Lowell
Last seen for girls in 2021 at #15,251 · #3,240 for boys in 2025, 36 births
Given to boys 99.2% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1931 · 1,090 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 41,330since 1881
Lowell over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Lowell has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,240 | 36 | |
| 2024 | — | #3,693 | 30 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,629 | 31 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,100 | 39 | |
| 2021 | #15,251 | 5 | #2,862 | 43 |
| 2020 | — | #3,025 | 38 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,897 | 42 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,796 | 43 | |
| 2017 | — | #3,123 | 37 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,838 | 42 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,641 | 46 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,985 | 38 | |
| 2013 | — | #2,955 | 38 | |
| 2012 | — | #2,632 | 46 | |
| 2011 | — | #3,605 | 29 | |
| 2010 | — | #3,708 | 28 | |
| 2009 | — | #2,946 | 40 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,946 | 40 | |
| 2007 | — | #2,974 | 39 | |
| 2006 | — | #2,932 | 38 | |
| 2005 | — | #2,846 | 37 | |
| 2004 | — | #3,074 | 32 | |
| 2003 | — | #2,620 | 38 | |
| 2002 | — | #2,817 | 33 | |
| 2001 | — | #2,988 | 30 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,895 | 55 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,733 | 59 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,957 | 49 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,859 | 50 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,638 | 59 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,477 | 65 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,753 | 50 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,379 | 70 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,255 | 81 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,196 | 86 | |
| 1990 | — | #1,058 | 100 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,064 | 96 | |
| 1988 | — | #1,023 | 92 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,047 | 83 | |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #937 | 95 |
| 1985 | — | #897 | 102 | |
| 1984 | — | #884 | 97 | |
| 1983 | — | #930 | 90 | |
| 1982 | — | #798 | 123 | |
| 1981 | #10,411 | 5 | #882 | 102 |
| 1980 | — | #850 | 108 | |
| 1979 | — | #762 | 130 | |
| 1978 | — | #774 | 118 | |
| 1977 | — | #762 | 124 | |
| 1976 | — | #689 | 145 | |
| 1975 | — | #725 | 130 | |
| 1974 | — | #724 | 128 | |
| 1973 | — | #639 | 155 | |
| 1972 | — | #646 | 152 | |
| 1971 | — | #555 | 212 | |
| 1970 | — | #523 | 238 | |
| 1969 | — | #508 | 234 | |
| 1968 | — | #441 | 299 | |
| 1967 | — | #459 | 272 | |
| 1966 | — | #449 | 292 | |
| 1965 | — | #430 | 323 | |
| 1964 | — | #427 | 353 | |
| 1963 | — | #426 | 358 | |
| 1962 | — | #395 | 419 | |
| 1961 | — | #400 | 393 | |
| 1960 | — | #380 | 431 | |
| 1959 | #5,566 | 6 | #368 | 453 |
| 1958 | — | #364 | 449 | |
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 | #359 | 449 |
| 1956 | — | #329 | 507 | |
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | #339 | 470 |
| 1954 | — | #333 | 471 | |
| 1953 | #5,673 | 5 | #318 | 491 |
| 1952 | — | #320 | 488 | |
| 1951 | — | #287 | 566 | |
| 1950 | — | #276 | 572 | |
| 1949 | — | #255 | 636 | |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | #260 | 623 |
| 1947 | #4,764 | 6 | #255 | 670 |
| 1946 | #3,994 | 7 | #238 | 650 |
| 1945 | #3,676 | 7 | #223 | 603 |
| 1944 | — | #205 | 720 | |
| 1943 | — | #200 | 806 | |
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 | #177 | 885 |
| 1941 | #3,954 | 6 | #176 | 865 |
| 1940 | #3,863 | 6 | #172 | 870 |
| 1939 | #3,782 | 6 | #166 | 924 |
| 1938 | — | #164 | 966 | |
| 1937 | #3,434 | 7 | #155 | 982 |
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | #150 | 1,022 |
| 1935 | #3,156 | 8 | #152 | 994 |
| 1934 | #2,923 | 9 | #148 | 1,033 |
| 1933 | #2,868 | 9 | #161 | 880 |
| 1932 | #2,644 | 11 | #150 | 1,047 |
| 1931 | #2,750 | 10 | #147 | 1,090 |
| 1930 | — | #191 | 721 | |
| 1929 | #2,587 | 12 | #193 | 700 |
| 1928 | #2,954 | 10 | #188 | 758 |
| 1927 | #3,053 | 10 | #193 | 757 |
| 1926 | #2,257 | 16 | #195 | 725 |
| 1925 | #2,939 | 11 | #196 | 709 |
| 1924 | #2,409 | 15 | #175 | 819 |
| 1923 | #3,641 | 8 | #194 | 710 |
| 1922 | #2,958 | 11 | #197 | 698 |
| 1921 | #2,509 | 14 | #198 | 690 |
| 1920 | #2,731 | 12 | #198 | 670 |
