Luca
- #2,645 for girls in 2025, 65 births
- #14 for boys in 2025, 8,759 births
- Given to boys 97.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2025 · 8,759 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 7 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 77,521since 1915
Luca over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,645 | 65 | #14 | 8,759 |
| 2024 | #2,722 | 63 | #23 | 7,991 |
| 2023 | #2,176 | 87 | #24 | 7,810 |
| 2022 | #2,277 | 82 | #28 | 7,855 |
| 2021 | #1,760 | 116 | #42 | 6,891 |
| 2020 | #2,034 | 91 | #67 | 4,832 |
| 2019 | #2,035 | 94 | #87 | 4,423 |
| 2018 | #2,071 | 93 | #106 | 3,615 |
| 2017 | #2,074 | 94 | #130 | 3,091 |
| 2016 | #2,321 | 81 | #151 | 2,755 |
| 2015 | #2,590 | 69 | #157 | 2,617 |
| 2014 | #2,582 | 68 | #185 | 2,304 |
| 2013 | #2,385 | 76 | #201 | 1,902 |
| 2012 | #2,734 | 64 | #223 | 1,617 |
| 2011 | #2,838 | 61 | #260 | 1,340 |
| 2010 | #2,938 | 58 | #272 | 1,275 |
| 2009 | #2,568 | 72 | #281 | 1,200 |
| 2008 | #2,995 | 58 | #305 | 1,097 |
| 2007 | #3,428 | 48 | #312 | 1,056 |
| 2006 | #4,165 | 35 | #348 | 873 |
| 2005 | #3,509 | 42 | #400 | 707 |
| 2004 | #3,180 | 48 | #393 | 686 |
| 2003 | #3,869 | 35 | #463 | 544 |
| 2002 | #3,978 | 32 | #524 | 430 |
| 2001 | #5,822 | 19 | #585 | 343 |
| 2000 | #9,874 | 9 | #626 | 297 |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #1,063 | 128 |
| 1998 | #9,260 | 9 | #1,114 | 115 |
| 1997 | — | #1,350 | 82 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,265 | 87 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,467 | 66 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,516 | 62 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,444 | 65 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,820 | 45 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,983 | 38 | |
| 1990 | — | #2,214 | 32 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,993 | 36 | |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | #1,790 | 38 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | #1,864 | 34 |
| 1986 | — | #3,440 | 13 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,293 | 23 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,529 | 19 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,140 | 24 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,426 | 20 | |
| 1981 | — | #1,766 | 32 | |
| 1980 | — | #3,256 | 13 | |
| 1979 | — | #2,465 | 19 | |
| 1978 | — | #2,375 | 19 | |
| 1977 | — | #3,386 | 11 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,873 | 26 | |
| 1975 | — | #2,540 | 16 | |
| 1974 | — | #2,946 | 12 | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | #3,963 | 7 | |
| 1971 | — | #4,907 | 5 | |
| 1970 | — | #4,230 | 6 | |
| 1969 | — | #2,682 | 11 | |
| 1968 | — | #2,445 | 12 | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | #2,476 | 11 | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | #3,044 | 8 | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | #3,665 | 6 | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | #3,538 | 5 | |
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | #2,980 | 8 | |
| 1928 | — | #3,697 | 6 | |
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | #3,385 | 7 | |
| 1925 | — | #3,408 | 7 | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | #3,175 | 8 | |
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | #4,286 | 5 | |
| 1919 | — | #4,168 | 5 | |
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | #3,545 | 6 | |
| 1916 | — | #3,177 | 7 | |
| 1915 | — | #3,392 | 6 | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Luca! It came in at #3,392, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1918–1922, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Luca is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Hawaii#3 · 1 in 69
- New Jersey#4 · 1 in 105
- Rhode Island#5 · 1 in 65
- Connecticut#5 · 1 in 86
- New York#6 · 1 in 124
Best ever in a state: #3 in Hawaii, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #3 | 42 | 1 in 69 |
| New Jersey | #4 | 378 | 1 in 105 |
| Connecticut | #5 | 153 | 1 in 86 |
| Rhode Island | #5 | 48 | 1 in 65 |
| New York | #6 | 680 | 1 in 124 |
| Florida | #7 | 710 | 1 in 135 |
| California | #9 | 1,257 | 1 in 140 |
| Arizona | #11 | 245 | 1 in 134 |
| Colorado | #12 | 190 | 1 in 141 |
| Massachusetts | #12 | 240 | 1 in 113 |
| Nevada | #13 | 82 | 1 in 138 |
| Illinois | #17 | 302 | 1 in 164 |
| Pennsylvania | #17 | 344 | 1 in 152 |
| District of Columbia | #18 | 25 | 1 in 101 |
| Kansas | #19 | 83 | 1 in 169 |
| Ohio | #20 | 291 | 1 in 181 |
| Texas | #20 | 909 | 1 in 193 |
| Washington | #21 | 190 | 1 in 173 |
| Oregon | #23 | 95 | 1 in 159 |
| Utah | #23 | 117 | 1 in 168 |
| New Mexico | #25 | 41 | 1 in 159 |
| North Carolina | #26 | 264 | 1 in 195 |
| Michigan | #27 | 206 | 1 in 195 |
| Vermont | #27 | 12 | 1 in 101 |
| Wisconsin | #28 | 123 | 1 in 191 |
| Maine | #29 | 30 | 1 in 128 |
| Iowa | #30 | 73 | 1 in 189 |
| New Hampshire | #31 | 34 | 1 in 132 |
| Delaware | #32 | 21 | 1 in 140 |
| Georgia | #33 | 217 | 1 in 231 |
| Virginia | #33 | 180 | 1 in 207 |
| Minnesota | #36 | 113 | 1 in 217 |
| North Dakota | #36 | 21 | 1 in 160 |
| Nebraska | #42 | 43 | 1 in 205 |
| Maryland | #43 | 107 | 1 in 214 |
| Idaho | #45 | 41 | 1 in 210 |
| Oklahoma | #45 | 76 | 1 in 233 |
| South Carolina | #45 | 88 | 1 in 241 |
| Indiana | #46 | 133 | 1 in 238 |
| Arkansas | #48 | 54 | 1 in 233 |
| Louisiana | #52 | 69 | 1 in 277 |
| Wyoming | #54 | 8 | 1 in 136 |
| Alaska | #56 | 12 | 1 in 189 |
| Missouri | #56 | 100 | 1 in 278 |
| Tennessee | #65 | 124 | 1 in 297 |
| Montana | #76 | 15 | 1 in 251 |
| West Virginia | #85 | 21 | 1 in 293 |
| Kentucky | #89 | 56 | 1 in 367 |
| Alabama | #94 | 55 | 1 in 391 |
| Mississippi | #97 | 29 | 1 in 374 |
| South Dakota | #105 | 12 | 1 in 320 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Luca
- 53 spots since 2020 (#67 → #14)
- Biggest jump: 437 spots in 2000
- Biggest drop: 7 spots in 2005
- Debuted 1915
- Peaked 2025 at #14 (8,759 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 7 yrs · run 2019–2025
- Top 1,000: 26 yrs · run 2000–2025
- Highest: 1 in 195 boys born in 2025 were named Luca (0.51%)
- 56.9% of all boys named Luca (44,138) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 24 | #3,177 (1916) | #3,571 |
| 1920s | 41 | #2,980 (1929) | #3,489 |
| 1930s | 0 | — | — |
| 1940s | 5 | #3,538 (1943) | #3,538 |
| 1950s | 0 | — | — |
| 1960s | 48 | #2,445 (1968) | #2,862 |
| 1970s | 121 | #1,873 (1976) | #3,187 |
| 1980s | 252 | #1,766 (1981) | #2,350 |
| 1990s | 720 | #1,063 (1999) | #1,524 |
| 2000s | 7,233 | #281 (2009) | #424 |
| 2010s | 24,939 | #87 (2019) | #177 |
| 2020s | 44,138 | #14 (2025) | #33 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Luca ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: