 1880
Lloyd over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,547 | 111 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,767 | 93 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,787 | 90 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,706 | 99 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,546 | 113 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,716 | 90 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,614 | 102 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,458 | 119 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,554 | 105 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,520 | 111 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,502 | 110 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,402 | 120 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,277 | 136 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,328 | 128 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,198 | 147 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,331 | 128 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,324 | 131 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,119 | 163 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,162 | 152 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,085 | 162 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,139 | 142 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,152 | 136 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,134 | 133 | |
| 2002 | — | #994 | 158 | |
| 2001 | — | #902 | 174 | |
| 2000 | — | #921 | 167 | |
| 1999 | — | #816 | 187 | |
| 1998 | — | #878 | 165 | |
| 1997 | — | #701 | 227 | |
| 1996 | — | #730 | 210 | |
| 1995 | — | #654 | 254 | |
| 1994 | — | #615 | 290 | |
| 1993 | — | #609 | 290 | |
| 1992 | — | #549 | 343 | |
| 1991 | — | #549 | 342 | |
| 1990 | — | #491 | 391 | |
| 1989 | — | #471 | 404 | |
| 1988 | — | #461 | 389 | |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | #429 | 419 |
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | #425 | 410 |
| 1985 | — | #402 | 448 | |
| 1984 | #8,153 | 7 | #394 | 432 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #371 | 473 |
| 1982 | — | #356 | 504 | |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | #332 | 559 |
| 1980 | #5,912 | 11 | #335 | 560 |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | #329 | 552 |
| 1978 | — | #338 | 518 | |
| 1977 | — | #329 | 559 | |
| 1976 | #7,296 | 7 | #327 | 534 |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | #300 | 635 |
| 1974 | — | #292 | 631 | |
| 1973 | #7,435 | 6 | #269 | 695 |
| 1972 | — | #262 | 751 | |
| 1971 | — | #242 | 948 | |
| 1970 | — | #238 | 990 | |
| 1969 | #5,456 | 8 | #236 | 967 |
| 1968 | #5,147 | 8 | #225 | 1,004 |
| 1967 | #4,625 | 9 | #208 | 1,081 |
| 1966 | #4,493 | 9 | #208 | 1,115 |
| 1965 | — | #195 | 1,295 | |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | #194 | 1,460 |
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | #193 | 1,547 |
| 1962 | #4,865 | 8 | #195 | 1,543 |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #182 | 1,685 |
