Loretta

#606 for girls in 2025, 485 births · Last seen for boys in 1981 at #6,262
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1938 · 3,913 births
Debut · girls
41 births
In top 100 · girls
14 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
177,564
since 1880

Loretta over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202015peak #62, 1938girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#606485—
2024#677423—
2023#757371—
2022#810346—
2021#901300—
2020#942272—
2019#1,020252—
2018#1,085232—
2017#1,102229—
2016#1,082240—
2015#1,154219—
2014#1,321179—
2013#1,713121—
2012#1,690124—
2011#1,817111—
2010#2,04397—
2009#2,31684—
2008#1,890112—
2007#1,957105—
2006#1,809113—
2005#1,878103—
2004#2,03090—
2003#2,16780—
2002#2,17876—
2001#2,12677—
2000#1,85592—
1999#1,636102—
1998#1,597102—
1997#1,496109—
1996#1,256139—
1995#1,330124—
1994#1,264135—
1993#1,254137—
1992#1,231141—
1991#1,009184—
1990#921207—
1989#907201—
1988#747251—
1987#686269—
1986#624297—
1985#644287—
1984#587309—
1983#540347—
1982#492413—
1981#439487#6,2625
1980#494418—
1979#422495—
1978#420481—
1977#374571—
1976#333671—
1975#301778—
1974#266956—
1973#257972—
1972#2581,047—
1971#2281,304#4,9075
1970#2311,365#4,7245
1969#2041,541#3,5957
1968#1941,627#3,1078
1967#1771,803#3,9665
1966#1751,899#2,46511
1965#1851,839#3,9305
1964#1742,228#3,0508
1963#1612,507#4,0485
1962#1602,513#2,50411
1961#1482,922#3,3567
1960#1383,191#2,31513
1959#1363,156#2,03316
1958#1323,314#3,2757
1957#1313,350#2,8229
1956#1263,407#2,7989
1955#1233,431#2,43511
1954#1253,245#3,1767
1953#1362,666—
1952#1362,616#3,3736
1951#1352,489#2,8448
1950#1202,720#3,0217
1949#1172,776—
1948#1152,868#3,3166
1947#1133,001#2,8628
1946#1112,892#2,40310
1945#1072,661#2,5748
1944#982,746#2,4679
1943#893,169#3,5385
1942#793,406#2,26811
1941#813,100#1,82115
1940#693,502#2,17911
1939#653,769#1,71216
1938#623,913#1,61318
1937#633,673#1,99213
1936#703,325#1,63917
1935#693,365#1,92914
1934#832,978#1,93214
1933#872,705#1,49821
1932#892,746#2,46510
1931#962,581#2,6519
1930#1052,482#2,17813
1929#1271,939#2,19913
1928#1231,996#2,65910
1927#1272,018#4,2105
1926#1262,108#3,7086
1925#1222,255#2,9369
1924#1242,261#3,2608
1923#1242,143—
1922#1252,095#3,8726
1921#1222,134#4,3225
1920#1202,122—
1919#1182,067#3,7366
1918#1162,051—
1917#1141,970—
1916#1131,903#3,1777
1915#1151,810#3,8255
1914#1221,323#2,9156
1913#1181,074—
1912#119978#2,2696
1911#118739#1,3877
1910#124655—
1909#123573—
1908#119566—
1907#126520—
1906#120520—
1905#121527—
1904#116506—
1903#114505—
1902#124461—
1901#118438—
1900#121535—
1899#119410—
1898#118454—
1897#123406—
1896#122391—
1895#126365—
1894#131330—
1893#132323—
1892#152263—
1891#159212—
1890#156228—
1889#170172—
1888#177157—
1887#174134—
1886#164141—
1885#19791—
1884#18794—
1883#19476—
1882#19472—
1881#19658—
1880#24041—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Loretta was already there! It came in at #240, and was given to 41 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 59 girls a year got the name.

