Loreen
#10,917 for girls in 2025, 8 births
- Peak · girls
- 1964 · 128 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,596since 1898
Loreen over time
Rank among girls' names. Loreen has never cracked the top 900 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,917 | 8 |
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 |
| 2023 | — | |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 |
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 |
| 2020 | — | |
| 2019 | #11,356 | 8 |
| 2018 | #13,793 | 6 |
| 2017 | #14,124 | 6 |
| 2016 | — | |
| 2015 | #11,835 | 8 |
| 2014 | #9,517 | 11 |
| 2013 | #11,969 | 8 |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 |
| 2010 | — | |
| 2009 | — | |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 |
| 2007 | #11,630 | 9 |
| 2006 | — | |
| 2005 | — | |
| 2004 | — | |
| 2003 | — | |
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 |
| 1999 | — | |
| 1998 | #9,260 | 9 |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 |
| 1996 | #10,567 | 7 |
| 1995 | — | |
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 |
| 1993 | #8,052 | 10 |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 |
| 1990 | #6,867 | 12 |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 |
| 1988 | #6,666 | 11 |
| 1987 | #6,335 | 11 |
| 1986 | #4,186 | 19 |
| 1985 | #4,635 | 16 |
| 1984 | #4,966 | 14 |
| 1983 | #4,476 | 16 |
| 1982 | #4,167 | 18 |
| 1981 | #4,344 | 17 |
| 1980 | #4,148 | 18 |
| 1979 | #6,696 | 9 |
| 1978 | #3,924 | 18 |
| 1977 | #2,838 | 28 |
| 1976 | #3,540 | 19 |
| 1975 | #3,514 | 19 |
| 1974 | #3,695 | 17 |
| 1973 | #2,753 | 25 |
| 1972 | #2,173 | 35 |
| 1971 | #1,937 | 44 |
| 1970 | #1,562 | 62 |
| 1969 | #1,531 | 60 |
| 1968 | #1,267 | 75 |
| 1967 | #1,133 | 87 |
| 1966 | #1,135 | 87 |
| 1965 | #1,122 | 89 |
| 1964 | #928 | 128 |
| 1963 | #990 | 116 |
| 1962 | #1,066 | 102 |
| 1961 | #968 | 124 |
| 1960 | #954 | 125 |
| 1959 | #1,110 | 93 |
| 1958 | #958 | 116 |
| 1957 | #1,015 | 106 |
| 1956 | #1,034 | 98 |
| 1955 | #1,004 | 99 |
| 1954 | #952 | 103 |
| 1953 | #1,130 | 74 |
| 1952 | #1,256 | 57 |
| 1951 | #1,133 | 68 |
| 1950 | #1,285 | 51 |
| 1949 | #1,088 | 68 |
| 1948 | #993 | 77 |
| 1947 | #1,059 | 70 |
| 1946 | #1,131 | 56 |
| 1945 | #1,100 | 51 |
| 1944 | #1,381 | 34 |
| 1943 | #1,197 | 46 |
| 1942 | #1,559 | 28 |
| 1941 | #1,166 | 41 |
| 1940 | #1,242 | 35 |
| 1939 | #1,350 | 30 |
| 1938 | #1,596 | 23 |
| 1937 | #1,493 | 25 |
| 1936 | #1,507 | 24 |
| 1935 | #1,917 | 17 |
| 1934 | #1,603 | 22 |
| 1933 | #1,906 | 17 |
| 1932 | #1,685 | 21 |
| 1931 | #1,686 | 21 |
| 1930 | #2,023 | 17 |
| 1929 | #1,555 | 25 |
| 1928 | #1,502 | 28 |
| 1927 | #1,619 | 26 |
| 1926 | #1,541 | 28 |
| 1925 | #1,700 | 25 |
| 1924 | #1,872 | 22 |
| 1923 | #2,091 | 18 |
| 1922 | #1,575 | 28 |
| 1921 | #2,282 | 16 |
| 1920 | #1,626 | 26 |
| 1919 | #1,481 | 28 |
| 1918 | #2,519 | 13 |
| 1917 | #2,204 | 15 |
| 1916 | #1,867 | 18 |
| 1915 | #1,800 | 18 |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 |
| 1913 | #2,164 | 9 |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | #2,208 | 5 |
| 1908 | #2,101 | 5 |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,727 | 6 |
| 1905 | #1,538 | 7 |
| 1904 | #1,251 | 9 |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,502 | 6 |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Loreen! It came in at #1,502, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1899, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Loreen is popular in 1964
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Massachusetts#346 · 1 in 3,585
- Minnesota#462 · 1 in 5,652
- Pennsylvania#647 · 1 in 10,002
- Michigan#710 · 1 in 11,163
- Ohio#782 · 1 in 13,427
Best ever in a state: #209 in South Dakota, 1925.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts | #346 | 14 | 1 in 3,585 |
| Minnesota | #462 | 6 | 1 in 5,652 |
| Pennsylvania | #647 | 10 | 1 in 10,002 |
| Michigan | #710 | 7 | 1 in 11,163 |
| Ohio | #782 | 7 | 1 in 13,427 |
| California | #791 | 18 | 1 in 9,549 |
| Illinois | #874 | 7 | 1 in 14,024 |
| New York | #891 | 11 | 1 in 14,609 |
| Texas | #1,277 | 5 | 1 in 20,856 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Loreen
- 2,560 spots since 2024 (#13,477 → #10,917)
- 918 spots since 2015 (#11,835 → #10,917)
- Biggest jump: 178 spots in 1954 (#1,130 → #952)
- Biggest drop: 194 spots in 1965 (#928 → #1,122)
- Debuted 1898
- Peaked 1964 at #928 (128 births)
- Births halved by 1969, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 1960–1961
- Highest: 1 in 14,804 girls born in 1964 were named Loreen (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 200,908 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 27.6% of all girls named Loreen (993) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 6 | #1,502 (1898) | #1,502 |
| 1900s | 38 | #1,251 (1904) | #1,758 |
| 1910s | 114 | #1,481 (1919) | #2,225 |
| 1920s | 242 | #1,502 (1928) | #1,736 |
| 1930s | 217 | #1,350 (1939) | #1,677 |
| 1940s | 506 | #993 (1948) | #1,192 |
| 1950s | 865 | #952 (1954) | #1,088 |
| 1960s | 993 | #928 (1964) | #1,109 |
| 1970s | 276 | #1,562 (1970) | #3,263 |
| 1980s | 147 | #4,148 (1980) | #5,360 |
| 1990s | 69 | #6,867 (1990) | #9,279 |
| 2000s | 32 | #11,630 (2007) | #13,955 |
| 2010s | 63 | #9,517 (2014) | #12,118 |
| 2020s | 28 | #10,917 (2025) | #12,272 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Loreen in 1964
Top girls' names in 1964
More about 1964
girls
1,894,855 girls got a published name in 1964; 1 in 14,804 of them was named Loreen, which outranked 88.1% of the 7,806 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).