| 1919 | #2,813 | 11 | #204 | 608 |
| 1918 | #2,376 | 14 | #225 | 555 |
| 1917 | #2,100 | 16 | #205 | 551 |
| 1916 | — | #208 | 529 | |
| 1915 | #2,526 | 11 | #201 | 536 |
| 1914 | #2,876 | 7 | #209 | 390 |
| 1913 | #2,540 | 7 | #206 | 322 |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | #231 | 225 |
| 1911 | — | #251 | 104 | |
| 1910 | — | #291 | 71 | |
| 1909 | #1,763 | 7 | #299 | 58 |
| 1908 | — | #278 | 60 | |
| 1907 | — | #292 | 53 | |
| 1906 | — | #266 | 54 | |
| 1905 | — | #266 | 55 | |
| 1904 | — | #354 | 32 | |
| 1903 | — | #297 | 40 | |
| 1902 | — | #373 | 28 | |
| 1901 | — | #383 | 24 | |
| 1900 | — | #375 | 35 | |
| 1899 | — | #254 | 43 | |
| 1898 | — | #364 | 28 | |
| 1897 | — | #375 | 25 | |
| 1896 | — | #357 | 29 | |
| 1895 | — | #347 | 28 | |
| 1894 | — | #480 | 17 | |
| 1893 | — | #479 | 15 | |
| 1892 | — | #641 | 11 | |
| 1891 | — | #524 | 12 | |
| 1890 | — | #376 | 22 | |
| 1889 | — | #415 | 19 | |
| 1888 | — | #704 | 9 | |
| 1887 | — | #631 | 9 | |
| 1886 | — | #578 | 11 | |
| 1885 | — | #641 | 9 | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | #677 | 8 | |
| 1882 | — | #611 | 10 | |
| 1881 | — | #866 | 5 | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1881
The first year at least five boys were named Lowell! It came in at #866, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1884, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Lowell is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Indiana#81 · 1 in 391
- Iowa#95 · 1 in 451
- Nebraska#99 · 1 in 416
- Washington#109 · 1 in 575
- Minnesota#115 · 1 in 627
Best ever in a state: #52 in Minnesota, 1931.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana | #81 | 52 | 1 in 391 |
| Iowa | #95 | 40 | 1 in 451 |
| Nebraska | #99 | 25 | 1 in 416 |
| Washington | #109 | 13 | 1 in 575 |
| Minnesota | #115 | 30 | 1 in 627 |
| Idaho | #123 | 6 | 1 in 539 |
| Ohio | #125 | 45 | 1 in 902 |
| South Dakota | #131 | 8 | 1 in 638 |
| Kansas | #141 | 16 | 1 in 824 |
| Utah | #143 | 7 | 1 in 565 |
| Colorado | #146 | 8 | 1 in 775 |
| Illinois | #149 | 46 | 1 in 1,080 |
| Missouri | #153 | 23 | 1 in 1,070 |
| Arkansas | #180 | 14 | 1 in 979 |
| Alabama | #183 | 18 | 1 in 1,176 |
| Oklahoma | #188 | 14 | 1 in 1,111 |
| Wisconsin | #198 | 12 | 1 in 1,672 |
| California | #200 | 12 | 1 in 1,496 |
| Michigan | #201 | 17 | 1 in 1,622 |
| West Virginia | #216 | 7 | 1 in 1,597 |
| Kentucky | #225 | 12 | 1 in 1,642 |
| Texas | #250 | 27 | 1 in 1,417 |
| Tennessee | #280 | 8 | 1 in 2,337 |
| Georgia | #322 | 9 | 1 in 2,902 |
| Virginia | #350 | 5 | 1 in 3,690 |
| North Carolina | #371 | 7 | 1 in 3,592 |
| Pennsylvania | #426 | 7 | 1 in 10,482 |
| New York | #462 | 8 | 1 in 10,035 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Lowell
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 453 spots since 2024 (#3,693 → #3,240)
- 215 spots since 2020 (#3,025 → #3,240)
- 599 spots since 2015 (#2,641 → #3,240)
- Biggest jump: 289 spots in 1889 (#704 → #415)
- Biggest drop: 148 spots in 1891 (#376 → #524)
Rise & fade · boys
50 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1931 at #147 (1,090 births)
- Births halved by 1952, 21 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 105 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 105 yrs · run 1885–1986
Share of babies · boys
1 in 954
- Highest: 1 in 954 boys born in 1931 were named Lowell (0.10%)
- Latest: 1 in 47,447 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1930s
- 23.4% of all boys named Lowell (9,659) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 80 | #415 (1889) | #640 |
| 1890s | 230 | #254 (1899) | #420 |
| 1900s | 439 | #266 (1905) | #318 |
| 1910s | 3,891 | #201 (1915) | #223 |
| 1920s | 7,236 | #175 (1924) | #193 |
| 1930s | 9,659 | #147 (1931) | #158 |
| 1940s | 7,328 | #172 (1940) | #216 |
| 1950s | 4,916 | #276 (1950) | #329 |
| 1960s | 3,374 | #380 (1960) | #432 |
| 1970s | 1,532 | #523 (1970) | #680 |
| 1980s | 988 | #798 (1982) | #931 |
| 1990s | 669 | #1,058 (1990) | #1,531 |
| 2000s | 382 | #1,895 (2000) | #2,804 |
| 2010s | 389 | #2,632 (2012) | #3,018 |
| 2020s | 217 | #2,862 (2021) | #3,258 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Lowell in 1916
boys
#208
529 births · 1 in 1,683 boys
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 1,683 of them was named Lowell, which outranked 95.4% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Lowell
Biggest movers since 1915
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.