Loretta

#606 for girls in 2025, 485 births · Last seen for boys in 1981 at #6,262
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1938 · 3,913 births
Debut · girls
41 births
In top 100 · girls
14 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
177,564
since 1880

Loretta over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202012peak #62, 1938girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#606485—
2024#677423—
2023#757371—
2022#810346—
2021#901300—
2020#942272—
2019#1,020252—
2018#1,085232—
2017#1,102229—
2016#1,082240—
2015#1,154219—
2014#1,321179—
2013#1,713121—
2012#1,690124—
2011#1,817111—
2010#2,04397—
2009#2,31684—
2008#1,890112—
2007#1,957105—
2006#1,809113—
2005#1,878103—
2004#2,03090—
2003#2,16780—
2002#2,17876—
2001#2,12677—
2000#1,85592—
1999#1,636102—
1998#1,597102—
1997#1,496109—
1996#1,256139—
1995#1,330124—
1994#1,264135—
1993#1,254137—
1992#1,231141—
1991#1,009184—
1990#921207—
1989#907201—
1988#747251—
1987#686269—
1986#624297—
1985#644287—
1984#587309—
1983#540347—
1982#492413—
1981#439487#6,2625
1980#494418—
1979#422495—
1978#420481—
1977#374571—
1976#333671—
1975#301778—
1974#266956—
1973#257972—
1972#2581,047—
1971#2281,304#4,9075
1970#2311,365#4,7245
1969#2041,541#3,5957
1968#1941,627#3,1078
1967#1771,803#3,9665
1966#1751,899#2,46511
1965#1851,839#3,9305
1964#1742,228#3,0508
1963#1612,507#4,0485
1962#1602,513#2,50411
1961#1482,922#3,3567
1960#1383,191#2,31513
1959#1363,156#2,03316
1958#1323,314#3,2757
1957#1313,350#2,8229
1956#1263,407#2,7989
1955#1233,431#2,43511
1954#1253,245#3,1767
1953#1362,666—
1952#1362,616#3,3736
1951#1352,489#2,8448
1950#1202,720#3,0217
1949#1172,776—
1948#1152,868#3,3166
1947#1133,001#2,8628
1946#1112,892#2,40310
1945#1072,661#2,5748
1944#982,746#2,4679
1943#893,169#3,5385
1942#793,406#2,26811
1941#813,100#1,82115
1940#693,502#2,17911
1939#653,769#1,71216
1938#623,913#1,61318
1937#633,673#1,99213
1936#703,325#1,63917
1935#693,365#1,92914
1934#832,978#1,93214
1933#872,705#1,49821
1932#892,746#2,46510
1931#962,581#2,6519
1930#1052,482#2,17813
1929#1271,939#2,19913
1928#1231,996#2,65910
1927#1272,018#4,2105
1926#1262,108#3,7086
1925#1222,255#2,9369
1924#1242,261#3,2608
1923#1242,143—
1922#1252,095#3,8726
1921#1222,134#4,3225
1920#1202,122—
1919#1182,067#3,7366
1918#1162,051—
1917#1141,970—
1916#1131,903#3,1777
1915#1151,810#3,8255
1914#1221,323#2,9156
1913#1181,074—
1912#119978#2,2696
1911#118739#1,3877
1910#124655—
1909#123573—
1908#119566—
1907#126520—
1906#120520—
1905#121527—
1904#116506—
1903#114505—
1902#124461—
1901#118438—
1900#121535—
1899#119410—
1898#118454—
1897#123406—
1896#122391—
1895#126365—
1894#131330—
1893#132323—
1892#152263—
1891#159212—
1890#156228—
1889#170172—
1888#177157—
1887#174134—
1886#164141—
1885#19791—
1884#18794—
1883#19476—
1882#19472—
1881#19658—
1880#24041—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Loretta was already there! It came in at #240, and was given to 41 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 59 girls a year got the name.

Where Loretta is popular in 2012

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,450 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 9,793 girlsILWisconsin: #425 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,921 girlsWIMichigan: #1,074 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,862 girlsMINew York: #1,962 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 15,379 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedIAIndiana: #888 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,006 girlsINOhio: #1,225 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 8,596 girlsOHPennsylvania: #1,225 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 8,792 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #3,104 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 34,847 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNEMissouri: #720 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,846 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedHITexas: #1,408 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 9,895 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Wisconsin#425 · 1 in 1,921
  2. Missouri#720 · 1 in 3,846
  3. Indiana#888 · 1 in 5,006
  4. Michigan#1,074 · 1 in 6,862
  5. Ohio#1,225 · 1 in 8,596

Best ever in a state: #20 in Nevada, 1938.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Wisconsin#425121 in 1,921
Missouri#72071 in 3,846
Indiana#88861 in 5,006
Michigan#1,07461 in 6,862
Ohio#1,22561 in 8,596
Pennsylvania#1,22561 in 8,792
Texas#1,408161 in 9,895
Illinois#1,45061 in 9,793
New York#1,96261 in 15,379
California#3,10461 in 34,847
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Loretta
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 71 spots since 2024 (#677 → #606)
  • 336 spots since 2020 (#942 → #606)
  • 548 spots since 2015 (#1,154 → #606)
  • Biggest jump: 91 spots in 2022 (#901 → #810)
  • Biggest drop: 160 spots in 1989 (#747 → #907)
Rise & fade · girls
58 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1938 at #62 (3,913 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 27 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 14 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 14 yrs · run 1931–1944
  • Top 1,000: 117 yrs · run 1880–1990
Share of babies · girls
1 in 282
  • Highest: 1 in 282 girls born in 1938 were named Loretta (0.35%)
  • Latest: 1 in 3,314 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
  • 17.8% of all girls named Loretta (31,537) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s1,036#164 (1886)#189
1890s3,382#118 (1898)#134
1900s5,151#114 (1903)#120
1910s14,570#113 (1916)#118
1920s21,071#120 (1920)#124
1930s31,537#62 (1938)#79
1940s30,121#69 (1940)#98
1950s30,394#120 (1950)#130
1960s22,070#138 (1960)#172
1970s8,640#228 (1971)#309
1980s3,279#439 (1981)#616
1990s1,380#921 (1990)#1,299
2000s932#1,809 (2006)#2,021
2010s1,804#1,020 (2019)#1,403
2020s2,197#606 (2025)#782

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Loretta in 2012

girls
#1,690
124 births · 1 in 14,202 girls

Top girls' names in 2012

  1. #1Sophia22,336
  2. #2Emma20,976
  3. #3Isabella19,138
  4. #4Olivia17,333
  5. #5Ava15,549
  6. #6Emily13,666
  7. #7Abigail12,730
  8. #8Mia12,039
  9. #9Madison11,417
  10. #10Elizabeth9,730
  11. #1,690Loretta124
More about 2012

girls

1,761,053 girls got a published name in 2012; 1 in 14,202 of them was named Loretta, which outranked 91.3% of the 19,534 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Loretta
  1. #1,685Jolee125
  2. #1,685Kahlan125
  3. #1,685Shayna125
  4. #1,690Loretta124
  5. #1,690Calleigh124
  6. #1,690Cleo124
  7. #1,690Eleni124
  8. #1,698Aarna123
  9. #1,698Aarya123
  10. #1,698Agnes123

Tied with 7 names at #1,690; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2011
Risers
  1. ↑ 4,327Cataleya#4,807 → #480
  2. ↑ 1,931Adley#2,664 → #733
  3. ↑ 917Litzy#1,515 → #598
  4. ↑ 784Kenia#1,427 → #643
  5. ↑ 580Monroe#1,531 → #951
Fallers
  1. ↓ 429Jaden#979 → #1,408
  2. ↓ 365Payten#994 → #1,359
  3. ↓ 326Yamilet#925 → #1,251
  4. ↓ 316Shaniya#915 → #1,231
  5. ↓ 264Shania#898 → #1,162

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2012 →