Lucinda

#1,747 for girls in 2025, 116 births · Last seen for boys in 1958 at #3,559
Given to girls >99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1881 · 88 births
Debut · girls
63 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
38,401
since 1880

Lucinda over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Lucinda has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201939peak #153, 1881girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,747116—
2024#1,681121—
2023#1,865107—
2022#1,870108—
2021#1,652126—
2020#1,587132—
2019#1,629130—
2018#1,616132—
2017#1,460154—
2016#1,267192—
2015#1,545143—
2014#1,519144—
2013#1,397165—
2012#1,279187—
2011#1,382165—
2010#1,253191—
2009#1,414166—
2008#1,339183—
2007#1,424166—
2006#1,574137—
2005#1,589128—
2004#1,654117—
2003#1,522128—
2002#1,338145—
2001#1,627112—
2000#1,602110—
1999#1,329135—
1998#2,01374—
1997#1,456113—
1996#1,64193—
1995#1,61492—
1994#1,56598—
1993#1,518103—
1992#1,452109—
1991#1,244136—
1990#1,104158—
1989#1,009170—
1988#1,033156—
1987#970163—
1986#832200—
1985#749231—
1984#723228—
1983#720231—
1982#710244—
1981#619293—
1980#634287—
1979#659265—
1978#644252—
1977#659242—
1976#572287—
1975#540319—
1974#503349—
1973#490359—
1972#447420—
1971#407527—
1970#381624—
1969#329756—
1968#374593—
1967#416504—
1966#405522—
1965#369613—
1964#360689—
1963#369679—
1962#354721—
1961#330812—
1960#331808—
1959#328823—
1958#298899#3,5596
1957#2721,025#3,9935
1956#294923—
1955#299846—
1954#264997—
1953#260978—
1952#265908—
1951#278797—
1950#272792—
1949#265843—
1948#279752—
1947#319596—
1946#374410—
1945#371360—
1944#404314—
1943#400334—
1942#429282—
1941#417273—
1940#471203—
1939#514169—
1938#544157—
1937#529156—
1936#586128—
1935#540141—
1934#559132—
1933#588120—
1932#580128—
1931#628111—
1930#574141—
1929#540159—
1928#558157—
1927#603139—
1926#554163—
1925#532179—
1924#570164—
1923#488201—
1922#515184—
1921#547168—
1920#483201—
1919#489188—
1918#499185—
1917#480186—
1916#427215—
1915#455182—
1914#466138—
1913#381159—
1912#379146—
1911#367120—
1910#357123—
1909#357103—
1908#336112—
1907#340105—
1906#328106—
1905#324107—
1904#323101—
1903#32292—
1902#32491—
1901#30595—
1900#298123—
1899#30494—
1898#281118—
1897#29596—
1896#256124—
1895#28298—
1894#271104—
1893#28987—
1892#239122—
1891#24498—
1890#246101—
1889#25684—
1888#23497—
1887#21692—
1886#21090—
1885#21584—
1884#20186—
1883#17492—
1882#16693—
1881#15388—
1880#19363—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Lucinda was already there! It came in at #193, and was given to 63 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 94 girls a year got the name.

Where Lucinda is popular in 1939

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMNIllinois: #584 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 10,744 girlsILWisconsin: #341 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,700 girlsWIMichigan: #422 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 5,928 girlsMINew York: #458 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 7,099 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedSDIowa: #292 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,179 girlsIAIndiana: #270 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,822 girlsINOhio: #340 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 4,200 girlsOHPennsylvania: #448 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 7,229 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMOKentucky: #404 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,596 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedWVVirginia: #362 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,973 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: #234 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,110 girlsNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #459 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,142 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #405 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,230 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #380 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,824 girlsLAMississippi: #444 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,408 girlsMSAlabama: #394 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,049 girlsALGeorgia: #407 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,445 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedHITexas: #643 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 6,332 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Lucinda, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New Mexico#234 · 1 in 1,110
  2. Indiana#270 · 1 in 2,822
  3. Iowa#292 · 1 in 3,179
  4. Ohio#340 · 1 in 4,200
  5. Wisconsin#341 · 1 in 4,700

Best ever in a state: #101 in New Mexico, 1923.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Mexico#23451 in 1,110
Indiana#27091 in 2,822
Iowa#29261 in 3,179
Ohio#340121 in 4,200
Wisconsin#34151 in 4,700
Virginia#36261 in 3,973
Louisiana#38081 in 2,824
Alabama#39471 in 4,049
Kentucky#40461 in 4,596
South Carolina#40551 in 4,230
Georgia#40771 in 4,445
Michigan#42271 in 5,928
Mississippi#44451 in 4,408
Pennsylvania#448101 in 7,229
New York#458121 in 7,099
North Carolina#45961 in 6,142
Illinois#58451 in 10,744
Texas#64391 in 6,332
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kansas———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Lucinda
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 66 spots since 2024 (#1,681 → #1,747)
  • 160 spots since 2020 (#1,587 → #1,747)
  • 202 spots since 2015 (#1,545 → #1,747)
  • Biggest jump: 57 spots in 1937 (#586 → #529)
  • Biggest drop: 138 spots in 1987 (#832 → #970)
Rise & fade · girls
1 yr to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1881 at #153 (88 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 108 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 108 yrs · run 1880–1987
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,045
  • Highest: 1 in 1,045 girls born in 1881 were named Lucinda (0.10%)
  • Latest: 1 in 13,856 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 23.4% of all girls named Lucinda (8,988) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s869#153 (1881)#202
1890s1,042#239 (1892)#271
1900s1,035#298 (1900)#326
1910s1,642#357 (1910)#430
1920s1,715#483 (1920)#539
1930s1,383#514 (1939)#564
1940s4,367#265 (1949)#373
1950s8,988#260 (1953)#283
1960s6,697#329 (1969)#364
1970s3,644#381 (1970)#530
1980s2,203#619 (1981)#800
1990s1,111#1,104 (1990)#1,494
2000s1,392#1,338 (2002)#1,508
2010s1,603#1,253 (2010)#1,435
2020s710#1,587 (2020)#1,734

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Lucinda in 1939

girls
#514
169 births · 1 in 6,489 girls

Top girls' names in 1939

  1. #1Mary54,900
  2. #2Barbara37,257
  3. #3Patricia29,701
  4. #4Betty23,639
  5. #5Shirley20,447
  6. #6Carol20,166
  7. #7Nancy19,723
  8. #8Judith16,625
  9. #9Dorothy15,169
  10. #10Margaret14,949
  11. #514Lucinda169
More about 1939

girls

1,096,612 girls got a published name in 1939; 1 in 6,489 of them was named Lucinda, which outranked 89.6% of the 4,950 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Lucinda
  1. #511Flossie171
  2. #512Carmella170
  3. #512Mercedes170
  4. #514Lucinda169
  5. #514Dana169
  6. #514Deanne169
  7. #514Georgie169
  8. #518Lily168
  9. #519Reta167
  10. #520Ginger165

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1938
Risers
  1. ↑ 880April#1,805 → #925
  2. ↑ 865Karel#1,703 → #838
  3. ↑ 725Hedy#1,650 → #925
  4. ↑ 722Vivien#1,703 → #981
  5. ↑ 709Karon#1,547 → #838
Fallers
  1. ↓ 712Eulalia#972 → #1,684
  2. ↓ 446Shelvia#955 → #1,401
  3. ↓ 358Naoma#992 → #1,350
  4. ↓ 304Imelda#890 → #1,194
  5. ↓ 279Helaine#870 → #1,149

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1939 →