Where Loretta is popular in 2015

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNHWashington: #931 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,224 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #667 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,495 girlsMNIllinois: #1,634 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 11,706 girlsILWisconsin: #480 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,116 girlsWIMichigan: #1,004 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,027 girlsMINew York: #1,071 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 6,523 girlsNYMassachusetts: #830 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,056 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedRIOregon: #585 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,538 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedIAIndiana: #618 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,063 girlsINOhio: #1,447 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 10,556 girlsOHPennsylvania: #674 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 3,520 girlsPANew Jersey: #1,183 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,432 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,381 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 10,267 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNEMissouri: #947 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,439 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedARTennessee: #919 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,193 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #1,391 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,081 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #760 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,367 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedHITexas: #1,230 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 8,080 girlsTXFlorida: #1,833 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 14,328 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Wisconsin#480 · 1 in 2,116
  2. Oregon#585 · 1 in 2,538
  3. Indiana#618 · 1 in 3,063
  4. Minnesota#667 · 1 in 3,495
  5. Pennsylvania#674 · 1 in 3,520

Best ever in a state: #20 in Nevada, 1938.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Wisconsin#480111 in 2,116
Oregon#58561 in 2,538
Indiana#618101 in 3,063
Minnesota#66771 in 3,495
Pennsylvania#674151 in 3,520
Oklahoma#76051 in 3,367
Massachusetts#83051 in 5,056
Tennessee#91961 in 5,193
Washington#93161 in 5,224
Missouri#94751 in 5,439
Michigan#1,00471 in 6,027
New York#1,071141 in 6,523
New Jersey#1,18351 in 7,432
Texas#1,230211 in 8,080
California#1,381201 in 10,267
North Carolina#1,39151 in 9,081
Ohio#1,44751 in 10,556
Illinois#1,63451 in 11,706
Florida#1,83361 in 14,328
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Loretta
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 71 spots since 2024 (#677 → #606)
  • 336 spots since 2020 (#942 → #606)
  • 548 spots since 2015 (#1,154 → #606)
  • Biggest jump: 91 spots in 2022 (#901 → #810)
  • Biggest drop: 160 spots in 1989 (#747 → #907)
Rise & fade · girls
58 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1938 at #62 (3,913 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 27 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 14 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 14 yrs · run 1931–1944
  • Top 1,000: 117 yrs · run 1880–1990
Share of babies · girls
1 in 282
  • Highest: 1 in 282 girls born in 1938 were named Loretta (0.35%)
  • Latest: 1 in 3,314 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
  • 17.8% of all girls named Loretta (31,537) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s1,036#164 (1886)#189
1890s3,382#118 (1898)#134
1900s5,151#114 (1903)#120
1910s14,570#113 (1916)#118
1920s21,071#120 (1920)#124
1930s31,537#62 (1938)#79
1940s30,121#69 (1940)#98
1950s30,394#120 (1950)#130
1960s22,070#138 (1960)#172
1970s8,640#228 (1971)#309
1980s3,279#439 (1981)#616
1990s1,380#921 (1990)#1,299
2000s932#1,809 (2006)#2,021
2010s1,804#1,020 (2019)#1,403
2020s2,197#606 (2025)#782

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Loretta in 2015

girls
#1,154
219 births · 1 in 8,151 girls

Top girls' names in 2015

  1. #1Emma20,487
  2. #2Olivia19,729
  3. #3Sophia17,454
  4. #4Ava16,416
  5. #5Isabella15,667
  6. #6Mia14,943
  7. #7Abigail12,422
  8. #8Emily11,808
  9. #9Charlotte11,415
  10. #10Harper10,311
  11. #1,154Loretta219
More about 2015

girls

1,785,098 girls got a published name in 2015; 1 in 8,151 of them was named Loretta, which outranked 94.0% of the 19,130 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Loretta
  1. #1,146Royalty221
  2. #1,146Violeta221
  3. #1,153Bree220
  4. #1,154Loretta219
  5. #1,155Addalynn218
  6. #1,155Della218
  7. #1,155Gracyn218
Biggest movers since 2014
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,984Alaia#2,648 → #664
  2. ↑ 1,835Meilani#2,781 → #946
  3. ↑ 1,733Aitana#2,648 → #915
  4. ↑ 1,387Aislinn#2,351 → #964
  5. ↑ 1,072Taya#2,049 → #977
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,075Isis#703 → #1,778
  2. ↓ 502Annabell#923 → #1,425
  3. ↓ 500Anabel#911 → #1,411
  4. ↓ 344Cindy#711 → #1,055
  5. ↓ 334Anabella#529 → #863

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2015 →