| 1960 | #6,390 | 5 | #180 | 1,733 |
| 1959 | #4,031 | 10 | #167 | 1,872 |
| 1958 | #4,193 | 9 | #166 | 1,838 |
| 1957 | #4,202 | 9 | #164 | 1,921 |
| 1956 | #3,321 | 13 | #158 | 1,980 |
| 1955 | #3,571 | 11 | #147 | 2,030 |
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 | #142 | 2,114 |
| 1953 | #4,595 | 7 | #138 | 2,169 |
| 1952 | #4,123 | 8 | #130 | 2,277 |
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 | #124 | 2,298 |
| 1950 | #3,423 | 10 | #127 | 2,120 |
| 1949 | #2,410 | 17 | #124 | 2,330 |
| 1948 | #3,593 | 9 | #118 | 2,391 |
| 1947 | #4,345 | 7 | #112 | 2,630 |
| 1946 | #2,482 | 15 | #106 | 2,496 |
| 1945 | #3,388 | 8 | #103 | 2,221 |
| 1944 | #2,762 | 11 | #102 | 2,311 |
| 1943 | #2,251 | 16 | #104 | 2,443 |
| 1942 | #2,666 | 12 | #96 | 2,462 |
| 1941 | #2,272 | 14 | #96 | 2,252 |
| 1940 | #2,572 | 11 | #100 | 2,067 |
| 1939 | #2,736 | 10 | #95 | 2,087 |
| 1938 | #2,730 | 10 | #92 | 2,215 |
| 1937 | #1,784 | 19 | #91 | 2,157 |
| 1936 | #1,950 | 16 | #88 | 2,160 |
| 1935 | #1,606 | 22 | #84 | 2,296 |
| 1934 | #1,651 | 21 | #82 | 2,339 |
| 1933 | #1,658 | 21 | #73 | 2,413 |
| 1932 | #1,520 | 25 | #71 | 2,590 |
| 1931 | #1,635 | 22 | #67 | 2,704 |
| 1930 | #1,232 | 37 | #69 | 2,838 |
| 1929 | #1,555 | 25 | #62 | 2,949 |
| 1928 | #1,366 | 32 | #59 | 3,158 |
| 1927 | #1,828 | 22 | #58 | 3,325 |
| 1926 | #1,514 | 29 | #60 | 3,278 |
| 1925 | #1,466 | 31 | #62 | 3,324 |
| 1924 | #1,770 | 24 | #61 | 3,350 |
| 1923 | #1,556 | 28 | #59 | 3,387 |
| 1922 | #1,682 | 25 | #59 | 3,364 |
| 1921 | #2,195 | 17 | #58 | 3,536 |
| 1920 | #1,816 | 22 | #58 | 3,454 |
| 1919 | #1,393 | 31 | #58 | 3,238 |
| 1918 | #1,690 | 23 | #51 | 3,742 |
| 1917 | #1,923 | 18 | #53 | 3,417 |
| 1916 | #1,485 | 25 | #58 | 2,926 |
| 1915 | #1,439 | 25 | #62 | 2,653 |
| 1914 | #1,896 | 13 | #66 | 1,884 |
| 1913 | #1,670 | 13 | #67 | 1,521 |
| 1912 | #1,719 | 11 | #70 | 1,227 |
| 1911 | #1,545 | 10 | #74 | 590 |
| 1910 | #2,140 | 6 | #67 | 545 |
| 1909 | #1,763 | 7 | #76 | 412 |
| 1908 | — | #73 | 394 | |
| 1907 | — | #71 | 386 | |
| 1906 | #1,416 | 8 | #70 | 357 |
| 1905 | — | #69 | 369 | |
| 1904 | — | #73 | 324 | |
| 1903 | #1,592 | 6 | #72 | 299 |
| 1902 | — | #67 | 344 | |
| 1901 | — | #68 | 285 | |
| 1900 | — | #78 | 337 | |
| 1899 | — | #68 | 287 | |
| 1898 | — | #79 | 265 | |
| 1897 | — | #74 | 258 | |
| 1896 | — | #67 | 308 | |
| 1895 | — | #75 | 263 | |
| 1894 | — | #80 | 253 | |
| 1893 | — | #88 | 211 | |
| 1892 | — | #76 | 268 | |
| 1891 | — | #88 | 185 | |
| 1890 | — | #94 | 182 | |
| 1889 | — | #98 | 167 | |
| 1888 | — | #99 | 175 | |
| 1887 | — | #108 | 127 | |
| 1886 | — | #107 | 144 | |
| 1885 | — | #126 | 109 | |
| 1884 | — | #119 | 122 | |
| 1883 | — | #126 | 98 | |
| 1882 | — | #120 | 121 | |
| 1881 | — | #142 | 87 | |
| 1880 | — | #123 | 104 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lloyd was already there! It came in at #123, and was given to 104 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1885, when fewer than 130 boys a year got the name.
