Logan
#402 for girls in 2025, 775 births · #53 for boys in 2025, 5,576 births
Given to boys 92.4% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2017 · 14,061 births
- Debut · boys
- 13 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 35 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 387,999since 1880
Logan over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #402 | 775 | #53 | 5,576 |
| 2024 | #390 | 808 | #45 | 6,297 |
| 2023 | #356 | 858 | #39 | 6,706 |
| 2022 | #372 | 848 | #33 | 7,614 |
| 2021 | #313 | 1,035 | #21 | 8,836 |
| 2020 | #317 | 1,001 | #16 | 9,163 |
| 2019 | #322 | 996 | #16 | 10,571 |
| 2018 | #310 | 1,078 | #10 | 12,447 |
| 2017 | #292 | 1,106 | #5 | 14,061 |
| 2016 | #384 | 855 | #18 | 11,278 |
| 2015 | #393 | 835 | #14 | 12,939 |
| 2014 | #392 | 832 | #13 | 13,669 |
| 2013 | #431 | 707 | #18 | 12,366 |
| 2012 | #455 | 683 | #22 | 12,488 |
| 2011 | #526 | 551 | #21 | 12,999 |
| 2010 | #487 | 620 | #17 | 14,032 |
| 2009 | #455 | 684 | #17 | 14,467 |
| 2008 | #431 | 736 | #19 | 13,861 |
| 2007 | #455 | 708 | #17 | 15,331 |
| 2006 | #433 | 737 | #20 | 15,151 |
| 2005 | #410 | 759 | #26 | 13,475 |
| 2004 | #352 | 900 | #27 | 13,140 |
| 2003 | #351 | 885 | #28 | 13,187 |
| 2002 | #330 | 921 | #29 | 12,974 |
| 2001 | #305 | 1,042 | #29 | 12,710 |
| 2000 | #318 | 999 | #40 | 9,737 |
| 1999 | #289 | 1,073 | #42 | 9,136 |
| 1998 | #293 | 1,026 | #44 | 8,640 |
| 1997 | #275 | 1,067 | #42 | 8,620 |
| 1996 | #257 | 1,097 | #42 | 8,374 |
| 1995 | #264 | 1,041 | #51 | 6,953 |
| 1994 | #311 | 879 | #70 | 5,458 |
| 1993 | #333 | 790 | #76 | 4,844 |
| 1992 | #440 | 571 | #89 | 4,226 |
| 1991 | #476 | 512 | #94 | 3,893 |
| 1990 | #612 | 368 | #104 | 3,433 |
| 1989 | #622 | 341 | #104 | 3,281 |
| 1988 | #762 | 245 | #109 | 2,758 |
| 1987 | #1,109 | 135 | #144 | 1,951 |
| 1986 | #1,113 | 132 | #192 | 1,329 |
| 1985 | #1,410 | 90 | #233 | 995 |
| 1984 | #1,332 | 91 | #227 | 988 |
| 1983 | #1,358 | 88 | #265 | 780 |
| 1982 | #1,436 | 84 | #294 | 689 |
| 1981 | #1,423 | 86 | #290 | 693 |
| 1980 | #1,886 | 57 | #348 | 519 |
| 1979 | #2,112 | 47 | #370 | 468 |
| 1978 | #3,924 | 18 | #454 | 307 |
| 1977 | #5,213 | 12 | #592 | 203 |
| 1976 | #5,601 | 10 | #781 | 113 |
| 1975 | #6,484 | 8 | #894 | 85 |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | #969 | 71 |
| 1973 | — | #978 | 68 | |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #1,040 | 60 |
| 1971 | — | #1,101 | 55 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,103 | 55 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,110 | 49 | |
| 1968 | — | #958 | 58 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,003 | 52 | |
| 1966 | — | #941 | 59 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,064 | 48 | |
| 1964 | — | #936 | 66 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,138 | 46 | |
