Lossie
Last seen for girls in 1961 at #6,567 · Last seen for boys in 1932 at #3,776
Given to girls 98.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1900 · 26 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,189since 1883
Lossie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Lossie has never cracked the top 700 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | #4,520 | 8 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 | — | |
| 1956 | #3,910 | 10 | — | |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 | — | |
| 1954 | #5,148 | 6 | — | |
| 1953 | #4,226 | 8 | — | |
| 1952 | #3,552 | 10 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,937 | 13 | — | |
| 1950 | #4,738 | 6 | — | |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | — | |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,240 | 11 | — | |
| 1946 | #4,960 | 5 | — | |
| 1945 | #3,132 | 9 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,511 | 13 | — | |
| 1943 | #2,151 | 17 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,117 | 17 | — | |
| 1941 | #3,030 | 9 | — | |
| 1940 | #2,203 | 14 | — | |
| 1939 | #2,736 | 10 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,547 | 24 | — | |
| 1937 | #2,101 | 15 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,640 | 21 | — | |
| 1935 | #2,206 | 14 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,556 | 23 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,835 | 18 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,237 | 34 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | #1,876 | 18 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,371 | 31 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,598 | 24 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,589 | 26 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,728 | 24 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,541 | 28 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,443 | 32 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,566 | 29 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,350 | 34 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,309 | 36 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,148 | 44 | #3,517 | 7 |
| 1920 | #1,407 | 32 | #3,815 | 6 |
| 1919 | #1,216 | 38 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,690 | 23 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,126 | 40 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,246 | 33 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,285 | 30 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,228 | 25 | #2,915 | 6 |
| 1913 | #1,465 | 16 | — | |
| 1912 | #938 | 29 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,372 | 12 | — | |
| 1910 | #914 | 22 | — | |
| 1909 | #845 | 23 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,004 | 16 | — | |
| 1907 | #990 | 15 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,101 | 12 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,093 | 12 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,050 | 12 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,592 | 6 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,320 | 8 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,067 | 10 | — | |
| 1900 | #705 | 26 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,379 | 7 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,094 | 9 | — | |
| 1896 | #872 | 14 | — | |
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | #1,237 | 7 | — | |
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | #1,278 | 6 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,213 | 6 | — | |
| 1890 | #1,210 | 6 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,279 | 5 | — | |
| 1888 | #1,136 | 6 | — | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | #920 | 5 | — | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1883
The first year at least five girls were named Lossie! It came in at #920, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1883–1887, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Lossie
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1961
- Biggest jump: 476 spots in 1900 (#1,181 → #705)
- Biggest drop: 527 spots in 1913 (#938 → #1,465)
Rise & fade · girls
17 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1883
- Peaked 1900 at #705 (26 births)
- Births halved by 1901, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 7 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 1909–1910
Share of babies · girls
1 in 11,530
- Highest: 1 in 11,530 girls born in 1900 were named Lossie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 403,699 girls born in 1961 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 26.0% of all girls named Lossie (309) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 16 | #920 (1883) | #1,112 |
| 1890s | 63 | #872 (1896) | #1,183 |
| 1900s | 140 | #705 (1900) | #1,077 |
| 1910s | 268 | #914 (1910) | #1,248 |
| 1920s | 309 | #1,148 (1921) | #1,468 |
| 1930s | 208 | #1,237 (1932) | #1,811 |
| 1940s | 106 | #2,117 (1942) | #3,324 |
| 1950s | 74 | #2,937 (1951) | #4,351 |
| 1960s | 5 | #6,567 (1961) | #6,567 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Lossie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: