Lora

#2,895 for girls in 2025, 58 births · Last seen for boys in 1987 at #6,951
Given to girls 99.5% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1881 · 80 births
Debut · girls
74 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
52,235
since 1880

Lora over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Lora has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201985peak #168, 1881girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,89558—
2024#3,51644—
2023#3,27449—
2022#3,07353—
2021#3,25049—
2020#2,46870—
2019#3,61142—
2018#2,96255—
2017#3,19250—
2016#2,69764—
2015#2,84661—
2014#2,64866—
2013#2,72663—
2012#2,93558—
2011#3,05155—
2010#3,15952—
2009#2,67268—
2008#3,01757—
2007#2,59771—
2006#2,55571—
2005#2,05791—
2004#1,835103—
2003#2,04887—
2002#2,14278—
2001#1,765101—
2000#1,456126—
1999#1,515113—
1998#1,64698—
1997#1,319131—
1996#1,261138—
1995#1,139154—
1994#1,014183—
1993#1,070170—
1992#874227—
1991#940204—
1990#766267—
1989#684295—
1988#646304—
1987#568350#6,9515
1986#569346—
1985#481436—
1984#479426—
1983#449458—
1982#438492—
1981#435489—
1980#415534—
1979#378593—
1978#348621—
1977#344650—
1976#337657#5,5875
1975#335667#4,3097
1974#321696—
1973#317726—
1972#286889—
1971#2701,068—
1970#2561,202—
1969#2111,476#3,3148
1968#2031,514#3,6736
1967#2161,387#2,9858
1966#2241,357#3,9485
1965#2281,385#3,9305
1964#2181,578—
1963#2131,598—
1962#2351,347#3,6406
1961#2361,325#3,6526
1960#2561,203#3,3377
1959#308891—
1958#330802—
1957#336737—
1956#334689—
1955#361585—
1954#351603—
1953#375516#3,1437
1952#361522—
1951#387446—
1950#345514—
1949#408386—
1948#397400—
1947#423372—
1946#416339—
1945#421285—
1944#445264—
1943#447278—
1942#464251#2,9407
1941#418271#2,8727
1940#412280—
1939#398282#3,1136
1938#365319—
1937#393273—
1936#388268#3,1476
1935#383274—
1934#419245#2,9737
1933#372295—
1932#384291—
1931#375294#2,6519
1930#381322#2,7819
1929#384305—
1928#388296—
1927#370345#3,1518
1926#407280—
1925#366347—
1924#362361#3,0239
1923#353353#3,8226
1922#353341#2,80110
1921#343363#3,5177
1920#340373#3,4897
1919#351333#3,1158
1918#319401#3,0968
1917#307398#3,5456
1916#317366#2,38911
1915#324341#3,3926
1914#320270—
1913#301252#2,0928
1912#291245—
1911#273199—
1910#295173—
1909#274174—
1908#273167—
1907#287145—
1906#246175—
1905#231185—
1904#262144—
1903#253145—
1902#233166—
1901#231159—
1900#242176—
1899#219154—
1898#234157—
1897#212169—
1896#209179—
1895#210166—
1894#197177—
1893#211146#1,0355
1892#218140#7489
1891#201135—
1890#211130—
1889#193138—
1888#224107—
1887#21990#6798
1886#191109—
1885#171113—
1884#22772—
1883#19476—
1882#23355#7547
1881#16880—
1880#17374—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Lora was already there! It came in at #173, and was given to 74 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 2017–2019, when fewer than 56 girls a year got the name.

Where Lora is popular in 1985

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #481 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,757 girlsMNIllinois: #497 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 3,842 girlsILWisconsin: #451 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,378 girlsWIMichigan: #561 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 5,206 girlsMINew York: #781 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 7,126 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedRIOregon: #406 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,606 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedSDIowa: #368 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,875 girlsIAIndiana: #263 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,792 girlsINOhio: #372 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 3,004 girlsOHPennsylvania: #368 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 3,006 girlsPANew Jersey: #818 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,083 girlsNJConnecticut: #419 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,407 girlsCTCalifornia: #624 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 4,704 girlsCAUtah: #441 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,869 girlsUTColorado: #402 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,745 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedNEMissouri: #437 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,576 girlsMOKentucky: #149 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 850 girlsKYWest Virginia: #125 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 614 girlsWVVirginia: #375 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,746 girlsVAMaryland: #497 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,019 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedDEArizona: #572 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,833 girlsAZNew Mexico: #378 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,921 girlsNMKansas: #405 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,930 girlsKSArkansas: #234 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,411 girlsARTennessee: #310 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,136 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #343 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 2,370 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #285 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,677 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedLAMississippi: #300 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,637 girlsMSAlabama: #254 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,556 girlsALGeorgia: #434 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 3,091 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Lora, so not publishedHITexas: #605 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 4,763 girlsTXFlorida: #536 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 4,079 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. West Virginia#125 · 1 in 614
  2. Kentucky#149 · 1 in 850
  3. Arkansas#234 · 1 in 1,411
  4. Alabama#254 · 1 in 1,556
  5. Indiana#263 · 1 in 1,792

Best ever in a state: #60 in West Virginia, 1968.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
West Virginia#125161 in 614
Kentucky#149251 in 850
Arkansas#23491 in 1,411
Alabama#254141 in 1,556
Indiana#263191 in 1,792
Oklahoma#285121 in 1,677
Mississippi#30091 in 1,637
Tennessee#310131 in 2,136
North Carolina#343151 in 2,370
Iowa#36861 in 2,875
Pennsylvania#368231 in 3,006
Ohio#372231 in 3,004
Virginia#375121 in 2,746
New Mexico#37851 in 1,921
Colorado#40281 in 2,745
Kansas#40551 in 2,930
Oregon#40661 in 2,606
Connecticut#41951 in 3,407
Georgia#434121 in 3,091
Missouri#43791 in 3,576
Utah#44151 in 2,869
Wisconsin#45171 in 4,378
Minnesota#48161 in 4,757
Illinois#497191 in 3,842
Maryland#49761 in 4,019
Florida#536161 in 4,079
Michigan#561111 in 5,206
Arizona#57261 in 3,833
Texas#605281 in 4,763
California#624431 in 4,704
New York#781151 in 7,126
New Jersey#81851 in 8,083
Alaska———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
Washington———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lora
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 621 spots since 2024 (#3,516 → #2,895)
  • 427 spots since 2020 (#2,468 → #2,895)
  • 49 spots since 2015 (#2,846 → #2,895)
  • Biggest jump: 66 spots in 1992 (#940 → #874)
  • Biggest drop: 196 spots in 1993 (#874 → #1,070)
Rise & fade · girls
1 yr to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1881 at #168 (80 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 113 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 113 yrs · run 1880–1992
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,083
  • Highest: 1 in 1,083 girls born in 1968 were named Lora (0.09%)
  • Latest: 1 in 27,711 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #168 in 1881, was only 1 in 1,149 (0.09%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1960s
  • 27.1% of all girls named Lora (14,170) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s914#168 (1881)#199
1890s1,553#197 (1894)#212
1900s1,636#231 (1905)#253
1910s2,978#273 (1911)#310
1920s3,364#340 (1920)#367
1930s2,863#365 (1938)#386
1940s3,126#397 (1948)#425
1950s6,305#308 (1959)#349
1960s14,170#203 (1968)#224
1970s7,769#256 (1970)#319
1980s4,130#415 (1980)#516
1990s1,685#766 (1990)#1,154
2000s853#1,456 (2000)#2,214
2010s566#2,648 (2014)#2,983
2020s323#2,468 (2020)#3,079

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lora in 1985

girls
#481
436 births · 1 in 3,947 girls

Top girls' names in 1985

  1. #1Jessica48,345
  2. #2Ashley47,010
  3. #3Jennifer42,661
  4. #4Amanda39,055
  5. #5Sarah24,879
  6. #6Stephanie23,243
  7. #7Nicole22,966
  8. #8Heather21,151
  9. #9Elizabeth20,545
  10. #10Megan20,013
  11. #481Lora436
More about 1985

girls

1,720,828 girls got a published name in 1985; 1 in 3,947 of them was named Lora, which outranked 96.2% of the 12,505 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 18.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lora
  1. #477Leann440
  2. #477Sydney440
  3. #480Belinda437
  4. #481Lora436
  5. #482Mackenzie433
  6. #483Tameka429
  7. #484Janine426
Biggest movers since 1984
Risers
  1. ↑ 7,360Kayleigh#8,153 → #793
  2. ↑ 1,675Madison#2,299 → #624
  3. ↑ 1,167Cierra#1,633 → #466
  4. ↑ 1,002Ciera#1,703 → #701
  5. ↑ 787Krystina#1,332 → #545
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,164Grisel#784 → #1,948
  2. ↓ 893Ciji#963 → #1,856
  3. ↓ 419Falon#914 → #1,333
  4. ↓ 364Alesia#969 → #1,333
  5. ↓ 362Echo#845 → #1,207

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1985 →