| 1962 | — | #984 | 60 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,108 | 50 | |
| 1960 | — | #996 | 59 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,050 | 54 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,114 | 47 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,165 | 44 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,140 | 44 | |
| 1955 | — | #921 | 65 | |
| 1954 | — | #963 | 59 | |
| 1953 | — | #939 | 58 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,002 | 51 | |
| 1951 | — | #892 | 62 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,006 | 48 | |
| 1949 | — | #946 | 53 | |
| 1948 | — | #923 | 56 | |
| 1947 | — | #906 | 59 | |
| 1946 | — | #944 | 50 | |
| 1945 | — | #916 | 49 | |
| 1944 | — | #918 | 48 | |
| 1943 | — | #908 | 54 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,119 | 37 | |
| 1941 | — | #951 | 45 | |
| 1940 | — | #841 | 56 | |
| 1939 | — | #931 | 45 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,043 | 38 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,031 | 38 | |
| 1936 | — | #949 | 42 | |
| 1935 | — | #969 | 43 | |
| 1934 | — | #779 | 63 | |
| 1933 | — | #788 | 60 | |
| 1932 | — | #786 | 65 | |
| 1931 | — | #997 | 44 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,037 | 44 | |
| 1929 | — | #771 | 69 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,003 | 47 | |
| 1927 | — | #825 | 65 | |
| 1926 | — | #944 | 52 | |
| 1925 | — | #723 | 80 | |
| 1924 | — | #710 | 86 | |
| 1923 | — | #873 | 61 | |
| 1922 | — | #780 | 73 | |
| 1921 | — | #698 | 86 | |
| 1920 | — | #766 | 74 | |
| 1919 | — | #690 | 81 | |
| 1918 | — | #674 | 85 | |
| 1917 | — | #612 | 94 | |
| 1916 | — | #662 | 79 | |
| 1915 | — | #823 | 55 | |
| 1914 | — | #629 | 65 | |
| 1913 | — | #759 | 38 | |
| 1912 | — | #725 | 35 | |
| 1911 | — | #793 | 17 | |
| 1910 | — | #729 | 17 | |
| 1909 | — | #636 | 18 | |
| 1908 | — | #779 | 12 | |
| 1907 | — | #999 | 8 | |
| 1906 | — | #752 | 11 | |
| 1905 | — | #525 | 19 | |
| 1904 | — | #647 | 13 | |
| 1903 | — | #656 | 12 | |
| 1902 | — | #615 | 13 | |
| 1901 | — | #779 | 8 | |
| 1900 | — | #490 | 22 | |
| 1899 | — | #661 | 10 | |
| 1898 | — | #485 | 18 | |
| 1897 | — | #495 | 16 | |
| 1896 | — | #534 | 15 | |
| 1895 | — | #529 | 15 | |
| 1894 | — | #502 | 16 | |
| 1893 | — | #479 | 15 | |
| 1892 | — | #547 | 14 | |
| 1891 | — | #456 | 15 | |
| 1890 | — | #489 | 15 | |
| 1889 | — | #305 | 32 | |
| 1888 | — | #442 | 18 | |
| 1887 | — | #307 | 29 | |
| 1886 | — | #311 | 30 | |
| 1885 | — | #298 | 32 | |
| 1884 | — | #207 | 63 | |
| 1883 | — | #381 | 20 | |
| 1882 | — | #437 | 17 | |
| 1881 | — | #487 | 13 | |
| 1880 | — | #505 | 13 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Logan was already there! It came in at #505, and was given to 13 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1901, when fewer than 9 boys a year got the name.
Where Logan is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Hampshire#1 · 1 in 50
- North Dakota#1 · 1 in 55
- Minnesota#1 · 1 in 75
- Idaho#1 · 1 in 78
- Maine#2 · 1 in 57
Best ever in a state: #1 in North Dakota, 2006.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho | #1 | 113 | 1 in 78 |
| Minnesota | #1 | 390 | 1 in 75 |
| New Hampshire | #1 | 102 | 1 in 50 |
| North Dakota | #1 | 60 | 1 in 55 |
| Maine | #2 | 89 | 1 in 57 |
| Oregon | #2 | 206 | 1 in 94 |
| Alaska | #3 | 49 | 1 in 71 |
| Michigan | #3 | 549 | 1 in 90 |
| Montana | #3 | 53 | 1 in 75 |
| Rhode Island | #3 | 77 | 1 in 55 |
| South Dakota | #3 | 55 | 1 in 75 |
| Indiana | #4 | 401 | 1 in 93 |
| Ohio | #4 | 726 | 1 in 86 |
| Pennsylvania | #4 | 728 | 1 in 85 |
| Vermont | #4 | 37 | 1 in 52 |
| Wisconsin | #4 | 363 | 1 in 79 |
| Colorado | #6 | 280 | 1 in 103 |
| Missouri | #6 | 363 | 1 in 92 |
| Washington | #6 | 351 | 1 in 105 |
| West Virginia | #6 | 123 | 1 in 70 |
| Nebraska | #7 | 118 | 1 in 88 |
| Wyoming | #7 | 29 | 1 in 71 |
| Delaware | #8 | 54 | 1 in 70 |
| Iowa | #8 | 167 | 1 in 95 |
| Kansas | #9 | 154 | 1 in 109 |
| Oklahoma | #10 | 184 | 1 in 117 |
| Utah | #10 | 193 | 1 in 119 |
| Kentucky | #11 | 247 | 1 in 95 |
| Nevada | #12 | 143 | 1 in 100 |
| Florida | #16 | 832 | 1 in 115 |
| Arizona | #18 | 333 | 1 in 120 |
| Arkansas | #18 | 129 | 1 in 116 |
| Illinois | #19 | 579 | 1 in 125 |
| Louisiana | #19 | 181 | 1 in 138 |
| Tennessee | #21 | 286 | 1 in 127 |
| Virginia | #21 | 368 | 1 in 115 |
| Hawaii | #22 | 41 | 1 in 112 |
| Maryland | #22 | 243 | 1 in 118 |
| South Carolina | #22 | 173 | 1 in 125 |
| Alabama | #25 | 180 | 1 in 134 |
| Connecticut | #26 | 135 | 1 in 113 |
| North Carolina | #27 | 385 | 1 in 140 |
| Massachusetts | #29 | 270 | 1 in 115 |
| New Jersey | #31 | 316 | 1 in 141 |
| New Mexico | #31 | 76 | 1 in 139 |
| New York | #31 | 709 | 1 in 152 |
| Georgia | #33 | 350 | 1 in 169 |
| Mississippi | #38 | 85 | 1 in 175 |
| California | #39 | 1,378 | 1 in 176 |
| Texas | #42 | 1,001 | 1 in 186 |
| District of Columbia | #107 | 13 | 1 in 327 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Logan
- 8 spots since 2024 (#45 → #53)
- 37 spots since 2020 (#16 → #53)
- 39 spots since 2015 (#14 → #53)
- Biggest jump: 232 spots in 1929 (#1,003 → #771)
- Biggest drop: 289 spots in 1901 (#490 → #779)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2017 at #5 (14,061 births)
- Births halved by 2023, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: 2 yrs · run 2017–2018
- Top 100: 35 yrs · run 1991–2025
- Top 1,000: 127 yrs · run 1973–2025
- Highest: 1 in 132 boys born in 2017 were named Logan (0.76%)
- Latest: 1 in 306 boys born in 2025 (0.33%)
- 34.5% of all boys named Logan (134,033) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #207 (1884) → #1,165 (1957) → #5 (2017)
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 267 | #207 (1884) | #368 |
| 1890s | 149 | #456 (1891) | #518 |
| 1900s | 136 | #490 (1900) | #688 |
| 1910s | 566 | #612 (1917) | #710 |
| 1920s | 693 | #698 (1921) | #809 |
| 1930s | 482 | #779 (1934) | #931 |
| 1940s | 507 | #841 (1940) | #937 |
| 1950s | 532 | #892 (1951) | #1,019 |
| 1960s | 547 | #936 (1964) | #1,024 |
| 1970s | 1,485 | #370 (1979) | #828 |
| 1980s | 13,983 | #104 (1989) | #221 |
| 1990s | 63,577 | #42 (1999) | #65 |
| 2000s | 134,033 | #17 (2007) | #25 |
| 2010s | 126,850 | #5 (2017) | #15 |
| 2020s | 44,192 | #16 (2020) | #35 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Logan in 2009
Top girls' names in 2009
Top boys' names in 2009
More about 2009
girls
1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 2,686 of them was named Logan, which outranked 97.7% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 137 of them was named Logan, which outranked 99.9% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.