Lotus

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1896 · 11 births
Debut · girls
11 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
2,766
since 1896

Lotus over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank1900192019401960198020002020peak #999, 1896peak #3,392, 1915girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,818110#4,53922
2024#1,648125#4,89020
2023#1,524140#5,07519
2022#1,763117#6,14714
2021#1,516139#4,01126
2020#2,11586#6,62012
2019#2,14087#6,10414
2018#1,953101#8,8198
2017#1,779117#7,54610
2016#2,14990#9,6647
2015#2,29481—
2014#2,08193#12,1085
2013#2,03295#12,1365
2012#2,59769#12,2745
2011#3,30349#12,2875
2010#3,15952—
2009#2,77964#10,9946
2008#3,22252#12,5535
2007#3,72143—
2006#4,46332—
2005#4,11834#11,4725
2004#5,20824—
2003#6,05519—
2002#5,89719—
2001#6,95615—
2000#8,02712—
1999#8,80510—
1998#8,58410—
1997#8,33410—
1996——
1995#8,7669—
1994#11,7786—
1993#13,4425—
1992——
1991——
1990#11,4096—
1989——
1988#11,7985—
1987——
1986——
1985——
1984#9,1446—
1983#10,2755—
1982#10,5175—
1981#10,4115—
1980#7,4188—
1979——
1978——
1977#8,4446—
1976#4,15415—
1975——
1974——
1973#5,19110—
1972#5,9598—
1971#6,6197—
1970——
1969——
1968——
1967——
1966#5,8096—
1965#6,5395—
1964——
1963#6,5925—
1962——
1961——
1960#5,1687—
1959#6,2455—
1958#6,1035—
1957#5,3776—
1956#4,4678—
1955#3,77810—
1954#3,71810—
1953——
1952#3,7969—
1951#3,48210—
1950#2,78114—
1949——
1948#2,70114—
1947#5,2955—
1946#2,73913—
1945#3,1329—
1944#4,0546—
1943#3,04010—
1942#2,98610—
1941#3,5597—
1940#2,10915—
1939#1,94717—
1938#2,57911—
1937#1,91417—
1936#2,26313—
1935#1,72020—
1934#2,00316—
1933#2,27513—
1932#1,68521—
1931#1,68621—
1930#2,55212—
1929#2,01117—
1928#2,02318#3,6976
1927#2,33915—
1926#1,83022—
1925#1,50430—
1924#1,92621—
1923#1,94420#3,4677
1922#1,68225—
1921#1,72325#4,3225
1920#1,95220—
1919#1,85520—
1918#2,10217—
1917#1,60523—
1916#1,38028—
1915#1,47524#3,3926
1914#1,66516—
1913#1,76612—
1912#1,62012—
1911#1,7928—
1910——
1909#1,9576—
1908——
1907#1,8216—
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902#1,7935—
1901#1,1369—
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897#1,5555—
1896#99911—
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1896

The first year at least five girls were named Lotus! It came in at #999, and was given to 11 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1897–1900, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Lotus is popular in 2025

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedMINew York: #1,526 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 9,791 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,409 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 10,108 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedWVVirginia: #1,037 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,624 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #1,138 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,640 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedALGeorgia: #915 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 4,521 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Lotus, so not publishedHITexas: #2,386 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 20,068 girlsTXFlorida: #2,151 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 17,352 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Georgia#915 · 1 in 4,521
  2. Virginia#1,037 · 1 in 5,624
  3. North Carolina#1,138 · 1 in 6,640
  4. California#1,409 · 1 in 10,108
  5. New York#1,526 · 1 in 9,791

Best ever in a state: #378 in Nevada, 2024.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Georgia#915101 in 4,521
Virginia#1,03761 in 5,624
North Carolina#1,13871 in 6,640
California#1,409161 in 10,108
New York#1,52681 in 9,791
Florida#2,15151 in 17,352
Texas#2,38681 in 20,068
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See every state's top names →

See more about Lotus
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 170 spots since 2024 (#1,648 → #1,818)
  • 297 spots since 2020 (#2,115 → #1,818)
  • Biggest drop: 556 spots in 1897
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
  • Debuted 1896
  • Peaked 1896 at #999 (11 births)
  • Births halved by 1897, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 1 yr
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 1 yr · 1896
Share of babies · girls
1 in 11,461
  • Highest: 1 in 11,461 girls born in 2023 were named Lotus (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 14,612 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
  • Its best rank, #999 in 1896, was only 1 in 21,629 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 30.2% of all girls named Lotus (834) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
  • The majority has never changed
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1890s16#999 (1896)#1,277
1900s26#1,136 (1901)#1,677
1910s160#1,380 (1916)#1,696
1920s213#1,504 (1925)#1,893
1930s161#1,685 (1932)#2,062
1940s89#2,109 (1940)#3,291
1950s77#2,781 (1950)#4,416
1960s23#5,168 (1960)#6,027
1970s46#4,154 (1976)#6,073
1980s34#7,418 (1980)#9,927
1990s56#8,334 (1997)#10,160
2000s314#2,779 (2009)#5,045
2010s834#1,779 (2017)#2,349
2020s717#1,516 (2021)#1,731

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Want to check a specific year?

See where Lotus ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: