Lucinda

#1,747 for girls in 2025, 116 births · Last seen for boys in 1958 at #3,559
Given to girls >99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1881 · 88 births
Debut · girls
63 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
38,401
since 1880

Lucinda over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Lucinda has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201919peak #153, 1881girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,747116—
2024#1,681121—
2023#1,865107—
2022#1,870108—
2021#1,652126—
2020#1,587132—
2019#1,629130—
2018#1,616132—
2017#1,460154—
2016#1,267192—
2015#1,545143—
2014#1,519144—
2013#1,397165—
2012#1,279187—
2011#1,382165—
2010#1,253191—
2009#1,414166—
2008#1,339183—
2007#1,424166—
2006#1,574137—
2005#1,589128—
2004#1,654117—
2003#1,522128—
2002#1,338145—
2001#1,627112—
2000#1,602110—
1999#1,329135—
1998#2,01374—
1997#1,456113—
1996#1,64193—
1995#1,61492—
1994#1,56598—
1993#1,518103—
1992#1,452109—
1991#1,244136—
1990#1,104158—
1989#1,009170—
1988#1,033156—
1987#970163—
1986#832200—
1985#749231—
1984#723228—
1983#720231—
1982#710244—
1981#619293—
1980#634287—
1979#659265—
1978#644252—
1977#659242—
1976#572287—
1975#540319—
1974#503349—
1973#490359—
1972#447420—
1971#407527—
1970#381624—
1969#329756—
1968#374593—
1967#416504—
1966#405522—
1965#369613—
1964#360689—
1963#369679—
1962#354721—
1961#330812—
1960#331808—
1959#328823—
1958#298899#3,5596
1957#2721,025#3,9935
1956#294923—
1955#299846—
1954#264997—
1953#260978—
1952#265908—
1951#278797—
1950#272792—
1949#265843—
1948#279752—
1947#319596—
1946#374410—
1945#371360—
1944#404314—
1943#400334—
1942#429282—
1941#417273—
1940#471203—
1939#514169—
1938#544157—
1937#529156—
1936#586128—
1935#540141—
1934#559132—
1933#588120—
1932#580128—
1931#628111—
1930#574141—
1929#540159—
1928#558157—
1927#603139—
1926#554163—
1925#532179—
1924#570164—
1923#488201—
1922#515184—
1921#547168—
1920#483201—
1919#489188—
1918#499185—
1917#480186—
1916#427215—
1915#455182—
1914#466138—
1913#381159—
1912#379146—
1911#367120—
1910#357123—
1909#357103—
1908#336112—
1907#340105—
1906#328106—
1905#324107—
1904#323101—
1903#32292—
1902#32491—
1901#30595—
1900#298123—
1899#30494—
1898#281118—
1897#29596—
1896#256124—
1895#28298—
1894#271104—
1893#28987—
1892#239122—
1891#24498—
1890#246101—
1889#25684—
1888#23497—
1887#21692—
1886#21090—
1885#21584—
1884#20186—
1883#17492—
1882#16693—
1881#15388—
1880#19363—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Lucinda was already there! It came in at #193, and was given to 63 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 94 girls a year got the name.

Where Lucinda is popular in 1919

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedILWisconsin: #365 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,562 girlsWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: #346 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 5,481 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMOKentucky: #400 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,861 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedWVVirginia: #230 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,829 girlsVAMaryland: #247 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,325 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: #178 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 649 girlsNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedKSArkansas: #390 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,899 girlsARTennessee: #348 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,234 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #319 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 3,002 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #268 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,366 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #472 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,441 girlsOKLouisiana: #372 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,718 girlsLAMississippi: #312 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,188 girlsMSAlabama: #297 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,371 girlsALGeorgia: #372 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,715 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedHITexas: #451 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 3,051 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New Mexico#178 · 1 in 649
  2. Virginia#230 · 1 in 1,829
  3. Maryland#247 · 1 in 2,325
  4. South Carolina#268 · 1 in 2,366
  5. Alabama#297 · 1 in 2,371

Best ever in a state: #101 in New Mexico, 1923.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Mexico#17851 in 649
Virginia#230151 in 1,829
Maryland#24761 in 2,325
South Carolina#268101 in 2,366
Alabama#297131 in 2,371
Mississippi#312101 in 2,188
North Carolina#319121 in 3,002
Pennsylvania#346171 in 5,481
Tennessee#34881 in 3,234
Wisconsin#36551 in 4,562
Georgia#372101 in 3,715
Louisiana#37281 in 2,718
Arkansas#39071 in 2,899
Kentucky#40071 in 3,861
Texas#451171 in 3,051
Oklahoma#47251 in 4,441
Alaska———
Arizona———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New York———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lucinda
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 66 spots since 2024 (#1,681 → #1,747)
  • 160 spots since 2020 (#1,587 → #1,747)
  • 202 spots since 2015 (#1,545 → #1,747)
  • Biggest jump: 57 spots in 1937 (#586 → #529)
  • Biggest drop: 138 spots in 1987 (#832 → #970)
Rise & fade · girls
1 yr to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1881 at #153 (88 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 108 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 108 yrs · run 1880–1987
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,045
  • Highest: 1 in 1,045 girls born in 1881 were named Lucinda (0.10%)
  • Latest: 1 in 13,856 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 23.4% of all girls named Lucinda (8,988) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s869#153 (1881)#202
1890s1,042#239 (1892)#271
1900s1,035#298 (1900)#326
1910s1,642#357 (1910)#430
1920s1,715#483 (1920)#539
1930s1,383#514 (1939)#564
1940s4,367#265 (1949)#373
1950s8,988#260 (1953)#283
1960s6,697#329 (1969)#364
1970s3,644#381 (1970)#530
1980s2,203#619 (1981)#800
1990s1,111#1,104 (1990)#1,494
2000s1,392#1,338 (2002)#1,508
2010s1,603#1,253 (2010)#1,435
2020s710#1,587 (2020)#1,734

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lucinda in 1919

girls
#489
188 births · 1 in 6,011 girls

Top girls' names in 1919

  1. #1Mary65,836
  2. #2Helen33,706
  3. #3Dorothy31,733
  4. #4Margaret26,238
  5. #5Ruth24,562
  6. #6Mildred17,300
  7. #7Virginia15,636
  8. #8Elizabeth15,287
  9. #9Frances15,106
  10. #10Anna14,498
  11. #489Lucinda188
More about 1919

girls

1,130,117 girls got a published name in 1919; 1 in 6,011 of them was named Lucinda, which outranked 91.2% of the 5,559 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lucinda
  1. #485Margarita190
  2. #487Alpha189
  3. #487Oleta189
  4. #489Lucinda188
  5. #489Jaunita188
  6. #489Winona188
  7. #492Una186
  8. #493Minerva185
  9. #494Gail184

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1918
Risers
  1. ↑ 851Gregoria#1,805 → #954
  2. ↑ 443Concha#1,333 → #890
  3. ↑ 390Arlena#1,299 → #909
  4. ↑ 353Marina#1,255 → #902
  5. ↑ 333Roselle#1,333 → #1,000
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,019Liberty#585 → #1,604
  2. ↓ 840Victory#809 → #1,649
  3. ↓ 567Karen#960 → #1,527
  4. ↓ 404Zena#989 → #1,393
  5. ↓ 359Malvina#989 → #1,348

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1919 →