Loretta

#606 for girls in 2025, 485 births · Last seen for boys in 1981 at #6,262
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1938 · 3,913 births
Debut · girls
41 births
In top 100 · girls
14 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
177,564
since 1880

Loretta over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202016peak #62, 1938girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#606485—
2024#677423—
2023#757371—
2022#810346—
2021#901300—
2020#942272—
2019#1,020252—
2018#1,085232—
2017#1,102229—
2016#1,082240—
2015#1,154219—
2014#1,321179—
2013#1,713121—
2012#1,690124—
2011#1,817111—
2010#2,04397—
2009#2,31684—
2008#1,890112—
2007#1,957105—
2006#1,809113—
2005#1,878103—
2004#2,03090—
2003#2,16780—
2002#2,17876—
2001#2,12677—
2000#1,85592—
1999#1,636102—
1998#1,597102—
1997#1,496109—
1996#1,256139—
1995#1,330124—
1994#1,264135—
1993#1,254137—
1992#1,231141—
1991#1,009184—
1990#921207—
1989#907201—
1988#747251—
1987#686269—
1986#624297—
1985#644287—
1984#587309—
1983#540347—
1982#492413—
1981#439487#6,2625
1980#494418—
1979#422495—
1978#420481—
1977#374571—
1976#333671—
1975#301778—
1974#266956—
1973#257972—
1972#2581,047—
1971#2281,304#4,9075
1970#2311,365#4,7245
1969#2041,541#3,5957
1968#1941,627#3,1078
1967#1771,803#3,9665
1966#1751,899#2,46511
1965#1851,839#3,9305
1964#1742,228#3,0508
1963#1612,507#4,0485
1962#1602,513#2,50411
1961#1482,922#3,3567
1960#1383,191#2,31513
1959#1363,156#2,03316
1958#1323,314#3,2757
1957#1313,350#2,8229
1956#1263,407#2,7989
1955#1233,431#2,43511
1954#1253,245#3,1767
1953#1362,666—
1952#1362,616#3,3736
1951#1352,489#2,8448
1950#1202,720#3,0217
1949#1172,776—
1948#1152,868#3,3166
1947#1133,001#2,8628
1946#1112,892#2,40310
1945#1072,661#2,5748
1944#982,746#2,4679
1943#893,169#3,5385
1942#793,406#2,26811
1941#813,100#1,82115
1940#693,502#2,17911
1939#653,769#1,71216
1938#623,913#1,61318
1937#633,673#1,99213
1936#703,325#1,63917
1935#693,365#1,92914
1934#832,978#1,93214
1933#872,705#1,49821
1932#892,746#2,46510
1931#962,581#2,6519
1930#1052,482#2,17813
1929#1271,939#2,19913
1928#1231,996#2,65910
1927#1272,018#4,2105
1926#1262,108#3,7086
1925#1222,255#2,9369
1924#1242,261#3,2608
1923#1242,143—
1922#1252,095#3,8726
1921#1222,134#4,3225
1920#1202,122—
1919#1182,067#3,7366
1918#1162,051—
1917#1141,970—
1916#1131,903#3,1777
1915#1151,810#3,8255
1914#1221,323#2,9156
1913#1181,074—
1912#119978#2,2696
1911#118739#1,3877
1910#124655—
1909#123573—
1908#119566—
1907#126520—
1906#120520—
1905#121527—
1904#116506—
1903#114505—
1902#124461—
1901#118438—
1900#121535—
1899#119410—
1898#118454—
1897#123406—
1896#122391—
1895#126365—
1894#131330—
1893#132323—
1892#152263—
1891#159212—
1890#156228—
1889#170172—
1888#177157—
1887#174134—
1886#164141—
1885#19791—
1884#18794—
1883#19476—
1882#19472—
1881#19658—
1880#24041—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Loretta was already there! It came in at #240, and was given to 41 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 59 girls a year got the name.

