Lora

#2,895 for girls in 2025, 58 births · Last seen for boys in 1987 at #6,951
Given to girls 99.5% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1881 · 80 births
Debut · girls
74 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
52,235
since 1880

Lora over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Lora has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201982peak #168, 1881girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,89558—
2024#3,51644—
2023#3,27449—
2022#3,07353—
2021#3,25049—
2020#2,46870—
2019#3,61142—
2018#2,96255—
2017#3,19250—
2016#2,69764—
2015#2,84661—
2014#2,64866—
2013#2,72663—
2012#2,93558—
2011#3,05155—
2010#3,15952—
2009#2,67268—
2008#3,01757—
2007#2,59771—
2006#2,55571—
2005#2,05791—
2004#1,835103—
2003#2,04887—
2002#2,14278—
2001#1,765101—
2000#1,456126—
1999#1,515113—
1998#1,64698—
1997#1,319131—
1996#1,261138—
1995#1,139154—
1994#1,014183—
1993#1,070170—
1992#874227—
1991#940204—
1990#766267—
1989#684295—
1988#646304—
1987#568350#6,9515
1986#569346—
1985#481436—
1984#479426—
1983#449458—
1982#438492—
1981#435489—
1980#415534—
1979#378593—
1978#348621—
1977#344650—
1976#337657#5,5875
1975#335667#4,3097
1974#321696—
1973#317726—
1972#286889—
1971#2701,068—
1970#2561,202—
1969#2111,476#3,3148
1968#2031,514#3,6736
1967#2161,387#2,9858
1966#2241,357#3,9485
1965#2281,385#3,9305
1964#2181,578—
1963#2131,598—
1962#2351,347#3,6406
1961#2361,325#3,6526
1960#2561,203#3,3377
1959#308891—
1958#330802—
1957#336737—
1956#334689—
1955#361585—
1954#351603—
1953#375516#3,1437
1952#361522—
1951#387446—
1950#345514—
1949#408386—
1948#397400—
1947#423372—
1946#416339—
1945#421285—
1944#445264—
1943#447278—
1942#464251#2,9407
1941#418271#2,8727
1940#412280—
1939#398282#3,1136
1938#365319—
1937#393273—
1936#388268#3,1476
1935#383274—
1934#419245#2,9737
1933#372295—
1932#384291—
1931#375294#2,6519
1930#381322#2,7819
1929#384305—
1928#388296—
1927#370345#3,1518
1926#407280—
1925#366347—
1924#362361#3,0239
1923#353353#3,8226
1922#353341#2,80110
1921#343363#3,5177
1920#340373#3,4897
1919#351333#3,1158
1918#319401#3,0968
1917#307398#3,5456
1916#317366#2,38911
1915#324341#3,3926
1914#320270—
1913#301252#2,0928
1912#291245—
1911#273199—
1910#295173—
1909#274174—
1908#273167—
1907#287145—
1906#246175—
1905#231185—
1904#262144—
1903#253145—
1902#233166—
1901#231159—
1900#242176—
1899#219154—
1898#234157—
1897#212169—
1896#209179—
1895#210166—
1894#197177—
1893#211146#1,0355
1892#218140#7489
1891#201135—
1890#211130—
1889#193138—
1888#224107—
1887#21990#6798
1886#191109—
1885#171113—
1884#22772—
1883#19476—
1882#23355#7547
1881#16880—
1880#17374—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Lora was already there! It came in at #173, and was given to 74 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 2017–2019, when fewer than 56 girls a year got the name.

Where Lora is popular in 1982

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedNHWashington: #663 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,503 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #333 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,659 girlsMNIllinois: #454 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 3,383 girlsILWisconsin: #386 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,491 girlsWIMichigan: #543 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 5,237 girlsMINew York: #637 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 5,137 girlsNYMassachusetts: #543 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,429 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedRIOregon: #465 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,268 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedSDIowa: #337 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,688 girlsIAIndiana: #233 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 1,407 girlsINOhio: #299 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 2,166 girlsOHPennsylvania: #506 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 4,660 girlsPANew Jersey: #718 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,378 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #752 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 6,405 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedUTColorado: #503 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,675 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedNEMissouri: #203 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 1,238 girlsMOKentucky: #155 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 848 girlsKYWest Virginia: #130 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 628 girlsWVVirginia: #390 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,080 girlsVAMaryland: #545 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,457 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedDEArizona: #585 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,033 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedNMKansas: #343 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,217 girlsKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedARTennessee: #209 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 1,169 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #382 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,850 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #384 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,555 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #420 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,822 girlsOKLouisiana: #683 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,280 girlsLAMississippi: #318 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,776 girlsMSAlabama: #373 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,429 girlsALGeorgia: #332 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 2,052 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedHITexas: #496 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 3,419 girlsTXFlorida: #419 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 2,835 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. West Virginia#130 · 1 in 628
  2. Kentucky#155 · 1 in 848
  3. Missouri#203 · 1 in 1,238
  4. Tennessee#209 · 1 in 1,169
  5. Indiana#233 · 1 in 1,407