Where Lloyd is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Dakota#22 · 1 in 93
- Nebraska#23 · 1 in 103
- North Dakota#25 · 1 in 97
- Minnesota#28 · 1 in 106
- Oregon#35 · 1 in 127
Best ever in a state: #12 in North Dakota, 1928.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | #22 | 55 | 1 in 93 |
| Nebraska | #23 | 101 | 1 in 103 |
| North Dakota | #25 | 69 | 1 in 97 |
| Minnesota | #28 | 178 | 1 in 106 |
| Iowa | #35 | 135 | 1 in 134 |
| Kansas | #35 | 98 | 1 in 135 |
| Oregon | #35 | 35 | 1 in 127 |
| Utah | #35 | 29 | 1 in 136 |
| Colorado | #37 | 40 | 1 in 155 |
| Montana | #37 | 31 | 1 in 153 |
| Oklahoma | #37 | 104 | 1 in 150 |
| Missouri | #42 | 133 | 1 in 185 |
| California | #43 | 91 | 1 in 197 |
| Idaho | #44 | 21 | 1 in 154 |
| Indiana | #44 | 102 | 1 in 200 |
| Washington | #46 | 40 | 1 in 187 |
| Arizona | #50 | 13 | 1 in 188 |
| Louisiana | #50 | 63 | 1 in 235 |
| Wisconsin | #50 | 119 | 1 in 169 |
| Maine | #51 | 26 | 1 in 182 |
| Michigan | #51 | 122 | 1 in 226 |
| New Hampshire | #53 | 13 | 1 in 199 |
| Virginia | #55 | 66 | 1 in 280 |
| Wyoming | #56 | 5 | 1 in 205 |
| Ohio | #59 | 145 | 1 in 280 |
| Illinois | #60 | 166 | 1 in 299 |
| Arkansas | #61 | 52 | 1 in 263 |
| District of Columbia | #66 | 6 | 1 in 338 |
| Vermont | #67 | 8 | 1 in 257 |
| Maryland | #69 | 30 | 1 in 341 |
| West Virginia | #69 | 35 | 1 in 319 |
| Pennsylvania | #71 | 182 | 1 in 403 |
| Texas | #72 | 112 | 1 in 342 |
| Florida | #74 | 21 | 1 in 358 |
| Kentucky | #78 | 50 | 1 in 394 |
| North Carolina | #80 | 57 | 1 in 441 |
| Tennessee | #88 | 37 | 1 in 505 |
| Connecticut | #92 | 17 | 1 in 677 |
| Alabama | #97 | 41 | 1 in 516 |
| New Mexico | #97 | 7 | 1 in 389 |
| Massachusetts | #101 | 37 | 1 in 786 |
| Rhode Island | #101 | 7 | 1 in 588 |
| New York | #103 | 109 | 1 in 736 |
| Georgia | #110 | 43 | 1 in 607 |
| South Carolina | #120 | 24 | 1 in 698 |
| Mississippi | #124 | 26 | 1 in 623 |
| New Jersey | #143 | 18 | 1 in 1,347 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lloyd
- 220 spots since 2024 (#1,767 → #1,547)
- 169 spots since 2020 (#1,716 → #1,547)
- 45 spots since 2015 (#1,502 → #1,547)
- Biggest jump: 62 spots in 1999 (#878 → #816)
- Biggest drop: 177 spots in 1998 (#701 → #878)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1918 at #51 (3,742 births)
- Births halved by 1958, 40 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 55 yrs · run 1888–1942
- Top 1,000: 123 yrs · run 1880–2002
- Highest: 1 in 271 boys born in 1918 were named Lloyd (0.37%)
- Latest: 1 in 15,388 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 20.6% of all boys named Lloyd (33,125) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,254 | #98 (1889) | #117 |
| 1890s | 2,480 | #67 (1896) | #79 |
| 1900s | 3,507 | #67 (1902) | #72 |
| 1910s | 21,743 | #51 (1918) | #63 |
| 1920s | 33,125 | #58 (1921) | #60 |
| 1930s | 23,799 | #67 (1931) | #81 |
| 1940s | 23,603 | #96 (1942) | #106 |
| 1950s | 20,619 | #124 (1951) | #146 |
| 1960s | 13,430 | #180 (1960) | #202 |
| 1970s | 6,813 | #238 (1970) | #293 |
| 1980s | 4,598 | #332 (1981) | #398 |
| 1990s | 2,699 | #491 (1990) | #659 |
| 2000s | 1,518 | #902 (2001) | #1,093 |
| 2010s | 1,206 | #1,198 (2011) | #1,418 |
| 2020s | 596 | #1,546 (2021) | #1,678 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lloyd in 1916
Top girls' names in 1916
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 41,773 of them was named Lloyd, which outranked 71.2% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,445Vieno26
- #1,445Virgina26
- #1,445Wenonah26
- #1,485Lloyd25
- #1,485Aili25
- #1,485Albena25
- #1,485Angelica25
- #1,533Adel24
- #1,533Adelyn24
- #1,533Alleen24
Tied with 47 names at #1,485; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 304 of them was named Lloyd, which outranked 98.7% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.