Loma
Last seen for girls in 2023 at #15,194 · Last seen for boys in 1935 at #3,645
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1882 · 10 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,289since 1880
Loma over time
Rank among girls' names. Loma has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | #15,194 | 5 | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 | — | |
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | — | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,456 | 8 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,222 | 11 | — | |
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | — | |
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | — | |
| 1964 | #3,692 | 13 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,960 | 18 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,782 | 12 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,318 | 15 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,512 | 13 | — | |
| 1959 | #4,300 | 9 | — | |
| 1958 | #3,232 | 14 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,696 | 11 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,826 | 17 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,635 | 18 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,378 | 21 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,173 | 23 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,327 | 20 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,016 | 24 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,835 | 27 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,767 | 29 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,648 | 32 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,602 | 35 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,723 | 27 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,450 | 31 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,486 | 30 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,423 | 34 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,367 | 35 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,610 | 24 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,272 | 34 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,308 | 32 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,159 | 39 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,735 | 20 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,375 | 28 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,331 | 30 | #3,645 | 5 |
| 1934 | #1,372 | 28 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,179 | 36 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,634 | 22 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,043 | 45 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,232 | 37 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,159 | 41 | — | |
| 1928 | #994 | 56 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,161 | 44 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,115 | 46 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,296 | 37 | — | |
| 1924 | #941 | 65 | — | |
| 1923 | #953 | 60 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,030 | 53 | — | |
| 1921 | #857 | 74 | — | |
| 1920 | #980 | 56 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,057 | 47 | — | |
| 1918 | #921 | 60 | — | |
| 1917 | #879 | 62 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,127 | 39 | — | |
| 1915 | #874 | 56 | — | |
| 1914 | #888 | 43 | — | |
| 1913 | #782 | 45 | — | |
| 1912 | #795 | 39 | — | |
| 1911 | #875 | 24 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,110 | 16 | — | |
| 1909 | #845 | 23 | — | |
| 1908 | #849 | 21 | — | |
| 1907 | #840 | 20 | — | |
| 1906 | #742 | 24 | — | |
| 1905 | #713 | 25 | — | |
| 1904 | #853 | 18 | — | |
| 1903 | #760 | 20 | — | |
| 1902 | #773 | 20 | — | |
| 1901 | #645 | 24 | — | |
| 1900 | #725 | 25 | — | |
| 1899 | #835 | 15 | — | |
| 1898 | #790 | 18 | — | |
| 1897 | #895 | 13 | — | |
| 1896 | #790 | 17 | — | |
| 1895 | #986 | 11 | — | |
| 1894 | #812 | 14 | — | |
| 1893 | #865 | 12 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,017 | 9 | — | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | — | |
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | #937 | 7 | — | |
| 1886 | #993 | 6 | — | |
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | #930 | 6 | — | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | #596 | 10 | — | |
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | — | |
| 1880 | #679 | 7 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Loma was already there! It came in at #679, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1883, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Loma is popular in 1918
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Nebraska#316 · 1 in 2,513
- Ohio#520 · 1 in 9,086
- Texas#589 · 1 in 4,953
Best ever in a state: #313 in South Carolina, 1915.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska | #316 | 5 | 1 in 2,513 |
| Ohio | #520 | 6 | 1 in 9,086 |
| Texas | #589 | 10 | 1 in 4,953 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Loma
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2023
- Biggest jump: 248 spots in 1917 (#1,127 → #879)
- Biggest drop: 355 spots in 1925 (#941 → #1,296)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1882 at #596 (10 births)
- Births halved by 1883, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 35 yrs · run 1893–1909
- Highest: 1 in 9,973 girls born in 1901 were named Loma (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 320,916 girls born in 2023 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #596 in 1882, was only 1 in 10,785 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 23.2% of all girls named Loma (532) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 41 | #596 (1882) | #828 |
| 1890s | 114 | #790 (1898) | #925 |
| 1900s | 220 | #645 (1901) | #775 |
| 1910s | 431 | #782 (1913) | #931 |
| 1920s | 532 | #857 (1921) | #1,049 |
| 1930s | 317 | #1,043 (1931) | #1,337 |
| 1940s | 311 | #1,272 (1940) | #1,535 |
| 1950s | 184 | #1,835 (1950) | #2,742 |
| 1960s | 113 | #2,960 (1963) | #4,297 |
| 1970s | 11 | #7,070 (1970) | #7,681 |
| 1980s | 10 | #10,411 (1981) | #10,544 |
| 1990s | 0 | — | — |
| 2000s | 0 | — | — |
| 2010s | 0 | — | — |
| 2020s | 5 | #15,194 (2023) | #15,194 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Loma in 1918
Top girls' names in 1918
More about 1918
girls
1,157,631 girls got a published name in 1918; 1 in 19,294 of them was named Loma, which outranked 83.5% of the 5,585 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #915Fae61
- #915Gaynell61
- #915Mafalda61
- #921Loma60
- #921Christene60
- #921Domenica60
- #921Juliana60
- #930Adelina59
- #930Ellamae59
- #930Lavera59
Tied with 8 names at #921; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↑ 547Jesse#1,507 → #960
- ↑ 494Liberty#1,079 → #585
- ↑ 389Marilynn#1,337 → #948
- ↑ 312Margueritte#1,281 → #969
- ↑ 306Syble#807 → #501
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.