Best ever in a state: #60 in West Virginia, 1968.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
West Virginia#130181 in 628
Kentucky#155281 in 848
Missouri#203261 in 1,238
Tennessee#209241 in 1,169
Indiana#233251 in 1,407
Ohio#299331 in 2,166
Mississippi#31891 in 1,776
Georgia#332171 in 2,052
Minnesota#333111 in 2,659
Iowa#33771 in 2,688
Kansas#34371 in 2,217
Alabama#37391 in 2,429
North Carolina#382121 in 2,850
South Carolina#38471 in 2,555
Wisconsin#38691 in 3,491
Virginia#390101 in 3,080
Florida#419201 in 2,835
Oklahoma#42081 in 2,822
Illinois#454221 in 3,383
Oregon#46551 in 3,268
Texas#496381 in 3,419
Colorado#50361 in 3,675
Pennsylvania#506151 in 4,660
Massachusetts#54361 in 5,429
Michigan#543111 in 5,237
Maryland#54551 in 4,457
Arizona#58551 in 4,033
New York#637201 in 5,137
Washington#66351 in 5,503
Louisiana#68361 in 5,280
New Jersey#71861 in 6,378
California#752291 in 6,405
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Maine———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lora
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 621 spots since 2024 (#3,516 → #2,895)
  • 427 spots since 2020 (#2,468 → #2,895)
  • 49 spots since 2015 (#2,846 → #2,895)
  • Biggest jump: 66 spots in 1992 (#940 → #874)
  • Biggest drop: 196 spots in 1993 (#874 → #1,070)
Rise & fade · girls
1 yr to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1881 at #168 (80 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 113 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 113 yrs · run 1880–1992
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,083
  • Highest: 1 in 1,083 girls born in 1968 were named Lora (0.09%)
  • Latest: 1 in 27,711 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #168 in 1881, was only 1 in 1,149 (0.09%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1960s
  • 27.1% of all girls named Lora (14,170) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s914#168 (1881)#199
1890s1,553#197 (1894)#212
1900s1,636#231 (1905)#253
1910s2,978#273 (1911)#310
1920s3,364#340 (1920)#367
1930s2,863#365 (1938)#386
1940s3,126#397 (1948)#425
1950s6,305#308 (1959)#349
1960s14,170#203 (1968)#224
1970s7,769#256 (1970)#319
1980s4,130#415 (1980)#516
1990s1,685#766 (1990)#1,154
2000s853#1,456 (2000)#2,214
2010s566#2,648 (2014)#2,983
2020s323#2,468 (2020)#3,079

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lora in 1982

girls
#438
492 births · 1 in 3,442 girls

Top girls' names in 1982

  1. #1Jennifer57,120
  2. #2Jessica45,453
  3. #3Amanda34,214
  4. #4Sarah28,483
  5. #5Melissa25,864
  6. #6Nicole21,706
  7. #7Stephanie20,861
  8. #8Elizabeth20,506
  9. #9Crystal19,099
  10. #10Amy18,799
  11. #438Lora492
More about 1982

girls

1,693,325 girls got a published name in 1982; 1 in 3,442 of them was named Lora, which outranked 96.4% of the 12,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lora
  1. #435Devon502
  2. #436Marsha497
  3. #437Hayley494
  4. #438Lora492
  5. #438Rosanna492
  6. #440Josephine491
  7. #441Alejandra490
  8. #442Isabel487

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1981
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,715Kaleena#2,375 → #660
  2. ↑ 1,197Kala#1,958 → #761
  3. ↑ 1,094Chelsie#2,028 → #934
  4. ↑ 1,081Tenika#2,028 → #947
  5. ↑ 1,044Falon#1,958 → #914
Fallers
  1. ↓ 538Evita#779 → #1,317
  2. ↓ 517Martine#791 → #1,308
  3. ↓ 473Dusty#720 → #1,193
  4. ↓ 470Regan#991 → #1,461
  5. ↓ 401Windy#998 → #1,399

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1982 →