Where Loretta is popular in 2016

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNHWashington: #422 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,891 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #454 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,045 girlsMNIllinois: #990 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 5,763 girlsILWisconsin: #434 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,942 girlsWIMichigan: #1,000 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,010 girlsMINew York: #1,447 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 9,982 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedSDIowa: #400 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,625 girlsIAIndiana: #675 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,366 girlsINOhio: #622 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 3,254 girlsOHPennsylvania: #1,138 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 7,408 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #2,306 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 22,635 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedUTColorado: #636 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,945 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNEMissouri: #603 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,014 girlsMOKentucky: #721 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,652 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedWVVirginia: #842 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,642 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedDEArizona: #959 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,157 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #1,002 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 5,664 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #784 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,358 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedALGeorgia: #1,319 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 8,008 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Loretta, so not publishedHITexas: #1,471 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 10,456 girlsTXFlorida: #1,813 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 14,451 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Iowa#400 · 1 in 1,625
  2. Washington#422 · 1 in 1,891
  3. Wisconsin#434 · 1 in 1,942
  4. Minnesota#454 · 1 in 2,045
  5. Missouri#603 · 1 in 3,014

Best ever in a state: #20 in Nevada, 1938.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Iowa#40081 in 1,625
Washington#422171 in 1,891
Wisconsin#434121 in 1,942
Minnesota#454121 in 2,045
Missouri#60391 in 3,014
Ohio#622161 in 3,254
Colorado#63681 in 2,945
Indiana#67591 in 3,366
Kentucky#72151 in 3,652
Oklahoma#78451 in 3,358
Virginia#84281 in 4,642
Arizona#95961 in 5,157
Illinois#990101 in 5,763
Michigan#1,00071 in 6,010
North Carolina#1,00281 in 5,664
Pennsylvania#1,13871 in 7,408
Georgia#1,31961 in 8,008
New York#1,44791 in 9,982
Texas#1,471161 in 10,456
Florida#1,81361 in 14,451
California#2,30691 in 22,635
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kansas———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Loretta
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 71 spots since 2024 (#677 → #606)
  • 336 spots since 2020 (#942 → #606)
  • 548 spots since 2015 (#1,154 → #606)
  • Biggest jump: 91 spots in 2022 (#901 → #810)
  • Biggest drop: 160 spots in 1989 (#747 → #907)
Rise & fade · girls
58 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1938 at #62 (3,913 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 27 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 14 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 14 yrs · run 1931–1944
  • Top 1,000: 117 yrs · run 1880–1990
Share of babies · girls
1 in 282
  • Highest: 1 in 282 girls born in 1938 were named Loretta (0.35%)
  • Latest: 1 in 3,314 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
  • 17.8% of all girls named Loretta (31,537) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s1,036#164 (1886)#189
1890s3,382#118 (1898)#134
1900s5,151#114 (1903)#120
1910s14,570#113 (1916)#118
1920s21,071#120 (1920)#124
1930s31,537#62 (1938)#79
1940s30,121#69 (1940)#98
1950s30,394#120 (1950)#130
1960s22,070#138 (1960)#172
1970s8,640#228 (1971)#309
1980s3,279#439 (1981)#616
1990s1,380#921 (1990)#1,299
2000s932#1,809 (2006)#2,021
2010s1,804#1,020 (2019)#1,403
2020s2,197#606 (2025)#782

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Loretta in 2016

girls
#1,082
240 births · 1 in 7,383 girls

Top girls' names in 2016

  1. #1Emma19,550
  2. #2Olivia19,414
  3. #3Ava16,354
  4. #4Sophia16,185
  5. #5Isabella14,863
  6. #6Mia14,464
  7. #7Charlotte13,118
  8. #8Abigail11,796
  9. #9Emily11,006
  10. #10Amelia10,809
  11. #1,082Loretta240
More about 2016

girls

1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 7,383 of them was named Loretta, which outranked 94.3% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Loretta
  1. #1,078Malayah241
  2. #1,078Palmer241
  3. #1,078Valery241
  4. #1,082Loretta240
  5. #1,082Aiyanna240
  6. #1,082Cristina240
  7. #1,082Keily240
  8. #1,086Robin239
  9. #1,086Samira239
  10. #1,088Janiya237

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2015
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,389Kehlani#3,254 → #865
  2. ↑ 612Royalty#1,146 → #534
  3. ↑ 481Saoirse#1,448 → #967
  4. ↑ 396Ophelia#978 → #582
  5. ↑ 364Aitana#915 → #551
Fallers
  1. ↓ 542Caitlin#610 → #1,152
  2. ↓ 451Caitlyn#598 → #1,049
  3. ↓ 397Katelynn#652 → #1,049
  4. ↓ 382Kaitlynn#989 → #1,371
  5. ↓ 340Neriah#946 → #1,286

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2016 →