Lottie
- #527 for girls in 2025, 570 births
- Last seen for boys in 1943 at #3,538
- Given to girls 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1886 · 450 births
- Debut · girls
- 245 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 19 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 48,352since 1880
Lottie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #527 | 570 | — | |
| 2024 | #676 | 424 | — | |
| 2023 | #776 | 363 | — | |
| 2022 | #950 | 285 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,091 | 227 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,552 | 136 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,629 | 130 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,840 | 110 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,236 | 84 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,972 | 101 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,340 | 79 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,582 | 68 | — | |
| 2013 | #3,314 | 48 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,901 | 59 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,916 | 38 | — | |
| 2010 | #4,494 | 32 | — | |
| 2009 | #4,482 | 33 | — | |
| 2008 | #4,761 | 31 | — | |
| 2007 | #6,093 | 22 | — | |
| 2006 | #6,592 | 19 | — | |
| 2005 | #6,245 | 19 | — | |
| 2004 | #5,555 | 22 | — | |
| 2003 | #4,418 | 29 | — | |
| 2002 | #5,254 | 22 | — | |
| 2001 | #6,067 | 18 | — | |
| 2000 | #7,580 | 13 | — | |
| 1999 | #4,870 | 22 | — | |
| 1998 | #5,583 | 18 | — | |
| 1997 | #4,660 | 22 | — | |
| 1996 | #5,065 | 19 | — | |
| 1995 | #4,846 | 20 | — | |
| 1994 | #6,319 | 14 | — | |
| 1993 | #4,524 | 22 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,773 | 28 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,936 | 26 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,714 | 28 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,893 | 25 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,095 | 32 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,743 | 23 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,973 | 31 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,419 | 25 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,781 | 32 | — | |
| 1983 | #3,151 | 26 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,532 | 37 | — | |
| 1981 | #3,253 | 26 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,537 | 37 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,236 | 25 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,196 | 24 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,162 | 43 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,135 | 40 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,357 | 34 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,667 | 55 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,349 | 32 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,698 | 52 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,560 | 62 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,653 | 56 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,609 | 55 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,279 | 74 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,281 | 71 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,320 | 67 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,194 | 81 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,112 | 97 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,119 | 95 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,152 | 90 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,012 | 115 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,007 | 114 | — | |
| 1959 | #901 | 134 | — | |
| 1958 | #870 | 137 | — | |
| 1957 | #897 | 129 | — | |
| 1956 | #779 | 160 | — | |
| 1955 | #788 | 148 | — | |
| 1954 | #652 | 198 | — | |
| 1953 | #697 | 171 | — | |
| 1952 | #616 | 202 | — | |
| 1951 | #626 | 190 | — | |
| 1950 | #574 | 211 | — | |
| 1949 | #508 | 256 | — | |
| 1948 | #503 | 264 | — | |
| 1947 | #509 | 263 | — | |
| 1946 | #534 | 218 | — | |
| 1945 | #444 | 256 | — | |
| 1944 | #428 | 280 | — | |
| 1943 | #439 | 284 | #3,538 | 5 |
| 1942 | #402 | 319 | — | |
| 1941 | #372 | 332 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #361 | 327 | — | |
| 1939 | #335 | 357 | — | |
| 1938 | #368 | 315 | — | |
| 1937 | #327 | 365 | — | |
| 1936 | #321 | 369 | — | |
| 1935 | #316 | 393 | — | |
| 1934 | #290 | 445 | #3,277 | 6 |
| 1933 | #278 | 467 | — | |
| 1932 | #291 | 462 | #3,092 | 7 |
| 1931 | #276 | 508 | — | |
| 1930 | #267 | 556 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #234 | 674 | #2,589 | 10 |
| 1928 | #244 | 658 | — | |
| 1927 | #234 | 769 | #2,912 | 9 |
| 1926 | #231 | 773 | — | |
| 1925 | #220 | 851 | #4,197 | 5 |
| 1924 | #203 | 978 | — | |
| 1923 | #193 | 1,099 | — | |
| 1922 | #192 | 1,090 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #183 | 1,208 | #3,869 | 6 |
| 1920 | #177 | 1,240 | — | |
| 1919 | #162 | 1,368 | #3,391 | 7 |
| 1918 | #162 | 1,378 | — | |
| 1917 | #153 | 1,362 | #2,956 | 8 |
| 1916 | #143 | 1,389 | #2,926 | 8 |
| 1915 | #153 | 1,237 | #3,392 | 6 |
| 1914 | #142 | 1,053 | #2,651 | 7 |
| 1913 | #143 | 837 | #2,273 | 7 |
| 1912 | #142 | 772 | — | |
| 1911 | #135 | 620 | — | |
| 1910 | #127 | 634 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1909 | #121 | 583 | #1,440 | 5 |
| 1908 | #116 | 580 | — | |
| 1907 | #130 | 512 | #1,345 | 5 |
| 1906 | #118 | 529 | — | |
| 1905 | #116 | 547 | — | |
| 1904 | #118 | 497 | — | |
| 1903 | #113 | 509 | — | |
| 1902 | #111 | 537 | — | |
| 1901 | #106 | 498 | — | |
| 1900 | #97 | 690 | — | |
| 1899 | #93 | 584 | — | |
| 1898 | #102 | 586 | — | |
| 1897 | #102 | 523 | — | |
| 1896 | #92 | 574 | — | |
| 1895 | #95 | 553 | — | |
| 1894 | #87 | 597 | — | |
| 1893 | #92 | 532 | — | |
| 1892 | #89 | 547 | #1,066 | 5 |
| 1891 | #88 | 501 | — | |
| 1890 | #88 | 502 | — | |
| 1889 | #81 | 498 | — | |
| 1888 | #81 | 511 | #917 | 6 |
| 1887 | #81 | 414 | — | |
| 1886 | #75 | 450 | — | |
| 1885 | #80 | 393 | — | |
| 1884 | #76 | 397 | — | |
| 1883 | #76 | 372 | — | |
| 1882 | #82 | 319 | — | |
| 1881 | #80 | 289 | — | |
| 1880 | #88 | 245 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Lottie was already there! It came in at #88, and was given to 245 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2000–2001, when fewer than 19 girls a year got the name.
Where Lottie is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wyoming | #58 | 6 | 1 in 135 |
| Utah | #151 | 29 | 1 in 589 |
| Tennessee | #174 | 44 | 1 in 729 |
| Alabama | #190 | 23 | 1 in 796 |
| Iowa | #199 | 16 | 1 in 736 |
| Kentucky | #233 | 19 | 1 in 908 |
| South Dakota | #233 | 5 | 1 in 610 |
| Mississippi | #242 | 11 | 1 in 809 |
| Oklahoma | #247 | 16 | 1 in 924 |
| Idaho | #277 | 8 | 1 in 896 |
| Louisiana | #295 | 15 | 1 in 1,091 |
| Arkansas | #301 | 10 | 1 in 1,059 |
| West Virginia | #308 | 5 | 1 in 1,015 |
| Kansas | #324 | 10 | 1 in 1,181 |
| Minnesota | #344 | 16 | 1 in 1,342 |
| Indiana | #345 | 20 | 1 in 1,395 |
| South Carolina | #347 | 14 | 1 in 1,306 |
| Missouri | #386 | 15 | 1 in 1,620 |
| Oregon | #396 | 9 | 1 in 1,450 |
| Georgia | #418 | 27 | 1 in 1,674 |
| Wisconsin | #447 | 11 | 1 in 1,842 |
| North Carolina | #472 | 23 | 1 in 2,021 |
| Michigan | #484 | 17 | 1 in 2,102 |
| Ohio | #514 | 20 | 1 in 2,364 |
| Colorado | #634 | 8 | 1 in 2,916 |
| Texas | #674 | 45 | 1 in 3,568 |
| Massachusetts | #761 | 6 | 1 in 4,005 |
| Washington | #811 | 7 | 1 in 4,123 |
| Pennsylvania | #813 | 11 | 1 in 4,244 |
| Virginia | #843 | 8 | 1 in 4,218 |
| Florida | #912 | 17 | 1 in 5,104 |
| New York | #980 | 15 | 1 in 5,222 |
| Illinois | #1,014 | 8 | 1 in 5,541 |
| Arizona | #1,040 | 5 | 1 in 5,644 |
| California | #1,085 | 24 | 1 in 6,739 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lottie
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 1,025 spots since 2020 (#1,552 → #527)
- Biggest jump: 174 spots in 2023
- Biggest drop: 136 spots in 1955
Rise & fade · girls
6 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1886 at #75 (450 births)
- Births halved by 1946, 60 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 19 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 19 yrs · run 1880–1896
- Top 1,000: 84 yrs · run 1880–1959
Share of babies · girls
1 in 302
- Highest: 1 in 302 girls born in 1883 were named Lottie (0.33%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,820 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- Its best rank, #75 in 1886, was only 1 in 321 (0.31%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1910s
- 22.0% of all girls named Lottie (10,650) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 3,888 | #75 (1886) | #80 |
| 1890s | 5,499 | #87 (1894) | #93 |
| 1900s | 5,482 | #97 (1900) | #115 |
| 1910s | 10,650 | #127 (1910) | #146 |
| 1920s | 9,340 | #177 (1920) | #211 |
| 1930s | 4,237 | #267 (1930) | #307 |
| 1940s | 2,799 | #361 (1940) | #450 |
| 1950s | 1,680 | #574 (1950) | #740 |
| 1960s | 859 | #1,007 (1960) | #1,209 |
| 1970s | 423 | #1,560 (1971) | #2,201 |
| 1980s | 294 | #2,532 (1982) | #3,138 |
| 1990s | 219 | #3,714 (1990) | #4,729 |
| 2000s | 228 | #4,418 (2003) | #5,705 |
| 2010s | 749 | #1,629 (2019) | #2,722 |
| 2020s | 2,005 | #527 (2025) | #929 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Lottie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: